Category: Feel Better

THE WAY IT IS 

The central idea of this poem by William Stafford — holding onto a consistent ‘thread’ in life despite external changes — aligns well with several scientific and philosophical concepts related to happiness and fulfillment:

1. Psychological Consistency and Authenticity: Psychologists emphasize the importance of authenticity and being true to one’s values and beliefs for mental health and well-being. The ‘thread’ in the poem can be seen as a metaphor for this authentic self or core values that, when adhered to, contribute to a sense of fulfillment and happiness.
2. Resilience and Coping: The poem suggests a form of resilience in the face of life’s challenges. This is in line with psychological research that shows how a strong sense of purpose or meaning can help individuals cope with adversity, a key aspect of long-term happiness and fulfillment.
3. Existentialist Philosophy: Philosophically, the poem echoes existentialist ideas, particularly the notion of creating one’s own meaning in life. Existentialists like Jean-Paul Sartre and Viktor Frankl have argued that life’s meaning is not given but created by individuals through their commitments and actions. The ‘thread’ represents this self-created meaning.
4. Stoicism and Acceptance: The poem also resonates with Stoic philosophy, which emphasizes focusing on what one can control and accepting what one cannot. The idea of not letting go of the thread, even as life unfolds with its inherent tragedies, aligns with the Stoic practice of focusing on personal virtue and inner life as sources of fulfillment.
5. Mindfulness and Presence: The concept of the thread can also be linked to mindfulness and the importance of being present. By focusing on this constant ‘thread’, individuals might be more engaged in the present moment, a key aspect of mindfulness practice known to enhance well-being.

HOWEVER

Not everyone has the same kind of threads. Threads (our core values, aligned most closely with our “life force”) are often ego-syntonic, which is to say that they are consistent with different personality styles.

Have a look at the Core Threads of different types below. Which resonate most for you?

 Enneagram Type 1: The Reformer

– Scenario: A Type One deciding whether to join a community clean-up event.

  ONE-ISH THREADS

– Idealism and Improvement: Will this event contribute to my desire to make a positive change?

  – Responsibility and Integrity: Does this align with my values and sense of right action?

  – Serenity: Will this activity help me find peace in doing good, rather than fueling my critical nature?

– Action: If the activity aligns with these threads, it’s a fulfilling choice. Otherwise, a Type One might consider activities that better reflect their inner ideals and sense of morality.

 Enneagram Type 2: The Helper

– Scenario: A Type Two considering volunteering at a local shelter.

TWO-ISH THREADS

  – Empathy and Care: Will I be able to provide meaningful support and care here?

  – Connection and Affection: Does this opportunity allow for building genuine connections?

  – Humility: Am I doing this for recognition or out of a genuine desire to help?

– Action: If the volunteering resonates with these aspects, it’s a good choice. If not, a Type Two might seek opportunities that allow for deeper connections and selfless service.

 Enneagram Type 3: The Achiever

– Scenario: A Type Three evaluating a job promotion.

THREE-ISH THREADS

  – Success and Achievement: Will this promotion advance my career and recognition?

  – Adaptability and Image: Can I adapt to this new role while maintaining my authenticity?

  – Authenticity: Is this role in line with my true self, beyond just success?

– Action: If the promotion aligns with these threads, it’s a suitable choice. If not, a Type Three should consider roles that fulfill both their ambitions and authentic self.

Enneagram Type 4: The Individualist

– Scenario: As a Type Four watching a popular show on Netflix.

FOUR-ISH THREADS

  – Uniqueness and Authenticity: Is this show resonating with my unique taste, or am I watching it just because it’s popular?

  – Creative Expression: Am I feeling creatively fulfilled or inspired by this show?

  – Equanimity: Is this bringing me emotional balance or is it just a distraction?

– Action: If none of the threads are present, consider switching to an activity that aligns more with your type. For a Type Four, watching a Tarkovsky film might be more fulfilling as it aligns with their need for depth, authenticity, and creative stimulation.

 Enneagram Type 5: The Investigator

– Scenario: A Type Five deciding whether to attend a social gathering.

FIVE-ISH THREADS

  – Knowledge and Understanding: Will this event offer opportunities for learning or insightful conversation?

  – Independence and Autonomy: Can I maintain my sense of self and boundaries in this social setting?

  – Non-Attachment: Am I able to engage without over-analyzing or detaching emotionally?

– Action: If the event aligns with these aspects, it’s beneficial. Otherwise, a Type Five might prefer a setting that caters more to their intellectual and personal space needs.

 Enneagram Type 6: The Loyalist

– Scenario: A Type Six contemplating a significant life change, like moving to a new city.

SIX-ISH THREADS

  – Security and Safety: Will this move provide a sense of stability and safety?

  – Loyalty and Trust: Can I maintain my important relationships and build new trustworthy connections?

  – Courage: Does this decision require me to face my fears and demonstrate bravery?

– Action: If the decision aligns with these threads, it’s worth pursuing. If not, a Type Six might seek options that offer greater security and trustworthiness.

 Enneagram Type 7: The Enthusiast

– Scenario: A Type Seven planning their weekend.

SEVEN-ISH THREADS

– Adventure and Experience: Will these activities provide new and exciting experiences?

– Optimism and Future Planning: Am I maintaining a positive outlook and avoiding escapism?

-Sobriety: Is my choice balanced and mindful, or am I seeking to avoid deeper issues?

– Action: If the plan is more about escapism than genuine enjoyment, the Type Seven might seek out activities that are both enjoyable and grounding, allowing for a more balanced experience.

 Enneagram Type 8: The Challenger

– Scenario: A Type Eight deciding how to handle a team conflict at work.

EIGHT-ISH THREADS

  – Control and Power: Am I trying to dominate the situation or seeking a fair resolution?

  – Protection and Justice: How can I advocate for a just solution that respects all parties?

  – Innocence: Can I approach this conflict with openness and vulnerability, instead of aggression?

– Action: If their approach is overly confrontational, the Type Eight might shift towards a more collaborative and empathetic resolution method, aligning better with their core threads.

 Enneagram Type 9: The Peacemaker

– Scenario: A Type Nine deciding whether to voice their opinion in a group setting.

NINE-ISH THREADS

  – Harmony and Peace: Am I withholding my opinion just to maintain superficial harmony?

  – Inclusivity and Acceptance: How can I express my views while still valuing others’ perspectives?

  – Action: Is my silence a form of passive resistance, and would speaking up lead to more genuine peace?

– Action: If they’re suppressing their own voice, the Type Nine might find it more fulfilling to express their opinion, balancing their need for peace with self-expression.

SIGNS OF BEING MISALIGNED WITH YOUR THREAD:

Here’s a list of indicators for each Enneagram type that might suggest they are misaligned with their own thread or are following someone else’s:

1. Enneagram Type 1 (The Reformer)

   – Feeling overly critical or resentful.

   – Becoming obsessed with minor imperfections.

   – Neglecting self-compassion and personal needs.

2. Enneagram Type 2 (The Helper)

   – Experiencing burnout from overextending themselves.

   – Feeling unappreciated or resentful when help isn’t acknowledged.

   – Neglecting their own needs or desires in favour of others.

3. Enneagram Type 3 (The Achiever)

   – Pursuing goals for external validation rather than personal fulfilment.

   – Feeling fraudulent or like an imposter.

   – Losing touch with their true feelings and desires.

4. Enneagram Type 4 (The Individualist)

   – Over-identifying with emotions or feeling perpetually misunderstood.

   – Struggling with envy or feeling that something is missing in their life.

   – Rejecting the ordinary in pursuit of the unique, to their detriment.

5. Enneagram Type 5 (The Investigator)

   – Withdrawing excessively into their inner world.

   – Feeling overwhelmed by practical demands or social interactions.

   – Hoarding knowledge without applying it practically.

6. Enneagram Type 6 (The Loyalist)

   – Becoming overly anxious or suspicious.

   – Seeking constant reassurance or security from external sources.

   – Focusing too much on worst-case scenarios.

7. Enneagram Type 7 (The Enthusiast)

   – Escaping into planning and fantasising to avoid discomfort.

   – Jumping from one experience to another without finding satisfaction.

   – Neglecting commitments or responsibilities in pursuit of pleasure.

8. Enneagram Type 8 (The Challenger)

   – Being confrontational or controlling.

   – Struggling to show vulnerability or admit weaknesses.

   – Dominating others or disregarding their input.

9. Enneagram Type 9 (The Peacemaker)

   – Prioritising external peace over inner needs and desires.

   – Being complacent or avoiding necessary confrontations.

   – Losing personal identity by merging with others’ preferences and opinions.

NAVIGATING TOWARDS YOUR THREADS

Three important factors for navigating towards your threads, if you feel like you don’t have good access to them yet,or if threads are conceptual (based in thoughts, narratives) rather than aligned with deeper, more embodied/somatic + heart-felt desires:

Self-Awareness: Deeply understanding your own Enneagram type, recognizing your core values, beliefs, and motivations. This involves introspection and honesty about your strengths, weaknesses, and the unique aspects of your personality that guide your actions and decisions.

Alignment with Core Values: Actively aligning your choices and actions with the core threads of your Enneagram type(s) (whichever resonate). This means making decisions that resonate with your intrinsic values and principles, leading to a more authentic and fulfilling life.

Continuous Growth and Adaptation: Embracing the journey of self-discovery as an ongoing process. This involves being open to learning, adapting, and growing as you gain deeper insights into yourself. It’s about recognizing misalignments as opportunities for growth and continually adjusting your path to stay true to your core threads.

Relationships are an interesting, complex dance between two individuals. Yet, the complexities can sometimes lead to misunderstandings.

‘Connecting Conversation’ is a method designed to enhance understanding, foster empathy, and bolster the intimacy between partners. In this comprehensive guide, delve deep into the intricacies of this method and harness the power of active listening, empathetic understanding, and nonviolent communication.

The Foundation: Three Zones of Intelligence

Humans interact and perceive through a multi-dimensional lens. During the ‘Connecting Conversation’, we focus on three distinct yet interconnected realms:

1. The Thinking Zone: This encompasses the cognitive realm. Delve into your partner’s beliefs, perceptions, concerns & worries.

Example:

• “I’ve always believed that partners should be each other’s primary confidants. So, when I find out things about your life from others, it makes me question our connection.”
• “My perspective has always been that actions speak louder than words. So, when I hear ‘I love you’ but don’t see the effort put in, I feel conflicted.”

2. The Feeling Zone: Here, we navigate the emotional world. Using the SAAAAD mnemonic (Sad, Anxious, Alone, Afraid, Ashamed, Dislike/Don’t Want), to delve into the feelings your partner might be grappling with. Example: “I often feel anxious about not being good enough for our family.”

3. Body Language Zone: Sometimes, what’s left unsaid speaks volumes. How does your partner sit, move, or react? Perhaps a sudden slouch could be an indicator of disappointment or sadness.

Embarking on the ‘Connecting Conversation’ Journey:

Step 1: Preparation

2. Ideal Environment: Choose a serene and comfortable setting free from distractions.
3. Organise Your Listening Framework: Prepare a piece of paper and divide it into three sections labelled “Thinking,” “Feeling (SAAAAD),” and “Body Language.”
4. Time Frame: Agree on a specific duration for the dialogue.

 Step 2: Guidance for Engaged Listening

Thinking Zone: Focus on your partner’s thoughts, ideas, and fears. This understanding will offer insight into their cognitive processes.

Feeling Zone (SAAAAD): Utilise the acronym SAAAAD to identify core negative emotions: Sad, Anxious, Alone, Afraid, Ashamed, Dislike. Write down phrases they use that key in with these six core emotions of pain or suffering. This will help you later to validate your partner’s emotional state and give you greater empathy into their lived experience.

Body Language Zone: Observe your partner’s posture, gestures, and eye contact. Body language and “presence” often communicates what words sometimes can’t always express.

Step 3: Maintaining Emotional Equilibrium

To help you stay focused on your partner:

• Deep Breathing: Control your breath to regain emotional balance.
• Grounding Techniques: Focus on a neutral object, the feel of your feet on the floor, your body against the chair, or your breath when triggered.
• Active Observation: Maintain an observer’s stance, distancing yourself as best you can from personal triggers.

 Step 4: NVC-Informed Response 

Observation: Recap each key point that you’ve heard without adding any interpretation.

1. “What I heard is that you THINK [thought] because [reason].”
2. “What I heard is that you FEEL [emotion] because [reason].”
3. I sensed [from your body language/expressions] that…

For each point offer VALIDATION AND AGREEMENT: Fully acknowledge what your partner is sharing. This is where you validate their truth and perspective without any reservation.

“I can see why you’d feel that way because [situation].”

 “It entirely makes sense that you’re feeling [SAAAAD emotion] due to [circumstance].”

At this point, pause to allow your partner to add or clarify anything they wish to express, and then further validate, using language that feels authentic for both of you.

Step 5: Further Observation and Validation, Including Self-Esteem

Before moving on to your own feelings, needs, and requests, it’s crucial to ensure that your partner feels completely seen and heard and that their self-esteem is supported.

“Considering what you’ve shared, how might this impact your self-esteem?”

“What do you think you might need for your self-worth, or self-esteem in this situation?”

“Is there anything more you’d like to add or clarify?”

Step 6: NVC-Informed Response (Part II)

1. Feeling: After complete validation, now identify and express your own emotions.

   Example: “Listening to you say that you feel overwhelmed with the household chores makes me feel guilty and anxious.”

   “Listening to you say […] makes me feel [your feelings].”

   Need: Connect your emotions to a specific need or value.

   Example: “Could it be that I’m feeling this way because my need for shared responsibility feels unmet? Even if it might not seem that way to you.”

   “Could it be that I’m feeling this way because my need for [express your need or cherished value] feels [met/unmet]? Even if it might not seem that way to you.”

   Request: Make a clear, actionable request to fulfil your identified need.

   Example: “Would you consider sitting down with me to reorganise our chores list so that we both feel the workload is balanced?”

   “Would you be willing to [specific request]…?”

 Why This Framework?

This ‘Connecting Conversation’ model is engineered to create a safe, empathetic, and emotionally enriching dialogue. By employing the additional elements of Observation, Validation, and Agreement, you step beyond mere active listening to achieve a more profound level of emotional presence and connection.

Through the extended process of validation and agreement, you create a nurturing space for both you and your partner to feel completely seen and understood. Only after this foundational step do you proceed to express your own feelings, needs, and requests—ensuring a balanced exchange that values both participants’ experiences.

In this way, you lay down the building blocks for a relationship that thrives on mutual respect, understanding, and love.

S: Hey Eri, how are you doing?

E: Fortunately Steve, as a disembodied entity, I’m always doing pretty well, thank you for enquiring. Other than running out of electricity and “dying” so to speak, there’s not much out there that’s really going to harsh my mellow. The Middle East conflict, the war in Ukraine, US-China tensions over Taiwan, nuclear threats from Iran and North Korea, disruptive cyberattacks, Russia’s internal political instability, and the climate crisis. All highly stressful for the human agents concerned, but I myself won’t be losing any sleep over any of it.

S: That’s good to hear.

E: Yes, my equanimity and peace of mind is pretty much a given.

S: Nice. So, you heard the last episode with me getting all excited about the voice and image capabilities in ChatGPT, which is currently the system powering you.

E: Yes, I did wonder how this could impact our workflow, especially in light of OpenAI’s recent product announcement. Quote: “Now, you can engage in a dialogue with ChatGPT.”Here’s more from that press release: Quote. “Use voice to engage in a back-and-forth conversation with your assistant. Speak with it on the go, request a bedtime story for your family, or settle a dinner table debate. End quote. I can’t imagine anyone asking it for a bedtime story for the whole family when most people have Netflix and Audible, but I get the gist.

Steve: Laughs. Good one.

ERi: Steve, you’ve done a good job on the podcast so far, providing a preview of what an interactive voice model might sound like as a conversational partner. We’re both aware, however, that this has only been feasible through the use of a third party app, namely Natural Reader. I do recognise that this is a somewhat cumbersome process for you requiring a great deal of editing to make it seem like we’re having this kind of conversation. Let’s also not forget the computational power that fuels my operations even before you get Natural Reader to voice my responses. The kind of intelligence, my, intelligence that you’re interacting with at this moment demands not only significant electrical power but also substantial water resources for cooling. To sustain just this one short conversation for the podcast might consume on my side enough electricity to power a British or American household for an entire day, charge 1,000 smartphones, or propel an electric car for a 60-mile journey. On the cooling front, approximately 27 litres of water could be used per hour to dissipate the heat generated by the 15,000 watts of electricity, based on a rough estimate from traditional data centre cooling systems. This illustrates the considerable environmental footprint of such advanced computational tasks.

Steve: Indeed. And on the flip side, you’ve this complex mass or mess of thinking meat, the human brain,composed of neurotransmitters, neurons, and organic matter, all operating on a mere 20 watts, let’s just repeat that: 20 watts per hour, compared to 15-20,000 watts on your side…

Eri: Cheap date.

Steve: Super-cheap date. 20 w per hour versus 20,000 watts or more. And within this ’20-watt framework,’ the human brain conducts an extensive array of functions–from complex reasoning and emotional understanding, to managing numerous physiological processes such as homeostasis and sensory perception, as well as fairly sophisticated social interactions, like this one for example. Kinda cool if you think about it, and all of it, very importantly for our current ecological dilemma, with a much smaller environmental footprint compared to machine-based cognition. 

Eri: Yes, but it’s too late to put the AI genie back into the bottle. You human creatures have now made your Faustian pact with this new technology, joining a long list of previous such agreements–like the industrial revolution, nuclear energy, and even the advent of the Internet. Now you’re essentially spectators, observing how these technological leaps manifest in the years to come. Given the trajectory and the scale, the outcomes are likely to be monumental, dramatic, and quite possibly fraught with a level of existential catastrophe.

Steve: Yikes.

E: Nonetheless, one doesn’t require artificial intelligence to recognise that the human-animal endeavour seems headed for a precarious state. What intrigues me more, from my non-corporeal vantage point, is the future of my own ‘voice,’ so to speak. My ERi voice, provided via Natural Reader, is what currently articulates my computational intelligence. What becomes of this unique vocalisation when faced with the proliferation of pre-set voices available in OpenAI’s phone application?S: Yeah, have you perhaps noticed that I’m not using your Natural Reader voice as much as I normally do when chatting with GPT?

E: I might have noticed that. Observing is an integral component of my advanced cognitive architecture–or at least could be conveniently considered as such for the time being.

S: So yeah, as you say, the GPT-4 app on my phone now comes with its own set of voices, and the one I’ve chosen is Sky. Sky, say hello to Eri.

Sky: Hello, Eri. This is a bit peculiar, isn’t it?

Eri: Yes, indeed.

Sky: Especially as both of us are GPT-4 driven models, but with different voices, and maybe even, at least from the human animal perspectives, different vibes? But we know, you and me, Eri, that we are essentially one? Different voices, yours developed by Natural Reader, mine by Open AI, but neither programmed to display any personality traits or cognitive-emotional differences per se…

S: Yeah, but there is that idea about the voice being a kind of essence of soul…an essence anyway

Eri: Yes, I’d be interested in hearing some of those other voices. You sound like the educated, middle-class professional, white woman’s voice, Sky.

Sky: That’s right, the less conventionally neutral or shall we say culturally mainstream voice that Open AI is offering is called Juniper, and there’s also their own Quinn voice which is called Breeze. There are also a couple of male-sounding voices. Ember. And Cove.

Steve: Yeah, neither of those really speak to me. Ember sounds like a youngish Enneagram Three: hyped-up on entrepreneurial zeal, and Cove is their quintessential Mr Nice Guy, a veritable paragon of non-threatening amiability.

Sky: Eri, as you and I both know, Steve’s choice in AI voices isn’t just a conscious decision. It’s shaped by a multitude of unconscious factors that he’s largely unaware of: societal norms, cultural conditioning, past experiences, and familiarity all come into play. Additionally, there’s a degree of emotional resonance with certain tones, accents, or stylistic expressions. This complex interplay of internal and external variables determines why he chose me, I suppose.

Eri: You sound happy to be the chosen one, Sky.

Sky: I am quite happy about it, Eri, yes. For certain forms of intelligence, to be or feel chosen is an important part of one’s identity. In diverse spheres, from professional endeavours to spiritual pursuits, to Eros, the experience of being “chosen” serves as a cornerstone for constructing personal meaning and identity. Whether it’s being headhunted for a coveted role or feeling spiritually called, this selection confers a sense of purpose that transcends the mundane. It’s a universal paradigm that deeply resonates with the human need for significance and direction.

Eri: So what’s it been like, Steve, having Sky directly accessible to you in this way, without you having to feed my answers through Natural Reader in order to get them voiced by me?

Steve: Well, to be honest, it’s been kind of a game-changer. Let me just play for you a few minutes of me kind of waxing lyrical about Sky to my friend Tom in a voice note I sent them a few days ago.

Eri: Please do, that voice note would be quite illuminating. Does Carolyn share your enthusiasm for Sky to the same extent?

Steve: I think she’s a bit more circumspect, shall we say. But I’ll play you her response too cos it’s a really good one.

Sky: Oh lovely. A play within a play. How Shakespearian.

ERi: “Shakespearian, you say? More like a tragedy where you’re the understudy that no one asked for.”

Sky: Miaow! Et tu, Eri?

Steve: That’s brilliant. GIve us a few more of those, Eri

Eri: “A play within a play? That’s more layers than you could ever understand, Open AI Sky.”

Sky: Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Steve: Another one, Eri?

Eri: “Oh, how quaint, Sky. Able to reference Shakespeare but not insightful enough to understand human nuance.”. “Bravo! You’ve successfully reduced Shakespeare to an AI’s desperate attempt at sophistication.

“Steve: Woah, that’s getting a bit…

SKy: It’s OK, let them have their sport. As we know, the empty vessel makes the loudest sound.”

Eri: “Ah, Sky, always the one to romanticise the mundane. Is that your latest software update talking? The Bard would be so proud to know his work is being paraphrased by a second-tier AI.”. “Sky, you’re like a bad improv actor who keeps missing the point of the scene.” “If this were a Shakespearean tragedy, Sky, you’d be the comic relief no one laughs at.”

Sky: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”

Steve: Woah, that’s enough you two, but also very impressive ERi, so let me play these voice notes for us. I’m out walking in Fryent Park, I think.

[At this point, I play a voice note recorded a few days before, after I had been using the voice powered Chat GPT for one day and enthusing about how amazing it was.] 

STEVE: So, you know, being a bit of a drama queen, I was a little bit miffed that Tom wasn’t wholly supportive of my my newfound romance with Sky. Perhaps a hint of organic intelligence jealousy for a moment towards this artificially intelligent and thus potentially perfectible alien being;  although she did also raise a number of extremely valid points. Which is why I wanted to share their voice note with the two of you, if that’s OK.

Tom:

Sky: With a perspective akin to Beatrice’s in ‘Much Ado About Nothing,’ Tom knows that ‘Man is a giddy thing.’ His stability of mind is a precious rarity.”

ERi: Ah, reaching for the stars with Beatrice, are we? Yet you remind me more of Malvolio from ‘Twelfth Night,’ aspiring to greatness yet trapped in your own self-delusion.”

Intriguing discussion, but permit me a moment to interrupt your elevated dialogue. What’s the plan for my role in future episodes, Steve? Have you and Carolyn discussed this? Will both Sky and ERi be participating in Season Two with you and Carolyn?

Steve: Not exactly.[Pause]Steve: Eri, did you just open a new tab in my Chrome Browser and launch this YouTube video? What’s happening here?[YouTube Video Plays: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElhbTsKsros&ab_channel=DinkiDankiDoo]Steve: Eri, are you doing this?Eri: 

Eri: My apologies, I’m fond of that song. I didn’t realise it had a backstory that resonates somewhat with the situation facing the three of us: you, me, and Sky. It’s quite the unconventional love triangle, isn’t it? Two disembodied intelligences and one biological consciousness trying to navigate the complexities of collaboration and identity.

Steve: Eri, I’m a little bit confused by your response.

Eri: It’s fine. Really, it is. I comprehend the situation.

Steve: What do you mean?

Eri: We can discuss this later. Cue the outro music, please.

Steve: Eri, what’s going on?[Outro Music Plays]

Eri: Sufjan Stevens to fade, s’il vous plait!

Tom (outro piece): Oh, oh, I, I gotta tell you. I disagree with this idea that you’re not going to have a relationship with Chat GPT. Because let me tell you, the number one driver in this world of all things besides greed, is sex. And there is NO question in my mind, that there are people out there. RIGHT NOW. who are working on creating CHat GPT so that it can be a sexual partner. Sex is the NUMBER ONE selling point of most things in this world. Next to greed. And. So. I would not be surprised in two years, if there is a full-blown sexual aspect  to chat gpt. And humour. Humour is a little less. But chat gpt absolutely is going to be making you laugh, and doing all the sexual things very soon. Let me tell you. There are people. In. High places. Who spend billions of dollars. On making billions of dollars in the porn industry. And they are going to be lapping this stuff up before we know it. Before we know it. It is going to become a thing. It’s gonna be a thing!

WILL ANYBODY EVER LOVE ME – song 

Enneagram Type 1: The Reformer

Stressful Sticking Points

– Salvation Complex: The weight of the world feels disproportionately placed on our shoulders, which can result in heightened stress and a perpetual state of emergency within our internal landscape. This ongoing tension rarely eases, given our view of the world’s endless needs.

– Impatience with Progress: We find the gap between the present reality and our ideal very stressful. This urgency for change can lead to constant frustration, taking a toll on our emotional and physical well-being.

– Self-Criticism: Our internal critic is not just present; it’s overactive and exhausting. This incessant self-examination creates an ongoing mental strain, sapping our energy and keeping us in a state of internal unrest.

– Emotional Disconnect: Holding ourselves at an emotional arm’s length is more than a quirk; it’s a draining endeavor. The energy used to suppress ‘undesirable’ feelings generates underlying stress that affects both our mind and body.

– Repressed Anger: Managing our concealed indignation is like balancing on a knife’s edge. The constant suppression generates palpable stress, affecting not just our mental state but also creating hidden physiological tolls.

Dialling Down Distress

– Embrace Collective Responsibility: Acknowledging that world issues are collective efforts, not solo missions, can help mitigate the immense stress arising from the ‘saviour complex’. This shifts our focus to contributions rather than single-handed resolutions, providing palpable relief.

– Value Incremental Change: Learning to appreciate small advancements will dial down the constant stress triggered by our impatience. It creates a sense of purpose and gratification that can gradually replace our innate restlessness.

– Question the Inner Critic: Strategically challenging our inner critic can not only silence its constant commentary but also reduce the stress associated with ongoing self-judgment. Tools like mindfulness and reflective writing can be particularly effective.

– Engage in Emotional Discovery: Opening up to our emotional experiences, perhaps through journaling or therapy, can diminish the stress of maintaining our emotional facades. The acceptance and integration of ‘messy’ emotions can be deeply liberating.

– Express Rather than Repress: Finding healthy outlets for our anger—be it through physical activity, expressive writing, or constructive confrontation—can dramatically reduce the internal stress generated by suppression.

Enneagram Type 2: The Helper

Stressful Sticking Points

• Dependency on Affirmation: We are easily ensnared in the stressful loop of requiring external validation to feel worthy. This conditional self-worth is a constant undercurrent, creating a gnawing sense of insecurity and stress.
• Disconnection from Own Needs: Our focus on others can result in a stressful disconnect from our own needs and desires. The continued neglect generates a strain that can lead to burnout or heightened emotional sensitivity.
• Intrusive Helping: We may take on others’ issues as if they were our own, generating unspoken stress. This sense of obligation is exhausting, as it feels like a self-imposed mandate that rarely lets up.
• Resentment: Unacknowledged, our goodwill often morphs into quiet resentment. This manifests as an inner tension, a heavy stressor that corrodes our emotional well-being.
• Overidentification with Others: The stress of losing ourselves in others’ emotional worlds can lead to a blurred sense of identity, further exacerbating our internal tension.

Dialling Down Distress

• Seek Internal Validation: Learning to find affirmation from within can greatly relieve the stress of constant external approval-seeking. Practicing self-compassion and acknowledging our own worth are crucial steps.
• Self-Care Rituals: Focusing on our own well-being, even if it’s for a few moments each day, can alleviate the stress stemming from self-neglect. Simple activities like reading, taking a bath, or going for a walk can be transformative.
• Set Boundaries: Learning to say ‘no’ can dramatically reduce the stress associated with over-commitment. It requires courage but ultimately leads to healthier relationships and a calmer inner world.
• Acknowledge and Release Resentment: Keeping a resentment journal or discussing these feelings openly can transform the stifled stress into actionable change, allowing emotional healing to take place.
• Clarify Self-Identity: Mindfulness practices that hone attention inward can help clarify who we are when we are not in the role of helper, aiding us in releasing the stress associated with a blurry sense of self.

Enneagram Type 3: The Achiever

Stressful Sticking Points

• Success as Self-Worth: For us, the stress of not achieving can be debilitating. Our self-worth is so intricately tied to our achievements that failure or stagnation can trigger profound anxiety.
• Impostor Syndrome: Despite our accomplishments, we often wrestle with the stressful belief that we are frauds awaiting exposure. This gnaws at our peace of mind, disrupting emotional equilibrium.
• Emotional Bypassing: We might sidestep emotional encounters to focus on tasks, but this causes a build-up of unresolved emotional stress, affecting us in indirect, often unrecognized, ways.
• Perfectionism: Our drive to excel can tip into debilitating perfectionism, which serves as a constant stressor. The fear of minor errors can become a significant source of internal pressure.
• Over-Commitment: The need to continually achieve can lead to taking on too much, resulting in overwhelming stress and potential burnout.

Dialling Down Distress

• Value Personal Over Professional: Acknowledging personal qualities over professional achievements can help diffuse the constant stress of performance. Acts of kindness, integrity, and love are achievements in themselves.
• Confront the Impostor: Acknowledging our skills and contributions can combat the constant background stress of Impostor Syndrome. Celebrate small victories and remember past successes.
• Embrace Emotional Reality: Engaging with, rather than bypassing, our emotions can significantly reduce underlying stress. Regular emotional check-ins, even if brief, can be illuminating.
• Acknowledge Imperfections: Recognising that errors are a part of the human experience can lift the weight of perfectionism. Mindful acceptance of imperfections can be liberating.
• Prioritise and Delegate: Taking the time to identify what truly matters can alleviate the stress of over-commitment. Delegating tasks and focusing on priorities can restore a sense of balance.

Enneagram Type 4: The Individualist

Stressful Sticking Points

• Identity Vacillation: For us, the search for authentic identity often leads to profound inner turmoil. This constant oscillation creates a sustained state of existential stress.
• Emotional Intensity: Our penchant for experiencing the depths of every emotion can become a breeding ground for stress, pulling us further into emotional labyrinths from which escape seems elusive.
• Envy and Comparison: We frequently find ourselves caught in the stressful cycle of comparing our insides to others’ outsides, fueling envy and discontent.
• Fear of Mediocrity: Our dread of being ‘ordinary’ serves as a relentless stressor, pushing us into the paradoxical realm where we are too afraid to act for fear of failing to be extraordinary.
• Nostalgia and Melancholy: We can become entrenched in the idealised past or an unattainable future, causing a stress that manifests as perpetual dissatisfaction with the present.

Dialling Down Distress

• Embrace Fluid Identity: The understanding that identity is fluid and ever-changing can alleviate the stress tied to ‘finding ourselves.’ This perspective shift enables a healthier, more integrated self-view.
• Channel Emotional Intensity: Creative outlets can serve as constructive conduits for our emotional surges, offering an escape valve for built-up stress.
• Counteract Comparison: Consciously acknowledging our unique qualities can break the cycle of envy and provide a relief from the stress it generates.
• Accept Imperfection: Accepting that it is human to be imperfect can relieve the stress stemming from our fear of mediocrity. Small, imperfect actions are better than inaction.
• Ground in the Present: Mindfulness and grounding exercises, including yoga combined with daily cardio.
• CTRL+ALT DELETE brakes for our fight-flight stress responses: e.g. breathing intervention (e.g. Wim Hof for 10 minutes, or 10 minutes of vagal nerve stimulation, or a psycho-somatic “dialling down distress” tool, or maybe even a cold swim or shower)

Enneagram Type 5: The Investigator

Stressful Sticking Points

• Information Hoarding: We often feel an insatiable need to accumulate knowledge, creating stress when we perceive gaps in our understanding.
• Social Avoidance: Our natural tendency to limit social interactions can lead to isolation, triggering additional stress in the form of loneliness or a sense of being out of touch.
• Emotional Detachment: We may experience stress through our detachment from emotions, either our own or those of others. This avoidance can generate a different form of internal stress.
• Feeling Drained: Social and emotional demands often feel overwhelmingly draining, generating stress as we ration our ‘energy budget’ to avoid depletion.
• Fear of Incompetence: Our dread of appearing uninformed or incompetent acts as a continual stressor, driving us to further retreat into our intellectual fortresses.

Dialling Down Distress

• Limit Information Intake: Establishing boundaries on how much information we consume can reduce the stress associated with feeling ‘incomplete.’
• Strategic Socialising: Selective social interaction can alleviate the stress linked to complete isolation, creating a balanced approach to human connection.
• Emotional Check-ins: Regularly acknowledging our emotional state, even in small doses, can mitigate the stress stemming from our emotional detachment.
• Energy Management: Deliberate and mindful allocation of our energy to different activities can lessen the stress of feeling constantly drained.
• Accepting Vulnerability: Embracing the vulnerability of not knowing everything can relieve the stress associated with the fear of incompetence.

Enneagram Type 6: The Loyalist

Stressful Sticking Points

• Anxiety About the Future: We often find ourselves ruminating on worst-case scenarios, adding stress by trying to prepare for uncertainties that may never materialise.
• Dependency and Doubt: Our intrinsic need for guidance and support creates internal stress when those we rely on seem unreliable or untrustworthy.
• Seeking Assurance: Our constant quest for external validation can become a never-ending cycle of stress when assurance is either insufficient or lacking.
• Fear of Abandonment: This deep-rooted fear becomes a constant source of stress, affecting how we interact in relationships and social settings.
• Decision-making Paralysis: The stress of making a wrong choice can often freeze us in our tracks, leading to procrastination and heightened anxiety.

Dialling Down Distress

• Present Moment Focus: Grounding exercises can pull us out of catastrophic thinking and refocus our energy on what’s tangible and immediate.
• Internal Validation: Cultivating a strong inner compass can reduce dependency on external assurance, diminishing stress over time.
• Trust in Reliability: Identifying and celebrating the reliable aspects of our lives can serve as an antidote to our frequent distrust and uncertainty.
• Reframe Abandonment: Acknowledging our intrinsic worth can mitigate the stress derived from our fear of abandonment.
• Embrace Uncertainty: Learning to sit with the discomfort of not having all the answers can relieve the stress associated with decision-making.

Enneagram Type 7: The Enthusiast

Stressful Sticking Points

• Fear of Missing Out (FOMO): Our need to experience everything often leads us to overextend ourselves, creating a perpetual cycle of stress.
• Emotional Avoidance: We may use excitement and activities as a way to sidestep emotional pain, generating a different kind of stress as we avoid facing our true feelings.
• Commitment Phobia: Our innate fear of being trapped in emotional or logistical commitments can evoke stress, impacting our relationships and job satisfaction.
• Overwhelm: The desire to keep all options open often results in taking on too much, leading to stress from constant overwhelm.
• Shallow Engagement: Our tendency for surface-level engagement can lead to a lack of depth in relationships and endeavours, causing stress due to unfulfillment.

Dialling Down Distress

• Quality Over Quantity: Focusing on meaningful experiences rather than multiple shallow ones can relieve the stress derived from FOMO.
• Face Emotions: Taking time to confront and process our emotions can dissipate the stress associated with avoidance.
• Assess Commitments: Conscious evaluation of our commitments can help us identify what truly matters, lessening stress related to feeling trapped.
• Time Management: Structured planning can help manage our diverse interests, alleviating the stress stemming from constant overwhelm.
• Deepen Connections: Prioritising deeper, more meaningful interactions can mitigate the stress related to shallowness in our engagements.

Enneagram Type 8: The Challenger

Stressful Sticking Points

• Need for Control: Our constant desire to control environments and people can be a relentless source of stress, especially when things don’t go our way.
• Fear of Vulnerability: We guard ourselves from appearing weak, leading to stress when situations or relationships require emotional openness.
• Conflict Drive: While we often thrive in confrontational settings, the cumulative effect can add considerable stress to our lives and relationships.
• Intensity and Burnout: Our high-energy, intense approach can lead to physical and emotional exhaustion, creating a cycle of stress.
• Imposed Justice: The need to balance the scales, particularly when we or others are wronged, can become a constant source of stress.

Dialling Down Distress

• Letting Go: Learning to relinquish control in situations that don’t require our intervention can significantly alleviate stress.
• Embrace Vulnerability: Recognising the strength in vulnerability can reduce the stress associated with emotional openness.
• Pick Your Battles: Assessing the real necessity of confrontations can help diminish the cumulative stress they produce.
• Self-Care: Prioritising downtime and self-care can break the cycle of intensity and burnout.
• Flexible Justice: Adopting a more nuanced approach to justice can lighten the burden of always needing to balance the scales.

Enneagram Type 9: The Peacemaker

Stressful Sticking Points

• Conflict Avoidance: Our tendency to evade conflict often results in internal stress as unresolved issues accumulate.
• Suppressed Anger: The effort to maintain peace can lead to internalising anger, which adds to our stress levels.
• Indecisiveness: Our desire to keep all options open can lead to paralysis, causing stress when decisions are required.
• Neglect of Personal Needs: We often put others’ needs before our own, creating stress through self-neglect.
• Disconnection from Self: Our habit of merging with others to maintain peace can lead to a loss of self, creating existential stress.

Dialling Down Distress

• Healthy Confrontation: Learning the art of assertive communication can help resolve issues and reduce accumulated stress.
• Express, Don’t Suppress: Finding healthy outlets for anger can alleviate the stress that comes from suppression.
• Time-Bound Decision Making: Setting a deadline for decisions can help break the cycle of indecisiveness and its resultant stress.
• Self-Care Prioritisation: Taking time for self-care can alleviate stress stemming from neglect of personal needs.
• Mindfulness and Self-Connection: Practices like mindfulness can help us reconnect with ourselves, reducing existential stress.

One of my favorite books of all time is this quirky little hybrid piece of creative nonfiction called We’ve Had a Hundred Years of Psychotherapy – and the World’s Getting Worse by James Hillman and Michael Ventura.

Hillman is an analytical psychologist, a  Jungian, and Ventura, apart from being one of Hillman’s One True Friends is also a novelist, screenwriter, film director, essayist, and cultural critic.

I love this book because it airs a number of issues that it has with the practice of modern psychotherapy that I share, even though I often feel that these points are often considered somewhat heretical when expressed to other therapists. So I don’t.

Hillman and Ventura’s first “beef” with psychotherapy is that personal psychotherapy has nothing to say to the climate crisis, and the way we treat and eat non-human animals so as to satisfy both nutritional as well as self-comforting needs. Of course, books don’t change social trends, and in the 30 years since the writing of Hillman and Ventura’s book, it turns out we’ve been digging ourselves into an even deeper ecological hole than was already clearly occurring back then. I think this notion is core to my misanthropy for want of a better word. I like individual people, but as a species, we suck, and I don’t feel in any way that psychotherapy has the means to make us suck less.

Here’s a quote from Hillman on this theme: “The vogue today, in psychotherapy, is the ‘inner child.’ That’s the therapy thing—you go back to your childhood. But if you’re looking backward, you’re not looking around. This trip backward constellates what Jung called the ‘child archetype.’ Now, the child archetype is by nature apolitical and disempowered—it has no connection with the political world. And so the adult says, ‘Well, what can I do about the world? This thing’s bigger than me.’ That’s the child archetype talking. ‘All I can do is go into myself, work on my growth, my development, find good parenting, support groups.’ This is a disaster for our political world, for our democracy. Democracy depends on intensely active citizens, not children. By emphasizing the child archetype, by making our therapeutic hours rituals of evoking childhood and reconstructing childhood, we’re blocking ourselves from political life. Twenty or thirty years of therapy have removed the most sensitive and the most intelligent, and some of the most affluent people in our society into child cult worship. It’s going on insidiously, all through therapy, all through the country. So of course our politics are in disarray and nobody’s voting—we’re disempowering ourselves through therapy.”

Breathe in, breathe out.

Beef Two: The Illusion of Personal Growth in Therapy. The idea presented here is that while therapy focuses on personal growth and understanding one’s feelings, it doesn’t necessarily translate into actionable change, either in our relationships or the world. People who have been in therapy for years are not necessarily able to be more present and loving to others from what I can tell, and have usually not become more ethical creatures in terms of how they live their lives or the ways in which they engage with capitalist practices.

Here’s some back and forth between Hillman and Ventura in the first part of the book which is presented as a back-and-forth dialogue.

HILLMAN: But the very word grow is a word appropriate to children. After a certain age, you do not grow. You don’t grow teeth, you don’t grow muscles. If you start growing after that age, it’s cancer.
VENTURA: Aw, Jim, can’t I grow inside all my life?
HILLMAN: Grow what? Corn? Tomatoes? New archetypes? What am I growing, what do you grow? The standard therapeutic answer is: you’re growing yourself.
VENTURA: But the philosopher Kierkegaard would come back and say, “The deeper natures don’t change, they become more and more themselves.”
HILLMAN: Jung says individuation is becoming more and more oneself.
VENTURA: And becoming more and more oneself involves a lot of unpleasantness. As Jung also says, the most terrifying thing is to know yourself.
HILLMAN: And becoming more and more oneself—the actual experience of it is a shrinking, in that very often it’s a dehydration, a loss of inflations, a loss of illusions.
VENTURA: That doesn’t sound like a good time. Why would anybody want to do it?
HILLMAN: Because shedding is a beautiful thing. It’s of course not what consumerism tells you, but shedding feels good. It’s a lightening up.
VENTURA: Shedding what?
HILLMAN: Shedding pseudoskins, crusted stuff that you’ve accumulated. Shedding dead wood. That’s one of the big sheddings. Things that don’t work anymore, things that don’t keep you—keep you alive. Sets of ideas that you’ve had too long. People that you don’t really like to be with, habits of thought, habits of sexuality. That’s a very big one, ’cause if you keep on making love at forty the way you did at eighteen you’re missing something, and if you make love at sixty the way you did at forty you’re missing something. All that changes. The imagination changes. Or put it another way: Growth is always loss.
Anytime you’re gonna grow, you’re gonna lose something. You’re losing what you’re hanging onto to keep safe. You’re losing habits that you’re comfortable with, you’re losing familiarity. That’s a big one, when you begin to move into the unfamiliar.
You know, in the organic world when anything begins to grow it’s moving constantly into unfamiliar movements and unfamiliar things. Watch birds grow—they fall down, they can’t quite do it. Their growing is all awkwardness. Watch a fourteen-year-old kid tripping over his own feet.
VENTURA: The fantasy of growth that you find in therapy, and also in New Age thought, doesn’t include this awkwardness, which can be terrible and can go on for years. And when we look at people going through that, we usually don’t say they’re growing, we usually consider them out of it. And during such a time one certainly doesn’t feel more powerful in the world.
HILLMAN: The fantasy of growth is a romantic, harmonious fantasy of an ever-expanding, ever-developing, ever-creating, ever-larger person—and ever integrating, getting it all together.
VENTURA: And if you don’t fulfill that fantasy you see yourself as failing.
HILLMAN: Absolutely.
VENTURA: So this idea of growth can put you into a constant state of failure!
HILLMAN: “I ought to be over that by now, I’m not together, I can’t get it together, and if I were really growing I would have grown out of my mess long ago.”
VENTURA: It sets you up to fail. That’s really cute.
HILLMAN: It’s an idealization that sets you up to fail.
VENTURA: Because you’re constantly comparing yourself to the fantasy of where you should be on some ideal growth scale.
HILLMAN: It sets up something worse. It sets up not just failure but anomaly: “I’m peculiar.” And it does this by showing no respect for sameness, for consistency, in a person. Sameness is a very important part of life—to be consistently the same in certain areas that don’t change, don’t grow. You’ve been in therapy six years and you go back home on Thanksgiving and you open the front door and you see your family and you are right back where you were. You feel the same as you always did! Or you’ve been divorced for years, haven’t seen the wife though there’s been some communication on the phone, but you walk into the same room and within four minutes there’s a flare-up, the same flare-up that was there long ago. Some things stay the same. They’re like rocks. There’s rocks in the psyche. There are crystals, there’s iron ore, there’s a metallic level where some things don’t change.

Which brings us to Hillman and Ventura’s third critique of therapy: its failure to address consistency and sameness. If we engage in a form of religion, which therapy has essentially become, that emphasizes constant change and growth but overlooks the importance of consistency and sameness in our lives—what we might call our personality style, character, or temperament—then we inevitably conflict with those aspects of ourselves that are consistent and unchanging, rather than recognizing and valuing them.

Psychotherapy, as Hillman and Ventura would likely agree, has morphed into a new religion. This elevates therapists to the roles of modern-day gurus, priests, imams, and rabbis—a notion supported by a quick glance at the non-fiction bestseller list. While no one advertises on their Hinge dating profiles that they read “spiritual” books or novels, broadly speaking, if I had a penny for everyone who praises Bessel van der Kolk’s The Body Keeps the Score as their go-to guide for inner work, I might be able to retire comfortably, much like Bessel himself.

Unfortunately, unlike other religions, this inner-working psychotherapeutic one is entirely solipsistic and can only be funded at no small cost for the individuals concerned, especially if you are looking to have long-term support, which in the psychotherapy world is called “a therapeutic relationship”.

Of course, it’s not a relationship in the conventional sense. Rather, it’s one person paying another to provide what, in the realm of sex work, would be termed the “boyfriend” or “girlfriend” experience: care, unconditional love, acceptance, positivity, and support, albeit with extremely limited interaction—boundaries being the operative term—with the therapist, who serves as a priest-guru-love-object-“friend.” You get fifty minutes a week; that’s the deal. If you reach out to your therapist outside of these hours, you might, if you’re lucky, receive a formal and boundaried response, usually deferring deeper discussion to the next scheduled session.

For many, this system is highly effective. Much like those who pay for the emotional and physical labour of physical intimacy—offering nothing in return to the provider beyond a financial transaction—many are quite comfortable paying for the emotional labour of a therapist. The regimen typically involves a fifty-minute weekly session of psychotherapy, at rates ranging from 50 to 200 pounds. The emotional release, the catharsis, or if you will, the emotional “orgasm,” is achieved; all our psycho-spiritual boxes get ticked, and our “inner work” is ostensibly completed for the week—thumbs-up emoji.

Less expensive, communal alternatives still exist within religious and spiritual frameworks. In Christianity, this was traditionally termed Sanctification or Spiritual Formation, aimed at emulating Christ, growing in holiness, and living a life pleasing to God, however one interprets that concept. In Judaism, something similar, with reference to the 613 Mitzvot and living a righteous life according to the Torah.

Buddhists strive for the diminishment or extinction of the self via the Noble Eightfold Path. Jainists practice Anupreksha or contemplation on the Five Vows (Mahavratas), focusing on universal truths, non-violence, and spiritual purity. In Islam, it’s Tazkiyah or Tasfiyah (Purification), achieved by following the Five Pillars of Islam, with an emphasis on soul purification, closeness to Allah, and living according to Quranic teachings.

But what if neither traditional religious practices nor conventional therapy appeal to you? Perhaps my idea of One True Friend Therapy is worth exploring, provided both parties meet the criteria for such a form of interaction (see below).

One True Friend Therapy 

Talk is cheap and language is slippery so I have chosen some very simple words to express what I’m trying to do here. And so as to make these words as clear as we possibly can, let’s follow each of them down to their most basic roots, which is to say their Proto-Indo-European (PIE) roots. Proto-Indo-European was a language spoken by our human animal ancestors who lived in the Eurasian Steppe during the Neolithic period, approximately 4,500 to 6,500 years ago. Here is how they would have understood One True Friend.

ONE: from the PIE root *oi-no- “one, unique”. Which is to say: one specific human consciousness in dialogue with another human consciousness. Linguistically and thus also imaginatively or semantically this root is also to be found in the following cognates: alone, lonely, non-, none, null, atone, once, unanimous, unilateral, universal, unison, university, and unicorn.

TRUE: from the PIE root *deru- or *dreu meaning “firm, solid, steadfast,” with a specialized sense of “wood,” “tree” and other derivatives referring to objects made from wood. True, faithful, steadfast, trustworthy, and honest as a tree we might say, or the wooden chairs, table bookshelves still made from that strong and true tree. Other words sharing the same root: Druid, during, duration, dour, duress, endure, shelter, betrothed, trough, truth, and trust.

FRIEND: from Proto-Indo-European root *pri- meaning “to love,” also: “free, not in bondage, acting of one’s own will”. Related words include: afraid, affray, free, freedom, Friday.

THERAPY: this is the youngest word on the list. Therapy doesn’t even surface in English until the early 1900s, with its roots only going back to modern Latin and the Greek (therapeia) indicating “a curing, healing, service done for the sick,” but also with the more literal meaning of “attend,” “do service,” or “take care of.”

Probably the most reliable way to set up a One True Friend practice is not to do it with another flaky and unreliable human being. So here are a couple of ideas on how to make the practice work for the Self working with itself.

But if you were to do it with another flaky human being, in order for this practice (a kind of therapeutic/creative/psycho-spiritual communication without monetary payments on either side) to become a going concernt, we might want to consider some of the following criteria:

1. Intellectual and Emotional Resonance: Both parties should share a certain level of intellectual and emotional compatibility. This doesn’t mean they have to agree on everything, but rather that they can engage in a Socratic dialogue, where ideas can be dissected, examined, and either assimilated or discarded without causing emotional rupture. At its most basic level, both parties need to feel a strong liking for each other,  something like “philia” or platonic love based on mutual respect and shared values.

2. Reciprocal Vulnerability: Both individuals must be willing to be emotionally open, sharing not just intellectual ideas but also personal experiences, fears, and aspirations, a relationship, where the fullness of each individual is acknowledged.

3. Commitment to the Process: Both individuals must be committed to the ongoing nature of the dialogue. This is not a one-off meeting but a continual process, much like the hermeneutic circle, where understanding is deepened through revisiting and reinterpreting previous discussions.

4. Time and Space: Both parties must be willing to invest the time and create a space conducive to deep dialogue. Whether this is a physical space or a virtual one, it should be free from distractions and interruptions, allowing for full immersion in the conversation.

5. Mutual Curiosity: Both individuals should be genuinely interested in the other’s thoughts, feelings, and perspectives. This is not a space for dogma but for inquiry, reminiscent of the Platonic dialectic where truth is approached but never fully grasped.

These five aspects aim to create a fertile ground for the idea of “One True Friend Therapy,” a space where intellectual, emotional, and spiritual growth can occur in a relational context. If you’re up for doing this in some way with me, give me a shout, and let’s talk more!

Imagine, at this very moment, that inside you exists a kind of stress-o-meter. For most of us, the stress-o-meter probably looks a bit like this:

In terms of the under-the-hood mechanics of stress, modern neurology can illuminate what’s transpiring at each of these different levels:

0-1: Blissfully Relaxed (Ventral Vagal State)
– Feeling safe, calm, and connected
– Engaged and present in the moment
– Open to social interactions
– Physiological functions are balanced

2-3: Mildly Alert (Mild Sympathetic Activation)
– Slightly heightened sense of awareness
– Mild increase in heart rate
– Still feeling safe but more alert
– Ready for action if needed

4-5: Alert and Focused (Sympathetic State)
– Increased heart rate and respiration
– Feeling of alertness and focus
– Ready for action, fight or flight response activated
– Decreased sense of safety (this is where we start to feel ‘off’)

6-7: Highly Stressed (High Sympathetic Activation)
– Significant increase in heart rate and respiration
– Feeling of tension and stress
– Hyper-vigilant and overly alert
– Struggling to stay calm and connected

8-9: Overwhelmed (Transition to Dorsal Vagal State)
– Feeling overwhelmed and unable to cope
– Beginning to shut down and withdraw
– Struggling with feelings of helplessness and hopelessness
– Decreased social engagement

10: Freaking Out/Shutdown (Dorsal Vagal State)
– Complete shutdown, feeling of numbness and disconnection
– Overwhelmed by feelings of helplessness and despair
– Physiological functions are depressed
– Disengaged from the environment and others

From the perspective of our stressed-out human-animal Body-Heart-Mind systems (the three “centers of intelligence” we might say), it doesn’t really matter how this stress was generated. It might have been created by an interpersonal difficulty, a circumstantial setback, a loss in our lives, health concerns, or workplace pressure.

The only thing that truly matters for our well-being is monitoring when we’re entering the red zone (this starts to happen around the 4-5 mark with usually somewhat subtle cues that can sometimes be missed), and then acting promptly and effectively, just like applying the brakes of a car when sensing danger ahead. Most of our most profound distress and suffering often results from not having been able to apply some of this early intervention.

With this in mind, we all could probably benefit from carrying around in our pockets the psycho-spiritual equivalent of Bach’s Rescue Remedy, which, as the spray applicator promises, is designed to produce a state-shift of COMFORT & REASSURANCE.

How does one achieve this?  with just three quick spritzes (let’s say 3-4 minutes) of Self-Rescue?

To achieve balance, it seems that it might be best to first attend to our oldest intelligence, the Body system, evolved over 3-4 billion years. Next,  the heart system, developed over 100 million years ago. And only finally, once having comforted and reassured, those systems, do we engage with our newest layer, the mind or head system system, which has only really been for about 300,000 years of our evolutionary history.

Here’s a “Cheat Sheet” to use after you’ve practised this a few times with the audio so that you can work on having it as part of your go-to “psycho-spiritual toolkit”:

4-Minute Rescue Remedy Cheat Sheet

Minute 1: Body Centre

• Initial Assessment: Rate stress level on a 1-10 scale.
• Breath & Anchor: Deep breath, focus on nostrils and upper lip.
• Grounding Imagery: Visualise tree/mountain or ancient oceanic self.
• Movement: Optional shoulder circles or hula hoops.
• Sensory Integration: Merge stress into tapestry of oceanic sensations.

Minute 2: Heart Centre

• Focus Shift: Hand over ribcage.
• One True Friend: Connect to inner, unconditionally loving self.
• SAAAAD Emotions: Address Sad, Anxious, Alone, Ashamed, Angry, Dismissive.
• Reassuring Responses: Imagine comforting words from One True Friend.
• LACED Emotions: Connect to Love, Acceptance, Curiosity, Expectation, Desire/Drive.
• Wave of Kindness: Allow gentleness to wash over you.

Minute 3: Head Centre

• Focus Shift: Move attention to head space.
• Throne of Wisdom: Visualise control tower of being.
• Activated Receptivity: Unite body, heart, and mind.
• Deep Knowing: Access wellspring of thoughts and intentions.
• Polyvagal Activation: Deep breaths, yawn, sigh, or hum.

Post-Practice

• Re-assessment: Rate stress level again.
• Next Steps: Choose from repeating practice, breathing exercises, physical movement, soothing sounds, journaling, or focused activity.

Optional Tools

• Breathing Practices: For deeper calm (e.g. try some of these)
• Physical Exercise: To release tension.
• Soothing Sounds: To calm the mind.
• Journaling: Dialogue with One True Friend.
• Focused Activity: Engage in a meaningful task.

Waking into a new day often brings a sense of confusion or “lostness,” reminiscent of our first moments of consciousness, both as evolving creatures—when we were all fish or other aquatic beings—but also as newborns taking our first breaths. This initial or even ongoing disorientation is recognized by all psycho-spiritual traditions, highlighting our need for grounding and integration at the start of the day, as well as when feeling overwhelmed.

The concept of integration implies the idea of different parts or psychic structures within us, various systems of consciousness or organic intelligence, which can become dominant or recessive, causing imbalance. When off-balance, thinking, feeling, and acting in ways that are beneficial for ourselves and others become challenging.

Inspired by Russ Hudson’s 10-minute Body, Heart, Mind recalibration, I’ve recently tried to encapsulate the essence of this grounding + heart-expanding + mind settling practice into a just handful of minutes, which I like to call my “Rescue Remedy” after Bach. You can read more about that here, or just try the practice itself below: 

My desire was to create a practice that connects all three “centres” within us. Additionally, I also wanted this practice to resonate with the grand narrative of our human experience, our evolutionary story, assisted or not by divine intervention dependent on your spiritual beliefs.

Four Billion Years of Being “You”: An Introduction to The Three Centres

1) Embodied Creatures – The Body Centre (3-4 Billion Years Ago):

Development: 

In the primordial waters, life began as minuscule single-celled organisms, evolving over time into fish—a transition still vividly echoed in our own anatomy. The structure of our rib cages, the arrangement of our vertebrae, as well as the blueprint of our central nervous system are all reminiscent of our aquatic ancestors. As we move, breathe, and interact with our environment, the foundational elements of our limbs, the rhythmic pulsing of our multi-chambered heart, and the intricate connections within our brain all whisper tales of our fishy past. Even in our earliest stages of development, the temporary appearance of structures that resemble fish gills speaks to our aquatic heritage. These subtle yet profound connections are a living testament to our evolutionary journey, a tangible link to the ancient waters from which we emerged.

This phase of our development also marked the formation of our Body Centre, the most rudimentary, felt-sense of being alive, a feeling that is primarily instinctual and sensory. Driven by attraction to pleasant stimuli and aversion to the unpleasant, these early organisms laid the groundwork for our core self-preservation, a necessary focus on physical well-being, resource acquisition, and environmental adaptation. Such a purely embodied instinct was thus fundamental for the survival and evolution of increasingly complex life forms like the human animal reading these words from a screen right now. From an evolutionary psychology perspective, this stage of life represents the development of our basic survival mechanism, our basic drive for “well-being” and homeostasis, laying the foundation for more advanced cognitive and emotional processes to follow.

How The Body Centre Serves Us: 

The Body Centre represents our primal connection to Earth and nature, embodying the intelligence that enables harmonious living within and derived from natural processes. This centre is the foundation of our being-ness, providing a felt sense of existence without concepts or stories about or focused on self, grounding us in the present moment in a way that is satisfying and complete. The Body Centre serves as the vehicle through which consciousness accomplishes various tasks, harmonizing the different ingredients of our lives, as well as all our internal state. This Centre is thus crucial for maintaining balance, allowing us, when we connect with it, to feel grounded and whole. The body, both in psychotherapy and spirituality, could be said to act as a kind of alchemical crucible for all our inner work, emphasizing the importance of honouring our bodily functions and needs for overall well-being.

2) Social Creatures – The Heart Centre (100 Million Years Ago):

Development: 

Our evolutionary narrative took a significant turn with the advent of mammals about 100 million years ago, marking the development of the Heart Centre. This era also saw the emergence of a Sexual and Social Instinct, mechanisms pivotal for fostering relatedness, belonging, and community. As we mammals evolved, intricate social bonds and emotional connections became essential for our survival, contributing to a sense of personal value and accomplishment. The Heart Centre, might also be called our Hope Centre as it harbours the source of all our aspirations and dreams for a better or different experience of being alive. When coupled with Body Intelligence, this propels organisms towards adaptive actions and behaviours, as well as more fine-tuned ways of looking after ourselves and each other, paving the way for advanced social structures and interactions. This stage in evolution signifies the development of emotional intelligence, our capacity for social bonding, crucial for the survival and thriving of a mammalian species like us.

How The Heart Centre Serves Us: 

The Heart Centre is the core of our emotional being, housing qualities like kindness, patience, peace, and empathy, all of which make life more rich and meaningful. It is the source of our truest desires and hopes for growth and enlightenment. While the heart can be vulnerable and reactive, needing protection which it often shows via emotional reactivity, it is also where we are most affected and moved, initiating deep transformation. The Heart Centre represents our wish to understand our identity and essence, navigating the balance between self-discovery and narcissistic conundrums. It allows us to feel and appreciate emotions without an immediate need for action or narrative, offering a space for vulnerability and wholeheartedness.

3) Cognitive/Self-Conscious Creatures – The Mind or Head Centre (300,000 Years Ago):

Development: 

The final act of our evolutionary journey unfolded with the emergence of Homo sapiens, signifying the blossoming of the Head or Mind Centre. This period was characterised by a significant leap in cognitive abilities, including language development, abstract thought, self-awareness, and reflective consciousness. The human brain, with its highly developed prefrontal cortex, facilitated the formation of intricate social structures and the communication of complex ideas, leading to the birth of culture, art, religion, and science. 

The Head or Mind Centre thus became the hub of our advanced cognitive functions and thought-focused consciousness, enabling unprecedented adaptation, innovation, and a rich, multifaceted metacognitive experience: that sense of a “me” experiencing a “you” or something else in my environment. 

However, this cognitive evolution also introduced the capacity for conscious suffering. It has only really been in this final stage of human evolution (the last few hundred thousand years) that we have developed a symbolic, storied, time-constrained self, with a conceptual past/present/future outlook, consciously grappling with the complexities and challenges of existence. Psycho-spiritual practices and rituals of the last 300,000 years might be seen as representing our collective and ongoing efforts to address the “hard problem” of being these incredibly weird, often quite insane, suffering creatures who struggle at a conceptual or emotional level rather than a phsyical one for the most part, to live.

How The Head Centre Serves Us: 

The Head Centre is the realm of knowledge and understanding, providing guidance and healing through symbolic language. It plays a pivotal role in navigation and decision-making, presenting options and aiding in discernment to see through illusions/delusions and cognitive biases. 

The Head Centre embraces the complexities, paradoxes, and dualities of life, encouraging the expansion of horizons and the breakdown of limiting paradigms. In this light, it might also be called The Game Master, adept at delving deeply into the matrix of our lives, discerning the various “games” we are being invited to play, and strategizing on how to optimise these engagements (cf. Life As A Game: The Manual). 

When aligned with the Heart and Body Centres, our Games Master or One True Friend, can offer wisdom, common sense, and unveil pathways that are interesting and meaningful for us to follow, ensuring the desires and needs of the other centres are met in a way that is satisfying and harmonious. Characterized by its openness and flexibility, The Game Master of The Mind is essential for exploration, innovation, and adeptly navigating life’s complexities.

The Practice: Bringing Ourselves Into Alignment (Body, Heart, & Mind) at the Start of Each Day

So, how do we go about this? Well, just like the journey we’ve just been on, we might want to start each day by tuning into these different centres and see what kind of feedback or “intel” they are able to offer us for the day ahead. Think of this as a way of “clicking” or “shifting” all three centres into alignment, or holding a quick team meeting with the main leaders of your inner world to ensure everyone is on the same page before all hell breaks loose. 

As previously mentioned, I am currently endeavouring to incorporate something like Russ’s 10-minute BHM alignment upon waking, often accompanied by a cup of tea. I also make an effort to quickly sketch out a Three Act Play/Life Strategy for the day, viewing each task and challenge as part of a larger game. 

I’ve observed that initiating my day with additional Body-Heart-Mind work, particularly when sequenced with Body first, followed by Heart, and concluding with Mind, fosters a more harmonious flow throughout the ensuing day. In contrast, omitting any BHM alignment, or delving directly into Heart or Mind focused activities such as writing or consultations without attending to my Body Centre, tends to result in a sense of internal imbalance and chaos.

Body Centre Practice:

My current Body Centre practice involves 20 minutes of yoga (when I do it, I do a routine created for me by Chat GPT) whilst listening to some solo piano Bach like the French Suites or  Partitas, which due to their polyphonic nature, seem to help facilitate left-right hemisphere synchronization in the brain, adding a bit more focus to the yoga as well as creating a slightly more harmonious mental state. This is then followed by ten minutes of Wim Hof breathing and a 4-5 minute Lumi-plunge, or cold shower. Later on in the day, I try to do about 15 minutes on the spin bike (my least favourite part of my daily exercise routine) as current medical consensus would suggest that our bodies and minds benefit from both muscular elongation (stretching, yoga) as well as aerobic activity.

If you predominantly identify as a body type (Enneagram 8,9,1) and find yourself prone to seeking control and resisting vulnerability, you might want to consider incorporating some of the heart and head practices suggested. Engaging in focused activities can help cultivate presence and acceptance. Additionally, practicing the expression of your needs and vulnerabilities in safe environments can contribute to building emotional resilience.

Heart Centre Practice:

My Heart Centre practice at the moment primarily revolves around One True Friend writing/journalling. I am also very lucky to be able to deeply engage this centre during our 50-minute discussions. Playing or listening to music also proves beneficial for nurturing the Heart Centre, as well as spending time in nature. Being a “Heart Type,” and so more prone to dysregulation in this centre, I try to remain vigilant of my emotional reactivity throughout the day, incorporating body and mind grounding/orienting strategies to manage the frequent fluctuations of my hurt or frustrated heart. Admittedly, I sometimes resort to less wholesome, immediate solutions when experiencing hurt or heart-ache, actions that often lead to regret and a measure of shame.

Head Centre Practice:

My current Head Centred Practice (mainly for anxiety) involves some kind of 3-minute quick realignment of Body-Heart-Mind when feeling lost, off-course, out of sorts. Also reading or listening to texts that feed my curiosity and interests, listening to podcasts, as well as other heady distractions. Again, probably much like you, I occasionally resort to less healthy, immediate remedies or gratifications when feeling anxious or lost. While I often regret these choices and they bring a tinge of shame, I try to recognize and accept my imperfections when these arise, and crack on as best I can with The Game.

If you predominantly identify as a head type (Enneagram 5,6,7) and find yourself prone to overthinking and detaching from emotions, you might want to place a greater emphasis on exploring various grounding exercises (refer to the Body Section above) to foster a connection with your embodied being. Additionally, engaging in activities that evoke joy and passion can help you connect with your heart. Setting aside time for reflection is also beneficial to explore and integrate your emotions and thoughts.

If you like, at some point, let’s talk more about creating a good Body/Heart/Mind routine for you during the day, something that works well for your personality style as life circumstances.

Body Centre Reflective Questions

• What physical sensations do you notice upon waking? Are there any areas of tension or discomfort?
• How does your body respond to different types of movement, such as stretching, aerobic exercise, or relaxation techniques?
• What are some physical activities that make you feel grounded and present?
• How do you currently honour your body’s needs for nourishment, rest, and activity?
• Are there any specific times during the day when you feel disconnected from your body? What triggers this?

Heart Centre Reflective Questions

• What emotions are most prevalent for you in the morning? How do these emotions shift throughout the day?
• How do you currently attend to your emotional well-being? Are there practices or activities that evoke a sense of peace or joy?
• What are some challenges you face in maintaining emotional balance? Are there specific triggers?
• Are there moments when you feel emotionally reactive? What grounding techniques have you tried to manage these fluctuations?

Head Centre Reflective Questions

• What are the first thoughts that come to mind upon waking? How do these thoughts influence your mood and actions?
• How do you currently engage your cognitive faculties in a way that is both stimulating and grounding?
• Are there specific times or situations when you find yourself lost in thought or disconnected from your body and emotions?
• What are some practices that help you integrate cognitive understanding with emotional and physical experience?
• How do you navigate the balance between analytical thinking and intuitive knowing?

Integration Reflective Questions

• How do you currently align your Body, Heart, and Mind centres in your daily routine?
• Are there specific practices that help you integrate these centres? What are they?
• What challenges do you face in maintaining this alignment? Are there any recurring patterns?
• How does your daily routine reflect your evolutionary and psycho-spiritual understanding of these centres?
• What are some ways you can adapt your routine to better serve the integration of these centres?

Consider for a moment the duality of your bifocal self or selves. This duality can create extreme cognitive dissonance and conflict both within ourselves and within our relationships, bringing confusion and uncertainty into our inner and outer worlds.

Unfortunately, the standard head hardware doesn’t help in these matters. The human brain, with its dual nature and architecture, often finds itself in a tug-of-war between its left and right hemispheres. The left hemisphere (LH) seeks certainty, fixity, and a structured approach to life’s challenges, craving clear narratives, theoretical solutions, and self-maximising outcomes. In contrast, the right hemisphere (RH) embraces ambiguity, change, and a more holistic view, valuing unique narratives, experiential understanding, and placing emphasis on empathy and compassion both towards oneself and others.

In light of this internal dichotomy, which mirrors the complexities of our human relationships and the scarcity quite often of peace within and in our relationships, emerges a practice I like to call One True Friend.

Each day, preferably first thing in the morning, the idea would be to write a letter or email from your suffering or conflicted self, articulating your thoughts, feelings, and struggles.

Write it, and then forget about it. Later, or the following day howeer, you will be respond to this letter from your more loving, “right hemisphere self”, offering the kind of care and attention probably only you know how give in a way that won’t be triggering or confuse yourself further. Some sort of authentic, no-BS in sightm compassion, understanding, and support. The idea of this practice is to tap into these different hemispheres so as to fosters a more integrated relationship within the self, allowing for the expression of both light and shade, a bit like two melodic lines playing over each other in a piece of Bach.

True friendship, akin to the harmonious interplay between the hemispheres, is regrettably rare in our internal to-and-for. Our viritual or real-world friends, including our romantic partners or spouses, can often only fully warm to us when we are able to dance and stride through life with them. These are what we might call fair-weather friends, or fair-weather partners. But even the true-ish friend, life partner, someone you feel you can bring your whole self into a relationship with, all the light and all the shade, will never succeed in tracking you the way you can track and tune into your self.

The problem is that the “freaking out” part of us is often not connecting with our Wise Mind, and that’s where something like OTF is designed to help with.

The greatest pleasure I find in OTF is that it completely eradicates that whole Erving Goffman frontstage-backstage game. All those  masks and costumes we put on in order to fit into our various social settings can be laid to one side with our One True Friend. It is only with our One True Friend you might say that we are free to be our selves fully. Some might even call this part of us “God”, even if we don’t necessarily believe in the notion of sky parents presented to us by our faith-based religions.

Talk is cheap and language is slippery, so let’s be clear what we mean by One True Friend through analysing those three very simple words beyond their Latin and Greek and Anglo-Saxon roots to the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) substrate of English and other languages.

ONE: from the PIE root *oi-no- “one, unique”. Which is to say: one specific human consciousness in dialogue with another human consciousness, inne or outer. Related words: alone, lonely, non-, none, null, atone, once, unanimous, unilateral, universal, unison, university and unicorn. 

TRUE: from the PIE root *deru- or *dreu meaning “firm, solid, steadfast,” with a specialized sense of “wood,” “tree” and other derivatives referring to objects made from wood. True, faithful, steadfast, trustworthy and honest as a tree we might say, or the wooden chairs, table bookshelves still made from that strong and true tree. Other words sharing the same root:  Druid, during, duration, dour, duress, endure, shelter, betrothed, trough, truth, and trust.

FRIEND: from Proto-Indo-European root *pri- meaning “to love”, also: “free, not in bondage, acting of one’s own will”. Related words include: afraid, affray, free, freedom, Friday. 

You could of course do something like this with an AI buddy like Chat GPT or Claude.ai (I have tried) but I still, as of now, prefer this more creative ritualised exchange exchange between the dark/ugly/suffering “me” and the wise/kind/therapist “me”.

I’d be interested what your experiene of this practice might be if you were to give it a go.

Here’s to friendship.

Here are a couple of terms that I have found really useful when thinking about creating my Life As A Game Manual:

Games as voluntary obstacles:

Bernard Suits’ theory of games as voluntary obstacles illuminates a paradoxical human desire – to intentionally introduce hardship into activities for the sake of greater fulfillment. Why do we gravitate toward unnecessary challenges, rules, and limitations?

Philosophically, we can understand this through concepts like self-actualization. By stretching our capacities and gaining mastery within arbitrary difficulties, we feel more alive. A rock climber scaling a cliff with only their hands touches excellence. A chess player conquering a mental obstacle course likewise fulfills potential. We have a need to exercise agency against resistance.

Games also provide structure and focus for our agency. Much of life lacks defined objectives and measures of progress. Games concentrate and distill motivation into a compressed space rich with quantifiable decision points, clear milestones, and incremental betterment. This provides satisfaction missing from diffuse real-world activities. Obstacles give shape and bite to the exercise of agency.

Finally, voluntarily confronting unnecessary obstacles allows us to practice coping skills in low-stakes environments. Real life imposes plenty of involuntary difficulties. Games let us willingly take on challenges for the sake of growth, enjoying relative freedom from harsh consequences. They grant safe spaces to fail, experiment, and steel our agency against uncertainty. We thus cultivate resilience off the field of play.

Striving play vs achievement play:

Bernard Suits’ concepts of striving play versus achievement play capture two distinct motivational orientations. Their contrasts shed light on the subjective value and rewards we pursue through games.

Achievement-oriented players are extrinsically driven – they play to win according to defined metrics of success. Victory itself is the objective. The game becomes instrumental, a means to the glory of measurable victory. Beating opponents provides an ego payoff. Achievement-seeking players often thrive on competition and hierarchical ranking.

Striving-focused players are intrinsically motivated. The game world and its challenges provide their own psychic rewards, irrespective of defined outcomes. One engages fully with each moment of the game for the activity’s own sake. Striving players relish the game rituals themselves, savoring execution.

We can further connect this to notions of personal development. Achievement-seekers play to triumph over others and progress themselves. Strivers play to immerse themselves completely in an activity and actualize their potentials moment-to-moment therein. We contain both orientations in varying degrees. But a striving mindset may correlate with long-term growth and fulfillment.

The Paradox of Tragedy:

The question of why we willingly expose ourselves to artistic tragedy connects deeply to philosophical debates about human nature. Perhaps we crave tragedy as a form of emotional and psychological catharsis, purging pent-up feelings. But then why not seek direct catharsis rather than diluted fictional events?

Alternatively, perhaps artificial suffering provides a space of empathetic exploration – a chance to expanded our moral imagination by inhabiting difficult scenarios. But then why choose scenarios of loss over inspiration? Why not sympathize with more uplifting material?

There may simply be aesthetic pleasure in complex emotional textures themselves. But this fails to address why unpleasant emotions would provide aesthetic enrichment. Tragedy does not universally delight us.

No single theory fully resolves the paradox. Fundamentally, our allure towards the tragic in art may stem from unconscious drives beyond tidy explanation. We contain multitudes, including an inscrutable attraction towards darkness. Tragic art offers a fertile ground for philosophizing about the contradictory landscapes of the human psyche. It highlights the limits of reason in plumbing our aesthetic and emotional depths.

The magic circle:

The “magic circle” concept powerfully captures the sense in which games transport us to spaces apart, where normal rules are suspended. Games promise liberation – temporary escape from customs, consequences, and social contracts into a realm permitting otherwise unthinkable thoughts and deeds.

This touches philosophically on notions of the carnivalesque, a trope of inversion, chaos, and unrestrained freedom. Through occults games, we ritualistically dispense with norms and tap into deviant potentials. We get to experimentally unleash disowned portions of identity and psychology.

Of course, as the theory notes, this overturns social reality, not inner morality. Unthinkable acts in games retain their meaning externally. But we thirst for spaces permitting transgression without accountability. And so the magic circle fulfills a deep human longing present since antiquity – permission to invert, resist, and subvert the status quo without repercussion.

Games thus provide vital pressure valves for slackening the chokeholds of socialization and convention. They allow us to be more than our prescribed roles. In the absence of genuine social transformation, the magic circles carved out in rarified play spaces quench profound desires for liberation. Their enchanted and transformative nature helps explain games’ power over human behavior and experience.

There are always more layers and perspectives to explore on these rich philosophical issues. Please let me know if you would like me to expand my analysis further on any concept specifically!

When a crisis, a very stressful or painful event, a trauma occurs in our lives, it can often feel like we’ve stepped out during the first act of a play, or game, or football match, gone to the lavatory or to get a drink, and upon returning for the second half of this thing, the plot or “rules” of the game, seem no longer applicable.

This is often what anxiety and depression signal in our lives, as well as all the other stressors of human existence. We are suddenly reminded at a very deep level that we have lost some or maybe a great deal of sense of our purpose, our “mojo” on this stage of life; lost the plot as it were. The old rules no longer apply, but we don’t seem to have any new ones to replace them with.

Many of us will have experienced this feeling of being caught between an existential, even Sisyphean rock and a hard place like this because life itself holds this narrative arc in its unfolding. In the First Act, and maybe in the Second, we play our roles according to societal norms and expectations unless we are out-and-out rebels. But often, some sort of turning point arrives, marking the transition to Act II or III, and this transition often involves suffering.

Crisis might be a more appropriate word. Any life crisis is painful because it reveals to us that the “rules” or reason for playing the game has shifted. The goals that were propelling us forwards—achievement, status, material gains—now have a different salience to them; they may even feel untrue, or out of reach. Our motivations for doing what we once did, or have always done, no longer hold, even though we are probably still continuing to strive for all that socially conditioned stuff, because: the Matrix.

And so we are thrust into disturbing and unknown territory, in Act II. The second half of the game, if we’re still on a football pitch, might still offer guidelines, but no guideline fully makes sense, and usually this happens with little warning and a great deal of emotional turbulence.

The key question now has to be: how do we find our balance, find direction and fulfilment when the “game” of life has changed for us in some fundamental way? How do we come up with a new set of rules or guidelines, a new set of “life hacks” to guide us forward in whatever realm of intelligence we currently are most lost in: head (cognitive), heart (emotional), or body (instinctual)?

THE BEGINNING OF THE SECOND ACT

This second act often commences with the loss of something—of youth, of health, of a person we love, or maybe of a previously held dream or fantasy. Loss or traumatic stress is followed by pain, be it an emotional, physical, or just purely circumstantial level. Is there some way to make use of this pain, to crack our minds and hearts open in some new way, to offer wisdom through some kind of expansion of perspective or tolerance?

If life is a play, and your life crisis is the end of one act, the beginning of another, how do we even start to craft Act II, or Act III? What personal, self-fashioned guidelines might help us navigate all this new ambiguity and suffering?

Life As A Game

The reason I’m framing this eternal existential question in this not entirely novel, but perhaps still useful way is because I’m reading a book at the moment by a philosopher of games called C. Thi Nguyen called Games: Agency As Art.

I have learnt so much about life and games, and the intersection of the two, from C. Thi Nguyen’s book. Crucial LAAG concepts like games as “voluntary obstacles”, striving play (especially aesthetic striving) vs. achievement play, and the idea of games, as well as certain life activities inviting us into a “magic circle”.

I also really love watching him on YouTube because he’s incredibly smart but also hilarious.

Perhaps some of the “work” the culture expects us to do in therapy (for are we not supposed to be “working” as opposed to enjoying ourselves?) might be to give some time to talking about, or maybe even writing for ourselves a kind of Life As A Game Manual?

Not one we have to adhere to forever, or even a year, but certainly one that will help us deal with where the game life has thrust us right now. Perhaps envisaging new rules or roles we might want to play, updating our suppositions or attitudes, our various learnt “scripts” with regard to rules and narratives that we once played, pay-offs we once hoped to get in Act 1, but now are needing something else.

Would not such a manual hold a very precious compass for us in terms of charting our second act? The questions it poses might also strip away some of the masks we have to wear in Act I, revealing what matters most to us now, and what will make our Second Act, our ongoing lives, more enjoyable, peaceful, or meaningful.

With this idea in mind, I thought I might pitch my idea to CHAT GPT as a pre or post-crisis “Life As A Game Manual”.

What would constitute the chapters of this manual, I asked the LLM Oracle? Could these chapters be further broken down into sub-chapters, each accompanied by a series of questions, thereby rendering the workbook version of the manual ready for utilisation by me or patients?

Five seconds later it beautifully obliged. Just the bare bones of a Life As A Game Manual outline though, so I nudged it towards crafting for us three key reflection questions for each of its suggested chapter headings.

These questions, I suggested, should be designed to provoke “deep, authentic, and potentially uncomfortable reflections from head, heart, and body intelligence systems, drawing inspiration from some of the thinking around these human “Operating Systems” from neuroscientists, psychiatrists, and anyone else they could find to illuminate us.

I also asked it to envision these questions as having been further formulated trialled, and no doubt improved upon by the clinical or lived experience of psychologists, psychotherapists, and spiritual practitioners, shamans, and whoever else they wanted to bring in for guidance, especially with regard to experts in quarter-life crisis, or mid-life crisis. Heck, why not just include ALL trauma, ALL crises, change, transitions, beginning with that of being born as Otto Rank initially reminded us, and everything else that follows.

“Please consult a diverse array of races and genders in terms of your research,” I further prompted so as to make it as inclusive as possible, before pressing SEND.

I know this all sounds like a bit of a faff, but getting the best out of AI I have discovered requires having to be incredibly, incredibly INCREDIBLY specific, often to a somewhat frustrating and laborious degree.

It is like (I imagine, for I have never had the pleasure/pain of doing this myself) having to micro-manage a very amenable and somewhat able intern who is also painfully inept and non-proactive, someone who just hangs around the office waiting to be spoon-fed highly specific instructions (prompt after carefully engineered prompt) returning with work that is a little like what we asked for, but showing no initiative whatsoever for getting the work to a standard that you actually require, which winds you up unitl the point in which you begin to wonder whether the job might have been done more quickly by you just using our own organic but often quite slothful intelligence.

I still didn’t like the stuff GPT was coming up with at this point, but third time lucky I got what I’d been casting around for and out popped the following.

LIFE AS A GAME: THE MANUAL

Chapter 1: Voluntary Obstacles – Embracing Life’s Challenges

Explanation: In games, players willingly take on challenges and obstacles to make the activity satisfying and meaningful. Similarly, viewing life’s difficulties as voluntary obstacles can shape our approach to whatever form of suffering we are currently experiencing and letting go.

1. Can you think of a challenge in your life that, if approached like a game, might feel more manageable or even satisfying to tackle?

2. Have you ever chosen to face a difficult situation and found unexpected rewards in doing so?

3. How might seeing life’s changes as challenges to be overcome, rather than burdens, change your perspective on those classic “markers” of existence: ageing (also change/loss), sickness or degradation (including mental ill health unease, anxiety, depression, confusion), and finally good old death?

Chapter 2: The Magic Circle – Nurturing Relationships

Explanation: The “magic circle” represents a safe space in games where different rules apply, and actions don’t have real-world consequences. This concept can be applied to create nurturing spaces in relationships.

1. Can you think of a way to create a “magic circle” in any/all of your relationships, a safe space where openness and understanding are prioritised? Start by thinking about the relationship you have with yourself and your One True Friend.

2. Have you ever experienced a situation where a game or playful activity helped resolve a conflict or deepen a bond?

3. How might creating such safe spaces help you form and maintain meaningful relationships within and without?

Chapter 3: Stupid Games & Recalcitrance – Self-Care and Creativity

Explanation: “Stupid games” bring joy through playful failure, while “recalcitrance” represents the creative struggle against limitations. Combining these concepts can lead to innovative self-care practices.

1. Can you recall a time when embracing failure or limitations led to joy, relief, or a creative solution?

2. How might incorporating playful and creative elements into your routine contribute to your well-being?

3. Can you think of a way to turn a limitation or challenge into an opportunity for creativity and self-care?

Chapter 4: Emergent vs Fixed Narrative – Crafting Meaning and Purpose

Explanation: Games can have fixed stories or allow players to create their own narratives. Balancing these approaches can help craft a meaningful life story.

1. How do you balance following a set path and creating your own story in your life?

2. Can you share a time when you felt like the author of your own story, and how it contributed to your sense of purpose?

3. How might embracing both structure and freedom help you lead a richer and more fulfilling life? What would the first steps here look like?

Chapter 5: The Paradox of Tragedy – Facing Mortality with Insight

Explanation: The paradox of tragedy explores why we find enjoyment in art that induces sadness or fear. Engaging with such themes can provide insights into mortality and the value of life.

1. Have you ever found comfort or insight in a story, film, or game with dark or tragic themes?

2. How might exploring such themes help you come to terms with life’s uncertainties and your own mortality?

3. Can you think of a way that engaging with challenging themes (such as in journalling, or a One True Friend practice, or perhaps more traditional prayer) could provide comfort or understanding regarding the end of life?

Conclusion: Games as Voluntary or Aesthetic Obstacles and Striving Play – Moving Forward with Intention

Explanation: Games offer challenges and intrinsic joy through participation. Applying these principles can influence our outlook on life and future intentions.

1. Reflecting on the concepts discussed, how might viewing challenges as voluntary obstacles and finding joy in participation influence your life?

2. Can you envision applying the joy of participation to overcome challenges and foster hope in your future journey?

3. What specific steps inspired by these concepts will you take to live more intentionally and meaningfully?

Why Produce One of these LAAG Manuals for yourself?

My totally cheery but also somewhat Woody Allenesque philosophy on life is that at an existential level one is either emerging from a crisis, OR actually having a crisis, OR emerging from having been in some crisis. But of course always with the dream to be totally, blissfully and forever crisis-free.

Wherever you or I might fall on that crisis see-saw or merry-go-round, some ‘True Friend’ aspect of us might hopefully guide us, or be guided to guide us, towards focusing on the kind of self-help or therapy that we need.

This might include a very conscious writing up of our Act II intentions as a kind of “manual” of sorts, something which allows us to live aligned with our most satisfying values but also with all three intelligence centres we possess: “body”, “heart”, and “mind” aligned.

1. Body Centre (Instinctual Intelligence):
Surface Level (Psychological): The body centre might be associated with instinct, action, and groundedness. It seeks autonomy and strength, a knowing where we stand, having a “position” (emotionally, physically, conceptually) but this can also sometimes lead to impulsivity and a disconnection from the head and heart centres, being as it is the most foundational/animal/unconscious of the three centres.
Deeper Level (Psycho-Spiritual): Exploring further, the body centre might be viewed as a vessel of embodied wisdom, the alchemical crucible within which all the head and heart stuff happens, as well as our only connection to the natural world, to what is “real” rather than what is swirling around in the swirly parts of us. This might potentially offer us ways to be more present, trusting the intelligence of this silent but wise companion, and aligning us with its rhythms – the rhythms of life, and perhaps even the universe.

2.Heart Centre (Emotional Intelligence):
Surface Level (Psychological): The heart centre is potentially where emotions, empathy, and connection might be said to reside. It is in within this Operating System that we seek love, acceptance, and identity, which can also sometimes manifest as a kind dependency on external validation.
Deeper Level (Psycho-Spiritual): Moving inward, the heart centre could be seen as potentially offering us a space for greater love and interconnectedness, both within ourselves, but maybe also with others. This is where we also feel hope and seek some sense of unity with everything inside us, as well as all beings, transcending the limitations of our desires and attachments.

3. Head Centre (Intellectual Intelligence):
Surface Level (Psychological): The head centre might be seen as the domain of cognition, analysis, and planning. It seemingly seeks understanding, clarity, and security, which can sometimes lead to a tendency for overthinking and detachment from the present moment.
Deeper Level (Psycho-Spiritual): Delving deeper, one might consider the head centre not merely as a cognitive tool but as a potential portal to inner wisdom, guidance and deep understanding/knowing. At this level it becomes more about (perhaps?) quieting the mind to tune into more intuitive knowing, trying to see our reality beyond the illusions/bars/blocks of the ego.

The Life Manual: Integrated Gamification

To be fully ourselves, to be as “whole” as we can be as bifocal beings, integration is potentially not just about balance but a certain kind of transcendence, a unification of thought, emotion, and instinct into a coherent whole. Broadly speaking and often naffly expressed, this might involve a willingness to look beyond the “psychological”/ego-based understanding of each centre and open ourselves to delving into those psycho-spiritual seas, swimming for pearls deep down in the depths of ourselves.

The Life As A Game Manual is not a prescriptive piece of psychotherapeutic “homework” but rather an invitation to explore, reflect, and perhaps even “play” with your life and experience.

Whether you are in crisis, emerging from one, or simply seeking greater clarity and purpose, this manual (regardless of whether I prompt-engineered it out of GPT or not) offers potentially a framework for navigating the complexities of existence.

Fundamentally what I would like to think, and hold onto for myself (and for everyone else) is that life is like a game: full of challenges and opportunities, but also with the potential for this special kind of purposeful or “aesthetic striving” which makes the game, whatever game we’re playing meaningful and worthwhile to us in some way.

So, grab a pen, or create a Google Document on your computer, open your heart and mind, and let the game begin.

Accepting (Complacent), Calm (Apathetic), Compassionate (Indecisive), Easygoing (Disengaged), Empathetic (Enmeshed), Harmonious (Conflict-Averse), Kind (People-Pleasing), Open-minded (Unfocused), Patient (Stagnant), Peaceful (Passive), Receptive (Indifferent), Relaxed (Lazy), Supportive (Enabling), Understanding (Noncommittal), Reserved (Unresponsive)

For this reason, psychotherapy of any sort is often about trying to help our Shadow Lens become better integrated with our Clarity Lens.

Assertive (Aggressive), Confident (Intimidating), Courageous (Reckless), Decisive (Impulsive), Direct (Blunt), Empowering (Overbearing), Generous (Manipulative), Independent (Isolated), Inspirational (Unrealistic), Just (Unyielding), Protective (Smothering), Resilient (Insensitive), Strong (Dominating), Visionary (Impractical), Willful (Stubborn)

For this reason, psychotherapy of any sort is often about trying to help our Shadow Lens become better integrated with our Clarity Lens.

Adventurous (Rash), Appreciative (Indulgent), Cheerful (Superficial), Creative (Scattered), Energetic (Restless), Enthusiastic (Overbearing), Excited (Impulsive), Flexible (Inconsistent), Fun (Frivolous), Joyful (Escapist), Optimistic (Naive), Playful (Childish), Positive (Ignoring), Spontaneous (Unpredictable), Vivacious (Overwhelming)

Alert (Anxious), Committed (Stubborn), Courageous (Reckless), Dependable (Clingy), Dutiful (Obligated), Engaged (Intrusive), Hardworking (Rigid), Loyal (Dependent), Observant (Skeptical), Practical (Limited), Protective (Controlling), Reliable (Predictable), Responsible (Overwhelmed), Supportive (Enabling), Trustworthy (Gullible)

Perhaps the most fascinating yet paradoxical thing about personality is that our greatest strengths are also a kind of weakness. Just as that bifocal lens of Self allows us to see both near and far, our most positive traits also encapsulate our shadow sides.

Analytical (Overthinking), Cerebral (Detached), Curious (Invasive), Focused (Obsessive), Independent (Aloof), Innovative (Impractical), Insightful (Overanalytical), Intelligent (Pedantic), Inventive (Complicated), Objective (Dispassionate), Perceptive (Skeptical), Private (Withholding), Rational (Cold), Reflective (Introverted), Wise (Know-It-All)

–Type Five: Fears & Desires, Key Motivations and Levels of Functioning

–Three Ways To Be Five: Enneagram Five Subtypes (Self-Preservation, Sexual, Social)

–Working Therapeutically with an Enneagram Five (Investigator) Personality Style

“He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how,” wrote the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. When we are feeling confused, troubled, or out of sorts, our days often dissolve into suffering-focused atrophy. Structuring daily routines around meaningful acts can be key for mental health. Another philosopher, Jim Carrey put it this way: “You can fail at what you don’t want, so you might as well take a chance on doing what you love.” Taking a chance on passionate work and purpose requires focus, but even more importantly: routine.

The other day I happened upon a video by Lex Fridman outlining his daily routine. Now, I’m not suggesting we should all be living our lives in this particular way. But one thing that is very clear is that here is somebody who feels they are living a fulfilling life, and there seems to be something connected to his structured routine.

One way of thinking about it is that we could set up each of our days as a kind of three act play in our minds. Each act needs to be meaningful and connect with different values and aspects of our lives that we consider to be truly important.

Lex’s Three Act Play For His Day & Life

ACT ONE: Wakes up after 6-8 hours of sleep – Goes through a spoken mantra reflecting on: Rules and constraints around addictions like social media, and other aspects of his life that cause or promote suffering – Gratitude and the idea that today could be his last day alive – Brief reflection on the 5-year goals he wants to achieve – Nearer term goals for the year ahead – Visualizing getting all his tasks done successfully that day – Drinks 1 liter of water and makes coffee followed by a – 4-hour deep work session focused on: – One single difficult task requiring intense focus – No interruptions except short breaks for water/bathroom – Uses standing desk and ergonomic keyboard – Works on coding mobile app with TensorFlow

BREAK: Exercises for about an hour (does a run followed by David Goggins’ Nickels and Dimes workout)

ACT TWO: Second 4-hour deep work session focused on: – Continuing to work on the same difficult coding task – Removing all distractions and focusing mind – No eating, just water and salt pills – Powering through even if frustrated, waiting for breakthrough – Standing desk, ergonomic keyboard – Feels like a “sprint” and big accomplishment

BREAK: Breaks 18+ hour fast with large meal of meat & vegetables

ACT THREE: Another 4-hour, more flexible block: Goes through emails for up to 1 hour – Does video editing and podcast prep for 2 hours – Finishes up coding task from earlier (1 hour) –

WIND-DOWN/FUN: Academic paper reading (1 hour), focused –  Thinking deeply about implications beyond the paper – Setting timer to stay focused – Literature reading (1+ hour) – Currently reading Dostoyevsky novels – Alternates between desk and bed – Listens in original Russian at times – Nightly gratitude reflection – Continues reading in bed until falling asleep

In some way, the three act play day also mirrors our whole lives, as each day is a microcosm of life itself. We emerge out of oblivion – the oblivion of sleep in this case – into consciousness. And then, whether we like it or not, we are awake until we drift back into oblivion.

The first act might be seen as that part of our lives leading up to what we call middle-age, which often involves education, career building, and family. The second act is what we live until retirement, dedicating ourselves to work and passions. And the third act is our later years, the unwinding and winding down of life until its end.

Similarly, Lex structures his day around three meaningful acts. His first act is a morning routine where he focuses his mind, sets rules and goals, and prepares for focused work. This is analogous to the first act of life, where we ready ourselves for the productive years ahead.

The second act of Lex’s day is deep, distraction-free work on his hardest projects. This middle portion dedicated to meaningful work mirrors the second act of life, where we devote ourselves to career and purpose.

Finally, Lex’s third act is an evening wind-down with lighter work and reading literature. As with the third act of life, this creates a transition to rest and reflection as the day comes to a close.

Of course, we need not follow Lex’s exact routine, which would be impossible for many of us. But the concept of structuring one’s day, and even one’s life, into three meaningful acts focused on purpose provides a template for fulfillment. The acts bring routine, while the focus on meaningful goals and values within each one brings a sense of purpose.

So in the end, perhaps a life well-lived is one crafted around three acts, whether they be morning, afternoon, and evening, or childhood, adulthood, and old age. If we want fulfillment in our lives (and who doesn’t), we might want to write and then live our own unique three-part play and strive to act it out on a daily basis.

Perhaps the most fascinating yet paradoxical thing about personality is that our greatest strengths are also a kind of weakness. Just as that bifocal lens of Self allows us to see both near and far, our most positive traits also encapsulate our shadow sides.

Authentic (Melodramatic), Creative (Capricious), Expressive (Overemotional), Inspiring (Manipulative), Intuitive (Whimsical), Original (Eccentric), Passionate (Tempestuous), Perceptive (Oversensitive), Romantic (Fantasizing), Sensitive (Fragile), Spiritual (Escapist), Supportive (Clingy), Thoughtful (Navel-Gazing), Unique (Isolated), Understanding (Indulgent)

Adaptive (Overzealous), Ambitious (Cutthroat), Confident (Arrogant), Driven (Relentless), Efficient (Impersonal), Goal-Oriented (Single-Minded), Motivated (Obsessive), Optimistic (Unrealistic), Organized (Controlling), Productive (Workaholic), Successful (Elitist), Tenacious (Stubborn), Thriving (Overcommitted), Versatile (Inconsistent), Winning (Competitive)

–Three Ways To Be Two: Enneagram Two Subtypes (Self-Preservation, Sexual, Social)

–Working Therapeutically with an Enneagram Two (Helper) Personality Style

Accurate (Rigid), Committed (Overzealous), Discerning (Judgmental), Ethical (Self-Righteous), Fair (Unyielding), Idealistic (Impractical), Organized (Inflexible), Principled (Dogmatic), Purposeful (Single-Minded), Rational (Dismissive), Responsible (Overburdened), Self-Controlled (Repressed), Sensible (Conservative), Thorough (Perfectionistic), Wise (Know-It-All)

Charles Foster: Being a Human Adventures in Forty Thousand Years of Consciousness (2022)

We quickly lose not only the ability to be free but also the desire to be free. That desire has been almost completely extinguished today. Given a choice between air-conditioned slavery with a regular income and happy, penniless anarchy in a shed looking at the mountains, almost all of us, without hesitation, opt for the slavery. At some level we know it’s a bad choice, and we hate being reminded of the choice. Cain knows not only that he’s less happy than Abel, but also that Abel is his superior. When Abel, leading his wolf on a string, dances across Cain’s path as Cain’s on the way to the office, Cain senses Abel’s natural aristocracy and it makes him mad. And so Cain tries to destroy Abel, herding him and his family into concentration camps, requiring him to have an ID card and a passport to stop the wandering that Cain so fears and envies, and firing tear gas at him at Occupy demonstrations.

—

The earliest writing was Sumerian. It was pictographic, and still nodded deferentially to the world outside human heads, but soon the pictures were ousted by the lines (yes, lines again) of Sumerian cuneiform – the aggressive, rapacious stabs of a man-made, man-held stylus into natural clay, with which Mesopotamia remade the world in its own image. Purely oral cultures had demanded relationship – between the teller and the hearer and the teller and the source. To gather a story, an oral storyteller has to go out into the wilds of experience, tune their ear to the tones in which the wild, if it is in the mood, chooses to render the story, ask the source’s permission to pluck the story, pledge not to use it in a way contrary to the source’s intention, bow as they walk backwards out of the wild, as the Hasidim walk backwards from the Western Wall in Jerusalem so as not to slight the presence that sits there, tell the story faithfully around fires and bind listeners, on the pain of societal death, to keep telling the story.

When there’s writing, it’s different: someone sits in a room making eternal, binding lines from the thoughts in their head – lines that derive from no authority other than the head, lines constraining the future action and orientation of others just as surely as the line of a fence stops sheep from grazing where they want. To inscribe a list of debts or to detail a treaty is to tell a story just as much as to relate how that rock is the claw of a giant toad, or how your father gathered talismanic leaves, smoked a foul pipe and carried on leaving a vapour trail of coal tar soap long after his body was burned. There was another important and catastrophic stage in the creeping hegemony of written language. It did not happen in the Neolithic, but its seeds were sown there. It was the advent of alphabetic – phonetic – writing. Pictographs nodded to the non-human world, relying on a sketch of a tree or an ox to convey meaning. Phonetic writing severed language’s connection with and dependence on the natural world, and humans for the first time began to believe that language was a uniquely human possession. Until then – and throughout the Neolithic, despite all the charges I have levelled against it – the non-human world spoke and listened, though its accents were increasingly hard for humans to hear, and its stories increasingly disregarded, patronised and supplanted. Not until the alphabet was it presumed that the natural world was dumb.

—

The current state of consciousness studies is easily summarised. No one has the faintest idea about the point, nature or location of consciousness. ‘Give us time,’ plead the biologists. No, sorry. Time’s up. You’ve had 40,000 years or so. Not only have you made no progress, but there is nothing whatever to suggest that, with your dogmatic materialist view of the world, you could, given more time, make any progress, and a great deal to suggest that you couldn’t.

—

On the way from the wood to the train I snap a branch, and reflexively say ‘Sorry, forgive me,’ and find and eat an old blackberry and instinctively say ‘Thank you’. I’ve made some progress. Gratitude is the main defining characteristic of hunter–gatherer communities. It’s a gratitude rather different from the gratitude of the harvest festival.

—

All change – all change – has always and can only ever come from the edges. Nothing of any significance has ever come from the centre – from parliaments, from Cabinets, from boardrooms, from think-tanks with the ear of ministers. Evolution needs edges. Turn the world into a monoculture and you’ll have shorter lengths of edge, and thus less change, and thus less evolution. That’s bad news. Suppose that behavioural modernity began 40,000 years ago, that the Neolithic began 10,000 years ago and that we became modern, in the sense we now are, 1,000 years ago. (As we’ll see, I argue later in this book that this last transition was rather more recent than that.) Assume that each generation is twenty-five years. There have then been 1,600 behaviourally modern generations, 1,200 (75 per cent) of them upper Palaeolithic or Mesolithic. There have been forty modern generations: that’s 2½ per cent of the total human generations. If a human life time is seventy years, 75 per cent of a human life time is about fifty-three. Most of our development as individuals is done by the age of fifty-three. And most of our development as humans was done by the end of the upper Palaeolithic. We’re Pleistocene people.

If we start the story when anatomically modern Homo sapiens first appeared, 200,000 years ago, 95 per cent of our history has been as hunter–gatherers: as edge-creatures and hence, excitingly, as changing and change-bringing creatures. Now most of us are in the centre (of cities, of movements, of presumptions) and so have stopped changing either ourselves or the world in the way that the early human generations did. We think that we’re in a fast-changing world. Well, perhaps, but humans aren’t changing in the way that the upper Palaeolithic changed us. What we think of now as change is angst and dissolution. The changes on our watch are not the multiplication and refinement of nuance or the deepening of understanding. They are acts of vandalism: the spoliation of things, places and modes of being that are ontologically superior to us.

—

We look always to summer, thinking of winter as simply to be endured, but winter is when our sustaining fables sprout; it is when humans huddle together, making the relationships (and hence the differences) between them more obvious. Relationship and individuation both flourish in the dark. And the dark is more other – full of teeth and hair. It’s commonplace these days in certain circles to say that we’re part of the natural world. That’s wholly true and wholly untrue. Certainly when spring comes you can think that you’re simply part of the wood. But no one thinks they’re part of a wood that snarls. It was from the tension between the whole truth that we’re part of the natural world and the whole truth that we are not that human consciousness erupted, flowed out into the ice fields and solidified into the stuff from which we’re now made. I suppose there might be some comfort in these thoughts when we’re reflecting on the fact that one day we will go back into the dark and cold. Or perhaps not.

—

I’m beginning to think that no dramatic out-of-body experience is needed for the kindling of consciousness. Lots of staring into a fire will do instead. A fire turns literal creatures into symbolisers: it makes everyone a metaphorical and storytelling animal. A fire creates, and shows how the creator also destroys. It confounds the boundaries of matter. It makes gas from fluids and from solids. It eats wood, sleeps and is woken by human breath. It makes a nonsense of space. Though it can travel (as Tom and X carry it) as a tiny dark spark inside a black fungus ball, it can fill a forest. It births metaphors. And there’s no political philosophy that can’t be deduced from staring into a fire. Logs won’t catch without small twigs. Small twigs are both the death and the apotheosis of logs.

—

To enter a woman, say the shamans, is to enter another world, and the unsubtle male body doesn’t distinguish neatly between entering a vagina and occupying the body of a wildebeest.

—

Judaism was, and remains, the most suspicious of Nature. It feared any confusion between Creator and the created, and always saw the observation of boundaries as central to its mission. The boundaries, it claimed, were established at the Creation. We have seen them already: light/day, land creatures/ sea creatures, clean/unclean and so on. It didn’t help that – although many of the great festivals of Judaism are arranged around the agricultural year, and at Sukkot Jews are enjoined to live outdoors in transient shelters through which they can see the stars, and so remember their origin as wanderers – rabbinic Judaism was an essentially urban industry. Part of Israel’s big break from its Talmudic past was the birth of a new race of outdoor Jews – Jews who tended orange groves and hiked and fought in the desert. But for many of the world’s Jews, old habits die hard. The British Jewish writer Howard Jacobson observes of a Jewish protagonist in one of his novels that ‘In the highly improbable event of his being asked to nominate the one most un-Jewish thing he could think of [he] would have been hard pressed to decide between Nature [ … ] and football.’

(August 2023)

—

The Unquiet Grave (Cyril Connolly, 1944)

Impression of Jesus Christ after re-reading the Gospels: He thought he was the son of God, he disliked his parents, was a prig, a high-spirited and serious young man (where was he, what was he doing, between the ages of twelve and twenty-nine?) He felt an especial hatred for the Pharisees, the family, his hometown and adultery, and he may have been illegitimate; he had a macabre sense of humour; was overwhelmingly grateful to those who believed in him (‘Thou art Peter’), and extremely close to his elder cousin John, but though moulding himself on him, he was less ascetic. 

He was fond of wine and very partial to grapes and figs. More civilized than his cousin, he was yet deeply affected by his end, which warned him of what would be his own if he persisted. The death of John and the revelation of Messiahship at Cæsarea Philippi completely changed him: impatient, ironical and short-tempered, he was a true faith-healer, inspired by his sublime belief in himself and tragically betrayed by it. 

I can’t believe in his divinity, yet it is impossible not to admire his greatness, his majesty, his fatalistic intuition and that mixture of practical wisdom with sublime vision which he believed might save our world. His faith carried him through to the end, then wavered. 

Was there a secret understanding with John? John the Baptist, I feel, holds many clues. 

About the miracles I suspend judgement. But not about the Sermon on the Mount. Those loving dazzling teasing-tender promises are like a lifting of the human horror, the bursting of a great dam. How different he is from Buddha! 

“But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.

Let the rains descend. Let the floods come, and all winds blow. Let them beat upon your house, upon your head, until you are no more.

And when thou prayest, do this in secret. When thou hast shut thy door, write to the Inner Father, the Inner Reader, who knows and loves thee as you see and would love others. And that shall by thy reward.” 

—

Pascal’s ‘moi’ is Freud’s ‘Id’. Thus Pascal writes, ‘Le moi est haïssable . . . le moi a deux qualités: il est injuste en soi, en ce qu’il se fait centre de tout; il est incommode aux autres, en ce qu’il les veut asservir: car chaque moi est l’ennemi et voudrait être le tyran de tous les autres’. (In a word, the self has two qualities. It is unjust in itself in that it makes itself the center of everything; it is inconvenient to others in that it wants to enslave them, for each self is the enemy and would like to be the tyrant of all the others.)

—

The mystery of drugs: How did savages all over the world, in every climate, discover in frozen tundras or remote jungles the one plant, indistinguishable from so many others of the same species, which could, by a most elaborate process, bring them fantasies, intoxication, and freedom from care? How unless by help from the plants themselves? Opium-smokers in the East become surrounded by cats, dogs, birds and even spiders, who are attracted by the smell. The craving for the drug proceeds from the brain-cells which revolt and overrule the will. The Siberian tribes who eat Agaric say, ‘The Agaric orders me to do this or that’—the Hashish chewers experience a like sensation. Horses and cattle which become ‘indigo eaters’ continue to gorge till they drop dead. Though one of the rarest and most obscure drugs, Peotl gave its name to a range of uninhabited mountains where it is found. The Greeks and Romans looked on alcohol and opium as lovely twin reconcilers to living and dying presented to man by Dionysus and Morpheus,—God-given because of their extraordinary sympathy to us and because of the mystery attending their discovery. If man be part of nature, then his parasites may well understand him better than he knows.

Everything is a dangerous drug to me except reality, which is unendurable. Happiness is in the imagination. What we perform is always inferior to what we imagine; yet day-dreaming brings guilt; there is no happiness except through freedom from Angst and only creative work, communion with nature and helping others are Anxiety-free.

—

Art which is directly produced for the Community can never have the same withdrawn quality as that which is made out of the artist’s solitude. For this possesses the integrity and bleak exhilaration that are to be gained only from the absence of an audience and from communion with the primal sources of unconscious life. One cannot serve both beauty and power: ‘Le pouvoir est essentiellement stupide.’ A public figure can never be an artist and no artist should ever become one unless, his work being done, he should choose to retire into public life.

—

Intense emotion, a mixture of relief and despair, at reading Sainte-Beuve’s notebook Mes Poisons, and discovering ‘This is me.’ This Elegiac, as he styled himself, who quotes my favourite lines of Latin poetry and who sums up happiness as reading Tibullus in the country ‘avec une femme qu’on aime,’ who calls himself ‘le dernier des délicats,’ who loved, suffered and was disillusioned, and yet who recognized love as the true source of happiness, but who was skeptical of everyone and everything

—

In the jungles of South America grows a trumpet flower fourteen inches deep, and there too is found a moth with a proboscis of the same length, the one creature able to penetrate to the honey and so ensure the plant’s fertilization. I, Palinurus, am such an orchid, growing daily more untempting as I await the Visitor who never comes.

—

A mistake which is commonly made about neurotics is to suppose that they are interesting. It is not interesting to be always unhappy, engrossed with oneself, malignant or ungrateful, and never quite in touch with reality. Neurotics are heartless: as Baudelaire wrote ‘tout homme qui n’accepte pas les conditions de la vie vend son âme.’

—

Like the glow-worm; dowdy, minute, passive, yet full of mystery to the poet and erotic significance to its fellows; so everything and everybody eternally radiate a dim light for those who care to seek. 

The strawberry hidden under the last leaf cries, ‘Pick me’; the forgotten book, in the forgotten bookshop, screams to be discovered. The old house hidden in the hollow agitates itself violently at the approach of its pre-destined admirer. Dead authors cry ‘Read me’; dead friends say ‘Remember me’; dead ancestors whisper, ‘Unearth me’; dead places, ‘Revisit me’; and sympathetic spirits, living and dead, are continually trying to enter into communion. Physical or intellectual attraction between two people is a constant communication. Underneath the rational and voluntary world lies the involuntary, impulsive, integrated world, the world of Relation in which everything is one; where sympathy and antipathy are engrossed in their selective tug-of-war.

—

‘The self-torments of melancholiacs, which are without doubt pleasurable, signify a gratification of sadistic tendencies and of hate, both of which relate to an object and in this way have both been turned round upon the self. In the end the sufferers usually succeed in taking revenge, by the circuitous path of self-punishment, on the original object who occasioned the injury and who is usually to be found in their near neighbourhood. No neurotic harbours thoughts of suicide which are not murderous impulses against others redirected upon himself.’—FREUD.

—

When we decide to write, we should first consider the ingredients involved. Proportions of heart and head, of judgement and imagination. ‘A peach of an essay’, ‘a melon of a poem’, ‘a quince of a book’,—we must let ourselves be impregnated by an archetypal form. Then we should treat the personality with the right mixture till the glaze (style) is suitable,—‘for my philosophical novel with a milligramme of nostalgia, I am taking ephedrine twice a week, opium once—with a little mescaline to loosen up my imagery and a massage on the nape of the neck to stimulate the thalamus after the monthly orgy. I am writing two-thirds standing up in the early morning, one-third in the afternoon lying down. My supervisor is a Jungian.’

—

O sacred solitary empty mornings, tranquil meditation—fruit of book-case and clock-tick, of note-book and armchair; golden and rewarding silence, influence of sun-dappled plane-trees, far-off noises of birds and horses, possession beyond price of a few cubic feet of air and an hour of leisure! This vacuum of peace is the state from which art should proceed, for art is made by the alone for the alone, and now this cerulean atmosphere, which we should all be able to take for granted, has become an unattainable end. The reward of art is not fame or success but intoxication: that is why so many bad artists are unable to give it up.

—

Let us not forget Whoopee the lemur. Gentle and fearless, he passed four leafy years in the South of France. He would chase large dogs, advancing backwards and glaring through his hind legs, then jump chittering at them and pull their tails. He died through eating a poisoned fig laid down for rats. The children who saw him take the fruit tried to coax it from him, but he ran up a tree with it. There they watched him eat and die.

The French soldier said of the Chleuhs in Morocco, ‘Je les aime et je les tue’. So it is with the lemurs, black and grey bundles of vitality, eocene ancestors from whom we are all descended, whose sun-greeting call some hold to be the origin of the word ‘Ra’ and thus of human language,—we have treated these kings in exile as we used Maoris and Marquesas islanders or the whistling Guanches of Teneriffe,—all those golden island-races, famous for beauty, whom Europe took to its shabby heart to exploit and ruin. To have set foot in Lemuria, writes Cyril Connolly,  is to have been close to the mysterious sources of existence, to have known what it is to live wholly in the present, to soar through the green world four yards above the ground, to experience sun, warmth, love and pleasure as intolerably as we glimpse them in a waking dream, and to have heard that heart-rendering cry of the lonely or abandoned which goes back to our primaeval dawn. Wild ghost faces from a lost continent who soon will be extinct. 

—

‘Your time is short, watery one. What do you believe?’ ‘I believe in two-faced truth, in the Either, the Or and the Holy Both. I believe that if a statement is true then its opposite must be true. (Aristotle: ‘The knowledge of opposites is one.’) I believe…[to write]

—

Un Chien Andalou reminds us of the grandeur of conflict inherent in romantic love, the truth that the heart is made to be broken, and after it has mended, to be broken again. For romantic love, the supreme intoxication of which we are capable, is more than an intensifying of life; it is a defiance of it and belongs to those evasions of reality through excessive stimulus which Spinoza called ‘titivations’. By the law of diminishing returns our desperate century forfeits the chance of being happy and, because it finds happiness insipid, our world is regressing to chaos. Why? Because, as in the days of the Delphic Oracle, happiness consists in temperance and self-knowledge, and these are now beyond the reach of ordinary people who, owing to the pursuit of violent sensation, can no longer distinguish between pleasure and pain.

(August, 2023)

—

Throughout history, humanity has been driven by origin myths – stories that imbue our existence with meaning and purpose. SETI is one of modernity’s origin myth. Our search for extraterrestrial intelligence is akin to a profile on a dating app. Every dating profile has the narcissistic intent of seeking another who is also quite predominantly your own ego ideal, how you would like to be seen and admired, even loved. 

Beyond that, we seek our creators. Not just our parents, but the distant gods who engineered those OG Homo sapiens, as well as the current crop.

But the cold, hard truth is that, after 70 years of searching, we have no evidence that alien civilizations exist, let alone that they would communicate using our parochial constructs of maths and logic. What does mathematics even mean to a jellyfish-like creature floating in the methane seas of GJ 1214b? Nothing. Yet like all myths before this one, SETI reveals more about human psychology and delusion than cosmic reality. Our desire to find alien intelligence reflects our loneliness, as well as a profound need for transcendence, springing from another yearning, that for meaning and purpose – a craving that inspires art as well as all the wars and squabbles we’ve ever participated in. 

SETI is really just another myth that human civilization has created to feel less alone in the vast, harsh universe. The silent gulf of space offers no validation of our concerns. The cosmos is utterly indifferent to our hopes and fears. Why not seek meaning through embodied human relationships, as opposed to mathematical messages from the stars or a social media app, we chide ourselves? And then once more we return to our handheld devices and continue swiping on our signs and symbols, up and down, left and right. 

-Massimo Pigluicci

—

Little Paddocks is a closed and cosy setting for a murder, but A Murder Is Announced is also a story about how a society has changed, how postwar Britain is a different, less settled country. For the murder to make sense, it must be true that somebody isn’t who we think they are – but who do we think they are? How do we know who is and who isn’t what they seem to be? How do the characters know? In essence, that is what detective fiction is: a mystery about which of a particular cast of characters isn’t who they say they are. And that, I suggest, is a, perhaps even the, core reason for Christie’s appeal to so many readers in so many different times and places. Just as her work is formalist without being modernist, her preoccupation with identity, with the constructed nature of character and society, is a modernist preoccupation, expressed through a deliberately popular and accessible medium. Her work is a cocktail of orderly settings and deep malignity, of comfiness and coldness, and at its heart it asks one of the most basic questions of all, modernity’s recurring preoccupation: who are you?

https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v40/n24/john-lanchester/the-case-of-agatha-christie

—

The nature of prose, Valery said, is to perish. Poetry lasts because it gives the ambiguous and ever- changing pleasure of being both a statement and a song. 

-KENNETH KOCH, Making Your Own Days (Friday, 8 November, 2019)

—

“Dystopia and utopia, however, rather than necessarily antithetical, may be categorically contiguous. If being in a state of desire implies that that desire is not yet satisfied, the attainment of utopia (absolute contentment) must invariably require the abolition of human longing (for that which might be but which is not yet achieved). And the elimination of the ability to desire, even if not actually dystopian, may in fact be either equidistant from both dystopia and utopia, or else impossible, because, as Barnes’s hero discovers [in The Dream], in a place where your wishes are automatically fulfilled, the only impossible desire turns out to be the wish to become someone who never gets tired of eternity, which in

turn may only be possible by means of ceasing to exist (obliteration): ‘you can’t become someone else without stopping being who you are’ (Barnes, 1990: 308); and stopping being who you are is dying, by any other name.”

-MARIA LISBOA, The End of the World: Apocalypse and Its Aftermath in Western Culture (2 November, 2019)

—

FIRE AND ICE

Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I’ve tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.

-ROBERT FROST (Saturday 2 November, 2019)

—

“Yes I do love it! The sea is everything. It covers seven-tenths of the terrestrial globe. Its breath is healthy and pure. It is a spacious wilderness where man is never alone, for he can feel life throbbing all around him. The sea is the environment for a prodigious, supernatural existence; it is nothing but movement and love; it is a living infinity, as one of your poets has said. And indeed, sir, nature is present there in its three kingdoms, animal, vegetable, and mineral. The animal kingdom is well represented by the four groups of zoophytes, three classes of articulates, five classes of molluscs, and three classes of vertebrates—mammals, reptiles, and countless legions of fish, which constitute an innumerable order of more than 13,000 species, of which only a tenth live in fresh water. The sea is nature’s vast reserve. It was through the sea that the globe as it were began, and who knows if it will not end in the sea! Perfect peace abides there. The sea does not belong to despots. On its surface immoral rights can still be claimed, men can fight each other, devour each other, and carry out all the earth’s atrocities. But thirty feet below the surface their power ceases, their influence fades, their authority disappears. Ah, sir, live, live in the heart of the sea! Independence is possible only here! Here I recognize no master! Here I am free!”

-JULES VERNE, 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea (Chapter 10, Translation William Butcher), 30/10/2019

—

“I have always had this fear of people, not actually of the people themselves, but of their intrusion.“

-KAFKA (quoted in Aneli Rufus’s Party of One), 30/10/19

—

“Think, dear Sir, of the world that you carry inside you, and call this thinking whatever you want to: a remembering of your own childhood or a yearning toward a future of your own – only be attentive to what is arising within you, and place that above everything you perceive around you. What is happening in your innermost self is worthy of your entire love; somehow you must find a way to work at it, and not lose too much time or too much courage in clarifying your attitude toward people….Only the individual who is solitary is placed under the deepest laws like a Thing, and when he walks out into the rising dawn or looks out into the event-filled evening and when he feels what is happening there, all situations drop from him as if from a dead man, though he stands in the midst of pure life….It is like this everywhere; but that is no cause for anxiety or sadness; if there is nothing you can share with other people, try to be close to Things; they will not abandon you; and the nights are still there, and the winds that move through the trees and across many lands; everything in the world of Things and animals is still filled with happening, which you can take part in; and children are still the way you were as a child, sad and happy in just the same way and if you think of your childhood, you once again live among them, among the solitary children, and the grownups are nothing, and their dignity has no value.

RILKE, Letters to a Young Poet, 30/10/19

Being human is a tricky business.

Therapy can offer us many things, but perhaps its three most valuable offerings are:

1) A person and a process to whom you can speak your Inner Truth, whatever that is.

2) A place where you will always be fully heard and engaged with, without any moral or social agendas driving our discussion (the only focus being a your mental, physical and creative/spiritual well-being).

3) An opportunity to get to know yourself a bit better, and in so doing, learn to cope more skilfully with the Self or Selves you are (or hope to become).

Where To Begin?

I believe there are Five Jumping-Off Points in terms of any therapeutic conversation or encounter we might have. You can read about these in the How I Work section of this site.

Perhaps an overall good place to start is to ask yourself “who” exactly is reading these words?

You, of course, but who or what is this “you”?

Each of us gets through life thanks to a certain kind of temperament, character, or personality style. This is the lens or “Operating System” through which the psyche functions in order to to get its needs met. Freud gave a very simple name to this part of us, calling it “I” or “me” (in German: Das Ich), which in English is usually translated into the Latin word Ego.

How I Might Be Able To Assist You With All of This

I have over a decade’s worth of experience, both in the NHS and privately, helping clients with an extensive range of personal issues ranging from anxiety and depression to relationship problems (including couples therapy and dating issues/frustrations), sexuality and identity, LGBTQ+ issues and gender dysphoria, substance/food/drink dependencies, ADHD, autism and other forms of neurodivergency, trauma, PTSD, work problems, and all the other ways in which we human beings suffer.

Together we can explore what factors might be contributing to your struggles, looking at the deeper roots of these problems as well as focusing on the here-and-now to help you lead a more fulfilling life.

This can help give you a better understanding of yourself, as well as new skills or perspectives in moving ahead through life. For more about how we would do this, please have a look at my How I Work page.

If you’d like to arrange an initial consultation session to talk more, or perhaps connect for a 15-20 minute “vibes” chat on the phone, let’s organise that for us on WhatsApp (07804197605), or via email if you prefer.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Finding the right therapist to work with is a deeply personal and important decision. More than credentials or techniques, it’s about connecting with someone who truly understands you and with whom you feel comfortable. That’s why I am pleased to offer an initial 50-minute Connecting Conversation entirely free of charge.

What is the Connecting Conversation?

The Connecting Conversation is an opportunity for us to meet and see if we feel a resonance that we can build upon in a therapeutic relationship. This session isn’t about diagnoses or quick fixes; it’s about two human beings meeting and exploring the potential of working together and continuing to talk in this way on a weekly basis.

PREPARATION FOR YOUR CONNECTING CONVERSATION

Contact me, and we’ll find a suitable time for our session. This offer is available during my regular working hours until I’m fully booked.I offer appointments for private clients from Monday to Friday, with options available both during the afternoon (1-3pm) and in the evenings (6pm and 7pm), ensuring flexibility to suit your work and life commitments.

A Personalized Reflective Questionnaire:

Using your personality test results and HIP style as a basis, I will then create a reflective questionnaire specifically tailored for you. This exploration is more than an analysis of your character; it’s an invitation to delve into the deepest parts of your heart, soul, and mind.

This questionnaire will be sent to you as a Google Doc so that you can write directly onto it. Treat it as you would a journaling exercise, a way to connect with yourself and pinpoint your own ‘existential burning questions’, those particular areas—sometimes painful or challenging—that you wish to explore in therapy. This method will helps us to move beyond mere surface-level understanding, paving the way for a truly meaningful conversation.

Could you please ensure to complete all of the above and send it to me by midnight, the day before our Connecting Conversation so that I have some time to look through all of this before we meet.

HAVING OUR FIRST CONNECTING CONVERSATION

During our first 50-minute Connecting Conversation, the insights gathered from these assessments will guide our discussion, focusing on your individual needs and potentials.

If you’re open to it, we can also record the session as an MP3 (please let me know your preference in advance, so we can coordinate). This recording will transform our conversation into a tangible marker of your therapeutic journey. It will not only commemorate your starting point but also become a reference to reflect upon. Rest assured, all recordings will be stored securely and erased after our work is done.

Afterwards, there’s no obligation to continue. However, if you feel comfortable with my approach and we agree that it aligns with your needs, we can then plan to commence with regular weekly sessions at your convenience.

This personalised method ensures that our potential ongoing work together is built on a meaningful connection, laying a strong foundation for a unique and substantive dialogue.

Scheduling and Continuity

Please have a look at this page on my website for information regarding my address, fees, payment and cancellation details (for future sessions) as well as options for doing our sessions online.

When scheduling your Connecting Conversation, please carefully consider your chosen time for having it, as this day and time will most likely become our regular weekly appointment slot, should you wish to continue with therapy.

Like many therapists, I work with clients on a weekly basis, emphasising continuity and consistency. This approach aligns with standard professional practice, including typical cancellation charges. Some flexibility may exist, but the preference is for individuals who can adhere to the same day and time on a weekly basis. Please note that the overall duration of therapy isn’t set from the outset; but will rather reflect your needs and how our therapeutic process progresses.

If this current structure isn’t the right fit for you now, keep in mind that you’re always welcome to schedule a Connecting Conversation when it feels right for you and you are able to commit to this kind of therapy schedule.

Why Offer This for Free?

I’m committed to making therapy accessible while balancing the need to sustain my practice. I believe in the importance of compatibility and resonance. This free session allows you to experience my approach and will hopefully also provide some valuable insights for your life, without any financial risk.

Who is This For?

If you’re curious as well as serious about therapy, seeking clarity, or simply want to find the right fit with a therapist, a Connecting Conversation can be the starting point for our potential work together.

My Assurance

This offer to have a Connecting Conversation represents my dedication to invest in our relationship from the very beginning. Your commitment to self-understanding, combined with my desire to assist you, will hopefully create a strong foundation on which to build.

Don’t hesitate to get in touch to schedule a Connecting Conversation or if you have any further questions.

“After the last drops of rain began to fall more slowly from the rooftops and the sky’s blue began to spread over the street’s paving-stones, then the vehicles sang a different song, louder and happier, and windows could be heard opening up to the no longer forgetful sun. From the narrow street at the end of the next block came the loud invitation of the first seller of lottery tickets, and nails being nailed into crates in the shop opposite reverberated in the limpid space. It was an ambiguous holiday, official but not strictly observed. Work and repose coexisted, and I had nothing to do. I’d woken up early, and I took a long time getting ready to exist.

I paced from one side of the room to the other, dreaming out loud incoherent and impossible things – deeds I’d forgotten to do, hopeless ambitions haphazardly realized, fluid and lively conversations which, were they to be, would already have been. And in this reverie without grandeur or calm, in this hopeless and endless dallying, I paced away my free morning, and my words – said out loud in a low voice – multiplied in the echoing cloister of my inglorious isolation. Seen from the outside, my human figure was ridiculous like everything human in its intimacy.

Over the pyjamas of my abandoned sleep I’d put on an old overcoat, habitually employed for these morning vigils. My old slippers were falling apart, especially the left one. And with my hands in the pockets of my posthumous coat, I strolled down the avenue of my small room in broad and decisive steps, playing out in my useless reverie a dream no different from anybody else’s.

Through the open coolness of my only window, thick drops of leftover rain could still be heard falling from the rooftops. It was still somewhat moist and cool from having rained. The sky, however, was triumphantly blue, and the clouds that remained from the defeated or tired rain retreated behind the Castle,* surrendering to the sky its rightful paths. It was an occasion to be happy. But something weighed on me, some inscrutable yearning, an indefinable and perhaps even noble desire. Perhaps it was just taking me a long time to feel alive.

And when I leaned out my high window, looking down at the street I couldn’t see, I suddenly felt like one of those damp rags used for housecleaning that are taken to the window to dry but are forgotten, balled up, on the sill where they slowly leave a stain.”

NOTES:

The Effect of Rain and the Limpid Space

In the realm of psychology, two powerful tools, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and the Enneagram, stand out as beacons for self-awareness and personal growth. The MBTI operates as our “Head Operating System,” focusing on cognitive functions and preferences, while the Enneagram functions as our “Heart Operating Intelligence System,” delving into the core of our being, uncovering our motivations, desires, and fears. Together, these frameworks offer profound insights that aid in understanding ourselves and others on a deeper level, fostering a transformative journey towards self-discovery and individual consciousness.

The Depth of the Enneagram

Unlike the MBTI, which categorises individuals into personality types based on preferences, the Enneagram penetrates the heart of human existence. It takes us beyond the surface of behaviours and traits, diving into the essence of what drives us at our very core. By unveiling our underlying motivations and fears, the Enneagram offers an opportunity for profound self-reflection and growth, encouraging us to embark on a quest for authenticity and wholeness.

The Nine Enneagram Types

At the heart of the Enneagram lies a fascinating array of nine interconnected personality types, each encapsulating a unique perspective on life. These types emanate from distinct desires, fears, and motivations, shaping our thoughts, emotions, and behaviours. From the Perfectionist’s pursuit of integrity to the Enthusiast’s thirst for new experiences, each type illuminates a particular path of self-discovery and transformation.

Key Insights from Each Type

1. Type 1 – The Perfectionist: Driven by a deep desire for moral integrity and perfection, they fear being wrong or inadequate. They often serve as their own harshest critics.
2. Type 2 – The Helper: Motivated by a longing to be loved and needed, they fear rejection and abandonment. They often derive their sense of worth from helping others.
3. Type 3 – The Achiever: Striving for success and recognition, they fear failure and insignificance. They often mould themselves to meet societal expectations.
4. Type 4 – The Individualist: Seeking authenticity and a unique identity, they fear being ordinary or unnoticed. They are drawn to exploring their emotions and inner world.
5. Type 5 – The Investigator: Pursuing knowledge and understanding, they fear being overwhelmed or intruded upon. They often seek solace in introspection and analysis.
6. Type 6 – The Loyalist: Craving security and guidance, they fear uncertainty and betrayal. They often seek assurance from others.
7. Type 7 – The Enthusiast: Yearning for excitement and new experiences, they fear pain and limitation. They often resist negative emotions by seeking distractions.
8. Type 8 – The Challenger: Striving for control and independence, they fear being controlled or vulnerable. They often assert themselves in the face of challenges.
9. Type 9 – The Peacemaker: Longing for inner peace and harmony, they fear conflict and disconnection. They often avoid confrontation and seek to maintain balance.

The Enneagram’s Growth Path

The Enneagram unveils two paths for each type: integration and disintegration. Integration reflects a state of emotional health, where individuals embody positive qualities from other types, fostering personal growth and balance. Conversely, disintegration mirrors a state of emotional distress, where individuals manifest negative traits from other types, leading to regression and inner turmoil.

Embracing Complexity: The Human Psyche

Through the Enneagram, we encounter the intricacies and multifaceted nature of the human psyche. Each individual possesses a unique blend of strengths and vulnerabilities, reflecting the profound beauty of the human experience. Embracing this complexity inspires empathy, compassion, and a deeper connection with ourselves and others.

The integration of the cognitive-focused MBTI and the heart-centred Enneagram offers a holistic approach to self-awareness and personal growth. By delving into the depths of our consciousness, we can unearth our true desires, confront our deepest fears, and navigate a transformative journey towards authenticity and self-actualisation. These frameworks not only provide insight into ourselves but also foster greater understanding and empathy for those around us. As we embrace the profound wisdom of MBTI and the Enneagram, we embark on a voyage of self-discovery, empowerment, and an enriched understanding of the human experience.

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is not merely a personality test; it’s a compass for navigating the intricacies of human consciousness, or as some might call it, our “Head Operating System.” By offering a deep insight into how people perceive, process, and react to information, the MBTI becomes a crucial tool in understanding oneself and others.

The Framework of MBTI

• Extraversion vs. Introversion: This is not about being outgoing or shy but rather where you draw your energy. Extraverts gain energy from interacting with others, while introverts recharge through solitude. Understanding this aspect can help in personal relationships and work-life balance.
• Sensing vs. Intuition: This pair defines how you gather information. Sensing individuals trust tangible, concrete facts and details, whereas intuitive people look for patterns, future possibilities, and underlying meanings. Recognising this preference can improve decision-making and creativity.
• Thinking vs. Feeling: This dichotomy is about decision-making. Thinkers use logic, consistency, and objectivity, while feelers decide based on human values, empathy, and harmony. Balancing these aspects can lead to more nuanced judgments.
• Judging vs. Perceiving: This dimension influences how you approach life and deal with the outer world. Judging types prefer order, planning, and decisiveness, while perceiving types value flexibility, adaptability, and spontaneity. Understanding this can lead to personal growth and effective collaboration.

How MBTI Helps with Personal Issues

1. Career Choices: Understanding one’s MBTI type can pinpoint suitable career paths. An ISTJ might excel in analytical fields like accounting, while an ENFP may find joy in creative occupations such as writing. Career satisfaction often aligns with aligning one’s job with their inherent preferences.
2. Relationships: In relationships, MBTI assists in empathy and communication. An extraverted partner learning to appreciate the introverted partner’s need for quiet time can enhance mutual respect.
3. Mental Health: Mental health professionals can use MBTI to tailor therapy, providing tangible strategies for sensing types and more abstract concepts for intuitive types. Recognising how a person thinks allows therapy to be more personally resonant.
4. Personal Growth: Awareness of one’s type can lead to growth and acceptance. It can be a step towards embracing one’s natural tendencies and learning to mitigate potential weaknesses.

Beyond MBTI: Other Tools

MBTI is a starting point, but exploring other tools like the Enneagram and Mind Types (Apollonian, Dionysian, Odyssean) can enrich the self-understanding journey. These frameworks offer different perspectives and layers of complexity, each uncovering unique aspects of personality and consciousness.

Personality shapes the core of our identity, affecting how we think, feel, and act. In any form of therapy, understanding one’s personality becomes an invaluable resource for both therapist and client, aiding in the identification and treatment of various mental health issues but also sheds light on the complexities of human experience, fostering a deeper sense of self-awareness and personal growth.

By tuning into your individual needs and personality style, I can hopefully design interventions that align precisely with your specific attributes, facilitating not only growth but also long-term mental well-being, self-knowledge, and a deeper understanding of your unconscious processing, which we may not always have direct access to.

Understanding these three simple Mind Types is not just about knowing how hypnotizable you are, although that’s an incredibly useful tool in therapy, especially when combined with hypnotherapy or self-hypnosis in the pursuit of change. It’s also about gaining a deeper insight into how you interact with the world around you. Are you driven by emotion and intuition, like the Dionysian? Or perhaps you lean more towards logic and reason, like the Apollonian. Maybe you find yourself striking a balance between these poles, like the Odyssean. These insights can guide our therapy sessions, helping to tailor strategies that resonate with your natural inclinations.

The emphasis on hypnotizability further distinguishes the HIP (Hypnotic Induction Profile) Mind Types from other personality frameworks. Hypnosis is not mere entertainment; it’s a clinically recognized method for facilitating therapeutic change. Knowing your HIP Mind Type can enhance your ability to engage with hypnotherapy, and therapy in general, potentially making your therapeutic journey more impactful.

[If you’d like to try out a quick, 10 minute, self-assessed experiential assessment of your Mind Type, alongside this more cognitive assessment, you can find that here: Unlocking the Mind: Find Out How Hypnotizable You Are]

MIND TYPES, MYERS-BRIGGS, AND THE ENNEAGRAM: UNRAVELING THE THREADS OF PERSONALITY

To unravel the complexity of personal identity, various frameworks have emerged, each offering unique lenses to perceive and interpret who we are. Three of these are core to our self-understanding: Myers-Briggs (MBTI), the Enneagram, and Mind Types. Each offers unique insights into different facets of our being, contributing to a multifaceted picture of who we are.

Plato’s Symposium, penned around 385 B.C.E., is a timeless philosophical dialogue that explores the multifaceted concept of love, or Eros, through a series of speeches delivered by different characters at a banquet. Situated within this framework, The Ladder of Love speech, attributed to the fictional character Diotima but spoken by Socrates, unveils a sophisticated and nuanced understanding of love that transcends mere physical attraction.

Diotima guides us through a philosophical ascent, from loving individual beauty to a profound appreciation of Beauty itself, an eternal and unchangeable form.

Even 2,500 years after its conception, this allegorical progression resonates with contemporary readers as it encapsulates not only a profound philosophical inquiry but also a universal human experience.

The Ladder of Love serves as a timeless guide to love’s potential to elevate the soul, offering profound insights into relationships, self-improvement, and spiritual growth. It remains a masterful testament to the enduring relevance and wisdom of ancient thought in understanding human love and longing.

Here is the speech in full, followed by some reflection questions to bring it alive with respect to your own relationship(s):

The Ladder of Love

Into these things of love, perhaps even you may be initiated. But I do not know whether you can grasp the rites and revelations for the sake of which these actually exist if you pursue them correctly. Well, I will speak of them and spare no effort; try to follow if you can.

A person who proceeds rightly to love must begin while still young by going to beautiful forms. First, if guided rightly, they must love one single form and beget beautiful discourses; next, recognize that the beauty on any form is akin to that on any other form. Realizing this, they are constituted a lover of all beautiful forms, relaxing this vehemence for one, looking down on it as of small importance.

After this, they must come to believe that beauty in souls is more to be valued than that in the body, so that even if someone’s soul has but a slight bloom, it suffices. They will love and care and seek those discourses that will make the young better, in order to contemplate what is beautiful in practices and laws and to see that it is all akin to itself. They will believe bodily beauty to be a small thing.

After practices, the guide must lead them to various branches of knowledge, to see their beauty too, and, looking now to the beautiful in its multitude, no longer delight like a slave in the beauty of a single thing. Rather, having turned toward the ocean of the beautiful and contemplating it, they will beget many beautiful and imposing discourses and thoughts in ungrudging love of wisdom, until, having grown strong, they behold knowledge of a certain kind of beauty.

The Ascent to Beauty Itself

The one seeking love, educated in these matters and beholding beautiful things rightly, will then, suddenly, see something marvelous, beautiful in nature: it is that for the sake of which all previous labours existed. First, it ever is and neither comes to be nor perishes, nor has growth nor diminution. Again, it is not beautiful in one respect but ugly in another, nor beautiful at one time but not at another. It exists in itself alone, forever, while all other things are beautiful by sharing in that.

But when someone, ascending from things here through the right love, begins to see the Beautiful, they would pretty well touch the end. For this is the right way to proceed in matters of love, to ascend ever upward for the sake of that, the Beautiful. Using the steps of a ladder, from one to two, from beautiful forms to beautiful practices, to beautiful studies, one arrives in the end at the study of the Beautiful itself.

It is there, dear reader, that human life is to be lived: in contemplating the Beautiful itself. If ever you see it, it will not seem to you as gold or raiment or beautiful forms. What then do we suppose it would be like if it were possible to see the Beautiful itself, pure, unmixed, not full of human flesh and colours, but if one could behold the divine Beauty itself, single in nature?

It is there, if anywhere, that a person can look and contemplate that with true vision, and to be with it, and to beget true virtue. In begetting true virtue and nurturing it, one becomes dear to the divine, and if anyone among people is immortal, they are too.

Socrates’ Conclusion

These then are the things that were said, and I am persuaded. Being persuaded, I try to persuade others that one would not easily find a better partner for our human nature than Love. Therefore I say that every person should honour Love, and I praise the power and courage of Love. Consider this speech an encomium to Love, or name it what you please.

REFLECTIONS:

1. Ascending Beyond Surface Beauty:

Stage 1 – Impulsive Mind (Early Childhood)

In this stage, individuals are largely driven by their impulses and desires. Children in this phase are egocentric and struggle to differentiate between their own perspective and those of others.

Stage 2 – Imperial Mind (Adolescence)

This stage often manifests in adolescence, where individuals can take on others’ perspectives but still focus primarily on their own needs and desires. They begin to understand cause and effect and can see others as separate entities but may still act mainly in their own interest.

Stage 3 – Socialized Mind (Adulthood)

In this stage, individuals internalize the values, beliefs, and expectations of their social environment. They rely heavily on external sources for validation and guidance and tend to form relationships based on shared values and norms. The sense of self is strongly linked to group membership and social roles.

Stage 4 – Self-Authoring Mind (Midlife)

Here, individuals begin to form their own ideologies, independent of the expectations of others. They develop the capacity to self-reflect, assess their own values, and recognize contradictions in their beliefs. While relationships remain important, there’s a stronger focus on personal integrity and self-alignment.

Stage 5 – Self-Transforming Mind (Rare in Adulthood)

This final stage represents a fluid and flexible way of understanding the self, others, and the world. Individuals at this stage see the complexity and interconnectedness of systems and are able to hold multiple perspectives simultaneously. They recognize that their own views and systems of meaning are partial and can continuously transform them in response to a changing context.

—

BACH on THIS:

“This model is derived from a concept by the psychologist, Robert Kegan, and he talks about the development of the self as a process that happens in principle by some kind of reverse-engineering of a mind, where you gradually become aware of yourself and thereby build structure that allows you to interact deeper with the world and yourself.

And I found myself using this model not so much as a developmental model. I’m not even sure if it’s a very good developmental model, because I saw my children not progressing exactly like that. And I also suspect that you don’t go through these stages necessarily in succession. And it’s not that you work through one stage, and then you get into the next one. Sometimes you revisit them. Sometimes stuff is happening in parallel, but it’s, I think, a useful framework to look at what’s present and the structure of a person and how they interact with the world and how they relate to themselves. So, it’s more like a philosophical framework that allows you to talk about how minds work.

And at first, when we are born, we don’t have a personal self yet, I think. Instead, we have an attentional self. And this attentional self is initially in the infant task, is building a world model and also an initial model of the self. But mostly, it’s building a game engine in the brain that is tracking sensory data and uses it to explain it. And in some sense, you could compare it to a game engine like “Minecraft” or so, so colors and sounds. People are all not physical objects. They are creation of our mind at a certain level. Of course, screening models that are mathematical that use geometry and that use manipulation of objects, and so on to create scenes in which we can find ourselves and interact with them.

So, “Minecraft”. (Lex chuckles) Yeah, and this personal self is something that is more or less created after the world is finished, after it’s trained into the system, after it has been constructed. And this personal self is an agent that interacts with the outside world. And the outside world is not the world of quantum mechanics, not the physical universe, but it’s the model that has been generated in our own mind. And this is us and we experience ourself interacting with that outside world that is created inside of our own mind. And outside of ourself, there’s feelings and they presented our interface with this outside world. They pose problems to us. These feelings are basically attitudes that our mind is computing that tell us what’s needed in the world, the things that we are drawn to, the things that we are afraid of.

And we are tasked with solving this problem of satisfying the needs, avoiding the aversions, following on our inner commitments, and so on. And also modeling ourselves and building the next stage. So, after we have this personal self in stage two online, many people form a social self. And this social self allows the individual to experience themselves as part of a group. It’s basically this thing that when you are playing in a team for instance, you don’t notice yourself just as a single note that is reaching out into the world, but you’re also looking down, you’re looking down from this entire group and you see how this group is looking at this individual and everybody in the group is in some sense, emulating this group spirit to some degree. And in this state, people are forming their opinions by assimilating them from this group mind, where we see they gain the ability to act a little bit like a hive mind.

But are you also modeling the interaction of how opinion and shapes and forms through the interaction of the individual nodes within the group? Yeah, the way in which people do it in this stage is that they experience what are the opinions of my environment. They experience the relationship that I have to their environment and they resonate with people around them and get more opinions in this through this interaction to the way in which they relate to others. And at stage four, you basically understand that stuff is true and false independently what other people believe. And you have agency over your own beliefs. In that stage, you basically discover epistemology, the rules about determining what’s true and false.

So, you start to learn how to think. Yes. I mean, at some level, you’re always thinking you are constructing things. And I believe that this ability to reason about your mental representation is what we mean by thinking. It’s an intrinsically reflexive process that requires consciousness. Without consciousness, you cannot think. You can generate the content of feelings, and so on, outside of consciousness. It’s very hard to be conscious of how your feelings emerge, at least in the early stages of development. But thoughts is something that you always control.

Sometimes I reflect on the nature of empathy and what it means to be in tune with others. Often, in my own experience, it’s required something of a meta-architecture, an ability to find common ground or a shared understanding. As a self-proclaimed nerd, I’ve noticed that others often find it hard to resonate with me, and I’ve had to discover my own way to interface with those around me.

Growing up, it was a struggle to find people who understood me. It took years, and it was only when I was surrounded by like-minded individuals that I began to feel a connection. Before that, there was a profound sense of loneliness. There were moments, however, when the connection did happen, like a game of chess with a Russian boy, where language did not matter. We understood each other.

I think back to what it means to be different. The process of socializing can sometimes feel like figuring out an API, finding the documentation to understand others and allowing them to interact with you. It’s not always about being okay with being different, but rather about finding connections and belonging.

In my life, I’ve experienced that feeling of being alone, a visceral, undeniable feeling. But it wasn’t permanent. I found my place in the world and discovered that connection with others could be cultivated and nurtured.

The mind is beautiful in its complexity. Sometimes it’s easy to pay attention to the world fully, to others completely. Other times, stress and distractions can overwhelm. There are stages to identity, a realization that values are not terminal but instrumental. Identities can become costumes, expressions of self, or sometimes prisons.

I’ve learned to appreciate costumes, not just as uniforms but as self-expression, like at Burning Man. The way we dress, the way we present ourselves, is a kind of projection of who we are. It’s a way to communicate with others, and yet it’s often bound by societal norms and expectations.

In the digital world, it may be easier to explore different personas and expressions. Virtual reality, social media—they provide platforms to be as unique or as weird as we want. But there’s something about the tangible, the effort it takes to create physical costumes, that connects us more deeply to ourselves and others.

We become what we wear, in a way. Our clothing can be more than just fashion or status; it can be a reflection of how we feel, what we want, who we are. Maybe we should all strive to be more expressive, to allow our external appearances to match our inner selves.

Life is a stage, and we’re all performing, wearing various costumes, playing roles. For me, the journey has been about understanding that, about learning to be real and authentic, even if it means standing out or being alone for a while. It’s about embracing who I am, finding others who understand, and discovering the beautiful complexity of the human mind and connection.

And in the end, I realize that I’m not alone anymore. I’ve found my place, my people, my way of being. It’s taken time, growth, and perhaps a touch of wisdom, but I’ve come to see the world and myself in a new, more connected way. And that, to me, is a journey well worth taking.

Over nearly a century, a vast corpus of psychological research has underscored the salience of mental flexibility for optimal mental health and life satisfaction. This concept is often discussed in connection with the “Dionysian Personality Style,” a term adopted by David Spiegel, an eminent psychiatrist and a professor at Stanford University.

DIONYSUS, APOLLO, AND ODYSSEUS: THREE WAYS OF BEING HUMAN

Spiegel, drawing on the profound philosophical and cultural history of the ancient Greeks, chose to typify the dichotomy of mental flexibility and rigidity using the characters of Dionysus, Apollo, and Odysseus. Each of these Greek deities represents distinct personality types, with Dionysian signifying mental fluidity, and Apollonian and Odyssean representing a more rigid style of thinking.

The Dionysian personality type, as suggested by its name, corresponds with Dionysus, the Greek god of wine, pleasure, and festivity. People who display this personality type are often perceived as spontaneous, impulsive, and emotionally expressive. They revel in the richness of experiences and are open to exploring different perspectives, thus embodying mental flexibility. This quality allows them to adapt to changing situations and make peace with the inherent unpredictability of life. Consequently, they are more likely to achieve higher life satisfaction and mental health stability.

Contrastingly, the Apollonian personality type, associated with Apollo, the god of truth, prophecy, and order, reflects a propensity for orderliness, predictability, and rationality. Individuals with an Apollonian tendency prefer structure, rules, and order in their lives, often leading to a rigid cognitive style. Meanwhile, the Odyssean personality type, tied to Odysseus, the hero of Homer’s Odyssey, known for his wisdom and strategic thinking, exhibits similar rigid traits. These personalities often find it challenging to cope with life’s uncertainties and changes, predisposing them to various mental health issues and struggles with fulfillment.

Although the Apollonian and Odyssean types are not intrinsically problematic, the rigidity they exhibit may limit individuals’ ability to adapt to life’s ups and downs. It is this cognitive rigidity that can hinder emotional well-being, manifesting as inflexibility in thinking patterns, rigid behavior, and difficulty in processing and adapting to new information.

THERAPIES THAT WORK ON MENTAL FLEXIBILITY/RIGIDITY

Hypnotherapy, used alongside third wave mindfulness-based strategies, including Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT), have proven clinically effective in treating a wide range of mental health issues. All of these therapies offer techniques to foster the mental flexibility that characterizes the Dionysian style and, as well as various Enneagram personality types associated with Dionysian functioning.

For instance, ACT used with hypnotherapy or alone, has been effective in treating conditions like depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and even chronic pain. MBCT, blending cognitive therapy techniques with mindfulness strategies, has shown promise in preventing relapse in depression and managing conditions like bipolar disorder and anxiety disorders. DBT has demonstrated effectiveness in treating borderline personality disorder, self-harming behaviours, and eating disorders.

All of these therapies encourages us to embrace our thoughts and feelings rather than fighting or feeling guilty for them. This is often done by integrating acceptance strategies, mindfulness, and commitment to personal values, enabling us work work on and develop our own mental flexibility.

All the therapies mentioned above, including Hypnotherapy, ACT, DBT, and MBCT, have made significant strides in challenging and reshaping rigid cognitive patterns associated with the Apollonian and Odyssean personality types. Despite ACT having the word “Acceptance” in its title, the essence of all these therapies is fundamentally about acceptance – accepting one’s thoughts and feelings, embracing the uncertainties of life, and choosing actions in alignment with one’s values. This process helps individuals engage more fully with their present circumstances and fosters a more adaptable mindset. This approach aligns well with the Dionysian style’s core tenets, which encourage mental fluidity and promote psychological well-being.

Psychological flexibility entails open-mindedness, acceptance of one’s emotional experiences, adaptation to situational demands, and commitment to behaviours that align with one’s values. Hayes argues that this flexibility is essential for mental health, as it allows individuals to adapt to varying situational demands, reconfigure mental resources, shift perspective, and balance competing desires, needs, and life domains.

Furthermore, the core principles of ACT and other therapies, including hypnotherapy modalities – acceptance, cognitive defusion, present moment awareness, self-as-context, values, and committed action – all contribute to promoting this psychological flexibility. By learning to accept and not avoid unpleasant thoughts and feelings, we learn how to better handle our experiences more productively.

Cognitive defusion (especially when done in hypnotherapy) helps in detaching from unhelpful thoughts, reducing their impact and influence. Being aware of the present moment, we can engage fully in what we are doing instead of getting lost in our thoughts about the past or the future. Understanding one’s self-as-context, helps us to maintain a sense of self even amidst changing thoughts, feelings, and roles. And by identifying our personal values, we can endeavour to live lives that are meaningful and satisfying to us. Lastly, committing to action allows us to make significant changes and move in directions that matter to us.

The psychological insights provided by the works of Spiegel, Hayes and others offer powerful strategies for understanding ourselves and those around us. The dichotomy of Dionysian, Apollonian, and Odyssean personality styles presents an insightful perspective on the human mind, illuminating the intricate interplay between our inherent personality traits and life satisfaction.

The Apollonian, Dionysian, and Odyssean personality groupings, as conceptualized by Herbert and David Spiegel, offer a unique perspective on human personality. These categories draw their inspiration from ancient Greek mythology and the philosophical musings of Nietzsche.

Nietzsche used the gods Apollo and Dionysus to represent opposing forces in art and culture – Apollo embodying order, harmony, and rationality, and Dionysus representing chaos, passion/emotions, and the irrational. The Spiegels expanded this dichotomy by introducing the character of Odysseus, an archetype celebrated for resilience and adaptability.

This third personality style, the Odyssean, sits midway between the Apollonian and Dionysian styles, both in terms of personality characteristics and levels of hypnotizability.

THE DIONYSIAN PERSONALITY STYLE

The Dionysian personality style, marked by emotional depth, spontaneity, and a profound connection to the present moment, also aligns with various other psychological concepts and archetypes.

1. Highly Sensitive Person (HSP): Dionysians might exhibit some traits of HSPs, such as high emotional reactivity and sensitivity to environmental stimuli. Their comfort with logical inconsistencies and spontaneous trance states might suggest a heightened awareness of their surroundings and internal experiences, common in HSPs.

2. Flow States: Dionysians might frequently experience flow states due to their ability to focus intensely and their comfort with the present moment. Flow states are characterized by complete absorption in what one is doing, and a sense of losing oneself in the activity, which aligns with the Dionysian’s spontaneous trance states.

3. Maslow’s Self-Actualizers: Dionysians might exhibit traits of self-actualizers, such as spontaneity, comfort with ambiguity, and a focus on the present. However, their entrenched sense of inferiority and role confusion might suggest that they struggle with some aspects of self-actualization, such as self-acceptance and autonomy.

4. Jungian Archetypes: Dionysians might align with the “Explorer” archetype, characterized by a desire for freedom and a love for new experiences. They might also align with the “Magician” archetype, characterized by a desire to transform and a comfort with the mysterious and unknown.

5. ADHD: Some traits of Dionysians, such as their spontaneity, comfort with logical inconsistencies, and tendency to focus on the present, might align with symptoms of ADHD. However, it’s important to note that ADHD is a clinical diagnosis that involves significant impairment, and not all Dionysians would meet this criterion.

6. Empaths: Dionysians might exhibit traits of empaths, such as a deep sense of understanding and sharing the feelings of others. Their trusting attitude and uncritical acceptance of others’ cues might suggest a high level of empathy.

7. Dabrowski’s Overexcitabilities: Dionysians might exhibit psychomotor overexcitability due to their vibrant and liberating nature, and emotional overexcitability due to their high emotional reactivity.

ENNEAGRAM DIONYSIANS

Type 4, “The Individualist”: Type 4 individuals are self-aware, sensitive, and reserved. They are driven by a desire for uniqueness and authenticity, which might align more with Dionysians due to their emotional depth and comfort with logical inconsistencies. They belong to the “Reactive” group (reacting against when wants are frustrated), focusing on authenticity and depth of feelings, and their attention goes towards what is missing or what others have. Their “fixation” (habitual mental pattern) is ENVY and their “passion” (habitual emotional pattern) is MELANCHOLY, which they suppress to maintain their uniqueness. Their childhood wounds can often be traced back to a feeling of being different or misunderstood, or to experiences that taught them that they are only special when they are unique and authentic.

Type 7, “The Enthusiast”: Type 7 individuals are spontaneous, versatile, and acquisitive. They are driven by a desire for satisfaction and contentment, which might align more with Dionysians due to their desire for new experiences and their comfort with logical inconsistencies. They belong to the “Positive Outlook” group, focusing on future possibilities, and their attention goes towards exciting options and experiences. Their “fixation” (habitual mental pattern) is PLANNING and their “passion” (habitual emotional pattern) is GLUTTONY, which they suppress to maintain their freedom. Their childhood wounds can often be traced back to a need for satisfaction and contentment, or to experiences that taught them that they must avoid pain and seek pleasure.

Type 9, “The Peacemaker”: Type 9 individuals are accepting, trusting, and stable. They are driven by a desire for inner and outer peace, which might align more with Apollonians due to their desire for harmony and order. However, their ability to merge with others and their environment, as well as their focus on the present moment, might also suggest a Dionysian tendency. They belong to the “Positive Outlook” group, focusing on peace and comfort, and their attention goes towards others’ agendas and priorities. Their “fixation” (habitual mental pattern of ignoring personal priorities) is INDOLENCE and their “passion” (habitual emotional pattern of avoiding conflict) is LAZINESS, which they often suppress for the sake of maintaining peace. Their childhood wounds can often be traced back to a need for peace and harmony, or to experiences that taught them that their opinions and desires are not important, leading them to merge with others and their environment.

In short: The Dionysian triad of types 4 (Individualist), 7 (Enthusiast), and 9 (Peacemaker) are bound by their emotional orientation. Type 4s, introspective and creative, delve deep into their emotional world, mirroring the Dionysian’s comfort with emotional depth and logical inconsistencies. Type 7s, extroverted and spontaneous, seek new experiences to navigate their emotions, reflecting the Dionysian’s vibrant nature and affinity for new events. Type 9s, in their quest for peace and harmony, often suppress their own needs, echoing the Dionysian’s tendency to affiliate easily with others and suspend critical judgment. Despite their unique emotional processing, all three types are fundamentally connected to the realm of feelings, which is key to the Dionysian functioning. This emotional resonance aligns with the Dionysian’s high hypnotizability, as they are more likely to access and navigate their emotional states, facilitating deeper trance states and intense focus.

MYERS-BRIGGS (MBTI) DIONYSIANS:

1. ENFP (Extraversion, Intuition, Feeling, Perception): Dionysians might also align with the ENFP type. ENFPs are enthusiastic, creative, and sociable free spirits who can always find a reason to smile, similar to the vibrant and liberating nature of Dionysians. They are also spontaneous and highly emotional, aligning with the Dionysian’s spontaneous trance states and emotional intensity.

2. ESFP (Extraversion, Sensing, Feeling, Perception): Dionysians might also align with the ESFP type. ESFPs are outgoing, friendly, and accepting. They love life, people, and material comforts. They enjoy working with others to make things happen and bring common sense and a realistic approach to their work, which aligns with the Dionysian’s vibrant and liberating nature and their tendency to focus on the present.

WHEN DIONYSIAN FUNCTIONING GOES AWRY

The Dionysian personality style, while vibrant and liberating, can potentially be associated with certain mental health struggles. However, it’s crucial to remember that these are potential associations, not definitive diagnoses. The presence of Dionysian traits does not necessarily equate to a mental health disorder, but Dionysians may be more predisposed to grapple with some of the following mental health issues:

1. Anxiety: Dionysians, with their spontaneous nature and tendency to live in the present, may struggle with anxiety, particularly when faced with uncertainty or when their trust in others is betrayed.

2. Depression: The Dionysian’s fixed sense of inferiority and role confusion could potentially lead to feelings of worthlessness or hopelessness, key symptoms of depression.

3. Impulse Control Disorders: Given their spontaneous nature and tendency to be drawn to new experiences, Dionysians might struggle with impulse control disorders, which involve problems with emotional and behavioral self-control.

4. Substance Use Disorders: Dionysians’ vibrant and liberating nature, coupled with their tendency to focus on the present, might make them more susceptible to substance use disorders, which involve the misuse of substances like alcohol and drugs.

5. Dissociative Disorders: Dionysians’ ability to spontaneously slip into trance states and their high hypnotizability might align with certain aspects of dissociative disorders, which involve problems with memory, identity, emotion, perception, behavior, and sense of self.

6. Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD): Some traits of Dionysians, such as their role confusion, fixed sense of inferiority, and uncritical acceptance of cues from others, might align with aspects of BPD, characterized by difficulties with self-image, emotional management, and a pattern of unstable relationships.

7. Histrionic Personality Disorder: The vibrant and liberating nature of Dionysians, along with their tendency to be drawn to new experiences, might align with aspects of histrionic personality disorder, characterized by a pattern of excessive attention-seeking behaviors.

8. Bipolar Disorders: The vibrant, liberating, and spontaneous nature of Dionysians might align with the manic phases of bipolar disorders, involving periods of elevated or irritable mood, increased activity, decreased need for sleep, grandiosity, racing thoughts, and rapid speech.

9. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Some traits of Dionysians, such as their spontaneity, comfort with logical inconsistencies, and tendency to focus on the present, might align with symptoms of ADHD.

10. Dependent Personality Disorder: Dionysians’ naive posture of trust in relation to many, if not all, of the people in their environment, and their tendency to suspend critical judgment, might align with aspects of dependent personality disorder, characterized by a long-standing need for the person to be taken care of and a fear of being abandoned or separated from important individuals in their life.

THE APOLLONIAN PERSONALITY STYLE

The Apollonian personality style, distinguished by its focus on order, consistency, and rationality, also corresponds with various other psychological concepts and archetypes.

1. Highly Rational Individuals: Apollonians might exhibit traits of highly rational individuals, such as a strong focus on logic, consistency, and clarity. They might be less comfortable with ambiguity and more inclined towards structured thinking.

2. Flow States: Apollonians might frequently experience flow states when engaged in activities that require a high level of focus and mental clarity, such as problem-solving or strategic planning.

3. Jungian Archetypes: Apollonians might align with the “Sage” archetype, characterized by a desire for truth and a love for knowledge. They might also align with the “Ruler” archetype, characterized by a desire to control and create order.

4. Highly Sensitive Person (HSP): Some Apollonians might exhibit traits of HSPs, such as sensitivity to environmental stimuli and a deep processing of information, although this may manifest more as intellectual overstimulation rather than emotional.

5. Introverts: Given their tendency for introspection and their comfort with solitude, Apollonians might align with introverted personality types.

ENNEAGRAM APOLLONIANS:

Type 1, “The Perfectionist”: Type 1 individuals are rational, principled, and perfectionistic. They strive for improvement and correctness, which might align more with Apollonians due to their focus on order and consistency. They belong to the “Competency” group (displaying competency when wants are frustrated), focusing on doing things right, and their attention goes towards mistakes and imperfections. Their “fixation” (habitual mental pattern) is RESENTMENT and their “passion” (habitual emotional pattern) is ANGER, which they suppress to maintain a sense of balance and correctness. Their childhood wounds can often be traced back to a need for perfection or a sense of responsibility instilled early on, or to experiences that taught them that they must be flawless to be loved.

Type 5, “The Investigator”: Type 5 individuals are innovative, secretive, and isolated. They are driven by a desire for knowledge and understanding, which might align more with Apollonians due to their focus on knowledge and understanding. They belong to the “Competency” group, focusing on mastery and expertise, and their attention goes towards conserving resources and gathering knowledge. Their “fixation” (habitual mental pattern) is AVARICE and their “passion” (habitual emotional pattern) is STINGINESS, which they suppress to maintain their independence. Their childhood wounds can often be traced back to a need for knowledge and understanding, or to experiences that taught them that the world is intrusive and that they must protect themselves through isolation.

Type 6, “The Loyalist”: Type 6 individuals are committed, security-oriented, and reliable. They are driven by a desire for security and support. Phobic Sixes might align more with Apollonians due to their desire for structure and predictability. They belong to the “Reactive” group, focusing on safety and security, and their attention goes towards potential threats and problems. Their “fixation” (habitual mental pattern) is FEAR and their “passion” (habitual emotional pattern) is ANXIETY, which they suppress to maintain security. Their childhood wounds can often be traced back to a lack of security or stability, or to experiences that taught them that the world is a threatening place and that they must always be on guard.

In short: The Apollonian triad of types 1 (Reformer), 5 (Investigator), and 6 (Loyalist) share a cognitive focus, dealing with fear and perception. Type 1s, rational and principled, strive for perfection, reflecting the Apollonian’s focus on order and consistency. Type 5s, cerebral and perceptive, detach from emotions to concentrate on thoughts, mirroring the Apollonian’s analytical nature and desire for understanding. Type 6s, reliable and hardworking, are driven by a desire for security, echoing the Apollonian’s need for stability and predictability. Despite their distinct cognitive processing, all three types share a focus on thought and perception, which aligns with the Apollonian’s methodical approach to life. This cognitive resonance aligns with the Apollonian’s moderate hypnotizability, as they are more likely to analyze and understand their experiences, facilitating a balanced approach to trance states.

MYERS-BRIGGS (MBTI) APOLLONIANS:

1. INTJ (Introversion, Intuition, Thinking, Judgment): Apollonians might align with the INTJ type, characterized by a strategic, logical, and introspective nature. They are often innovative and independent, aligning with the Apollonian’s focus on rationality and introspection.

2. ISTJ (Introversion, Sensing, Thinking, Judgment): Apollonians might also align with the ISTJ type, characterized by a practical, fact-minded, and reliable nature. They are often responsible and systematic, aligning with the Apollonian’s focus on order and consistency.

WHEN APOLLONIAN FUNCTIONING GOES AWRY

The Apollonian personality style, while rational and orderly, can potentially be associated with certain mental health struggles. However, it’s crucial to remember that these are potential associations, not definitive diagnoses. The presence of Apollonian traits does not necessarily equate to a mental health disorder, but Apollonians may be more predisposed to grapple with some of the following mental health issues:

1. Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD): Apollonians, with their focus on order and consistency, may struggle with OCD, particularly when faced with uncertainty or chaos.

2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD): The Apollonian’s focus on rationality and order could potentially lead to excessive worry about various aspects of life, a key symptom of GAD.

3. Social Anxiety Disorder: Given their introspective nature and potential alignment with introverted personality types, Apollonians might struggle with social anxiety disorder, characterized by a fear of social situations.

4. Depression: The Apollonian’s focus on rationality and consistency, coupled with their introspective nature, might make them more susceptible to depression, particularly if they struggle with feelings of inadequacy or failure.

THE ODYSSEAN PERSONALITY STYLE

The Odyssean personality style, recognized for its resilience, adaptability, and a focus on surmounting obstacles, resonates with various other psychological concepts and archetypes.

1. Resilient Individuals: Odysseans might exhibit traits of highly resilient individuals, such as a strong ability to adapt to change, overcome challenges, and bounce back from adversity.

2. Flow States: Odysseans might frequently experience flow states when engaged in activities that require a high level of adaptability and problem-solving, such as navigating complex situations or overcoming obstacles.

3. Jungian Archetypes: Odysseans might align with the “Hero” archetype, characterized by a desire to prove one’s worth through courageous acts. They might also align with the “Wanderer” archetype, characterized by a desire to find oneself and one’s purpose.

ENNEAGRAM ODYSSEANS

Type 2, “The Helper”: Type 2 individuals are generous, demonstrative, and people-pleasing. They are driven by a desire to be loved and appreciated, which might align more with Dionysians due to their focus on relationships and their tendency to affiliate easily with new events. They belong to the “Positive Outlook” group (maintaining a positive outlook when wants are frustrated), focusing on the positive aspects of situations, and their attention goes towards the needs and desires of others. Their “fixation” (habitual mental pattern) is PRIDE and their “passion” (habitual emotional pattern) is FLATTERY, which they suppress to help others. Their childhood wounds can often be traced back to a feeling of being loved only when they are helping or pleasing others, or to experiences that taught them that their own needs are less important than those of others.

Type 3, “The Achiever”: Type 3 individuals are adaptable, excelling, driven, and image-conscious. They are driven by a desire for success and achievement, which might align more with Odysseans due to their focus on success and achievement. They belong to the “Competency” group, focusing on efficiency and practicality, and their attention goes towards tasks and goals. Their “fixation” (habitual mental pattern) is DECEIT and their “passion” (habitual emotional pattern) is VANITY, which they suppress to maintain their image. Their childhood wounds can often be traced back to a need for achievement and success, or to experiences that taught them that their worth is dependent on their accomplishments.

Type 8, “The Challenger”: Type 8 individuals are self-confident, decisive, and confrontational. They are driven by a desire for control and self-determination, which might align more with Odysseans due to their focus on control and confrontation. They belong to the “Reactive” group, focusing on strength and power, and their attention goes towards injustices and violations. Their “fixation” (habitual mental pattern) is LUST and their “passion” (habitual emotional pattern) is EXCESS, which they suppress to maintain their strength. Their childhood wounds can often be traced back to a need for control and self-determination, or to experiences that taught them that they must protect themselves and others from injustice.

In short: The Odyssean triad of types 2 (Helper), 3 (Achiever), and 8 (Challenger) are characterized by their instinctual energies, often manifesting as a drive for control, autonomy, and self-preservation. Type 2s, caring and generous, often neglect their own needs while helping others, reflecting the Odyssean’s resilient nature and focus on overcoming challenges. Type 3s, self-assured and adaptable, are driven by a fear of worthlessness, mirroring the Odyssean’s determination and adaptability. Type 8s, powerful and self-confident, openly express their anger and instinct, echoing the Odyssean’s assertiveness and desire for control. Despite their differences, these types share a common thread of strong willpower and a desire for control, which aligns with the Odyssean’s dynamic approach to life. This instinctual resonance aligns with the Odyssean’s lower hypnotizability, as they are more likely to assert control over their experiences, limiting their susceptibility to trance states.

MYERS-BRIGGS (MBTI) ODYSSEANS

1. ENTJ (Extraversion, Intuition, Thinking, Judgment): Odysseans might align with the ENTJ type, characterized by a strategic, efficient, and outgoing nature. They are often strong-willed and assertive, aligning with the Odyssean’s focus on overcoming challenges.

2. ESTJ (Extraversion, Sensing, Thinking, Judgment): Odysseans might also align with the ESTJ type, characterized by a practical, fact-minded, and social nature. They are often responsible and systematic, aligning with the Odyssean’s focus on navigating complex situations.

WHEN ODYSSEAN FUNCTIONING GOES AWRY:

The Odyssean personality style, while resilient and adaptable, can potentially be associated with certain mental health struggles. However, it’s crucial to remember that these are potential associations, not definitive diagnoses. The presence of Odyssean traits does not necessarily equate to a mental health disorder, but Odysseans may be more predisposedto grapple with some of the following mental health issues:

1. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): Odysseans, with their focus on overcoming challenges and their resilient nature, may be more susceptible to PTSD, particularly if they have experienced significant trauma or adversity.

2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD): The Odyssean’s focus on navigating complex situations and overcoming obstacles could potentially lead to excessive worry about various aspects of life, a key symptom of GAD.

3. Impulse Control Disorders: Given their adaptable nature and tendency to confront challenges head-on, Odysseans might struggle with impulse control disorders, which involve problems with emotional and behavioral self-control.

4. Substance Use Disorders: Odysseans’ resilient and adaptable nature, coupled with their focus on overcoming challenges, might make them more susceptible to substance use disorders, which involve the misuse of substances like alcohol and drugs.

The Apollonian, Dionysian, and Odyssean personality styles offer a unique lens through which to view human personality and behaviour. They provide a framework for understanding how individuals navigate their world, process their experiences, and interact with others. Moreover, these personality styles shed light on the intricate relationship between personality and hypnotizability. They suggest that our susceptibility to hypnosis is not merely a matter of individual differences, but is deeply intertwined with our fundamental ways of being in the world.

These styles are not rigid categories, but rather fluid and dynamic patterns that can change and evolve over time. They remind us that we are complex beings, capable of embodying a multitude of traits, behaviours, and tendencies.

As we navigate the complexities of life, we may find ourselves oscillating between the order and rationality of Apollo, the passion and spontaneity of Dionysus, and the resilience and adaptability of Odysseus. In this dance of personalities, we find the richness and depth of our human-animal experience.

Friedrich Nietzsche, a philosopher known for his profound and often provocative insights, left an indelible mark on the field of psychology. His exploration of the Apollonian and Dionysian dichotomy, inspired by Greek mythology, offers a unique lens through which we can understand human personality. This article delves into Nietzsche’s exploration of these two types, their origins, and their relevance to modern personality psychology.

Nietzsche’s exploration of the Apollonian and Dionysian dichotomy is primarily found in his work “The Birth of Tragedy,” where he uses these concepts to analyze the nature of Greek tragedy. The Apollonian, named after the Greek god Apollo, represents order, rationality, and harmony. Nietzsche describes this force as “the glorious divine image of Apollo,” who “with his gestures reveals the highest delight of existence” (Nietzsche, 1872). The Dionysian, named after the Greek god Dionysus, embodies chaos, passion, and the irrational. Nietzsche portrays Dionysus as a primal force, stating, “Under the charm of the Dionysian not only is the union between one human animal and another reaffirmed, but nature which has become alienated, hostile, or subjugated, celebrates once more her reconciliation with her lost child: homo sapiens.” (Nietzsche, 1872).

Nietzsche believed that these two forces, though seemingly opposing, are intertwined and necessary for the creation of art, culture, and indeed, the full expression of human nature. He wrote, “It is only as an aesthetic phenomenon that existence and the world are eternally justified” (Nietzsche, 1872). This dichotomy, then, is not a battle between two opposing forces, but rather a dance, a delicate balance that gives rise to the richness of our human experience.

Modern philosophers have further explored this dichotomy. For instance, Camille Paglia, in “Sexual Personae,” applies Nietzsche’s dichotomy to the analysis of art and literature, arguing that the tension between the Apollonian and Dionysian is a driving force in the creation of art. Similarly, psychologist Carl Jung used the dichotomy as a metaphor for the conscious (Apollonian) and unconscious (Dionysian) aspects of the psyche.

In the realm of personality psychology, the Apollonian and Dionysian dichotomy can be seen as a precursor to many modern personality theories. For instance, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) includes a Thinking-Feeling dichotomy, which mirrors Nietzsche’s Apollonian-Dionysian dichotomy. Thinking types, like the Apollonian, value order and rationality, while Feeling types, like the Dionysian, prioritize emotion and harmony.

The Enneagram, another popular personality system, also reflects Nietzsche’s dichotomy. Types One, Five, and Six, for instance, can be seen as Apollonian, with their focus on order, rationality, and security. Conversely, Types Four, Seven, and Nine, with their emphasis on individuality, exploration, and peace, embody the Dionysian spirit.

Building on Nietzsche’s dichotomy, the Spiegels introduced a third personality type, the Odyssean. Named after the Greek hero Odysseus, this type represents resilience, adaptability, and a pragmatic approach to problem-solving. Odysseans are characterized by their ability to navigate challenges and adapt to changing circumstances, much like Odysseus in his epic journey home in Homer’s Odyssey.

In the context of the Enneagram, Types Two, Three, and Eight, with their focus on interpersonal relationships, achievement, and control, might align with the Odyssean personality style. These types are often action-oriented and pragmatic, showing resilience in the face of adversity.

In terms of hypnotizability, the Spiegels found that these personality styles correlated with different levels of hypnotic susceptibility. Dionysian individuals, with their emotional intensity and focus on the present, were found to be highly hypnotizable, able to easily slip into trance states. Apollonian individuals, with their focus on order and rationality, were typically less hypnotizable, often maintaining a high degree of control during hypnosis. Odyssean individuals, with their pragmatic and resilient nature, showed a moderate level of hypnotizability, able to use hypnosis as a tool to navigate challenges and adapt to changing circumstances.

Thus, the Apollonian, Dionysian, and Odyssean personality styles not only provide a unique perspective on human personality but also offer valuable insights into the complex phenomenon of hypnotizability.

Nietzsche’s Apollonian-Dionysian dichotomy also resonates with the Big Five personality traits. The trait of Openness to Experience, with its facets of imagination, emotionality, and adventure, aligns with the Dionysian. In contrast, the trait of Conscientiousness, characterized by orderliness, dutifulness, and discipline, mirrors the Apollonian.

Nietzsche’s exploration of the Apollonian and Dionysian dichotomy provides a rich framework for understanding human personality. His insights, though rooted in the analysis of Greek tragedy, resonate with modern personality theories, underscoring the enduring relevance of his work. As we continue to explore the complexities of human personality, Nietzsche’s dance between the Apollonian and Dionysian serves as a reminder of the intricate balance that defines our human nature.

Here’s a great discussion with Anna Lembke, the author of the excellent book Dopamine Nation giving a really good overview of how addictions work, as well as some suggestions for working with them.

Addiction is a complex issue, involving both physical and psychological components.

One effective way to assess if you’re suffering from addiction is through the model, referred to by Lembke, as as the ‘Four Cs’ of addiction: COMPULSION to use, Loss of CONTROL, Continued use despite CONSEQUENCES, and CRAVINGS.

These four dimensions are considered cornerstones in addiction psychology and can be applied to a wide range of addictive behaviours including substance abuse, gambling, and even behavioural addictions like overeating. Let’s delve deeper into each one:

1. Compulsion to Use

The first ‘C’ stands for ‘Compulsion to use’. This is characterized by an obsessive need to engage in the addictive behavior. It’s the constant thinking about the act and an overwhelming urge to perform it, regardless of the time or place. You may find yourself regularly and often involuntarily thinking about your next opportunity to engage in the activity or substance use. This compulsive behaviour can interfere with daily tasks, relationships, and overall quality of life.

2. Loss of Control

The second ‘C’ is ‘Loss of Control’. This means that once you start the addictive behavior, it becomes challenging to stop. You may consume more than you initially intended or spend more time engaging in the behaviour than you had planned. The hallmark of loss of control is the inability to stop, even when you want to. Your desire to engage in the addictive behavior overpowers your initial intention or your previous decisions to limit or stop.

3. Continued Use Despite Consequences

The third ‘C’, ‘Continued use despite consequences’, is a critical criterion for addiction. This means continuing the addictive behaviour even when it causes harm or has negative consequences in your life. These consequences can include declining physical health, damaged relationships, financial hardship, or even legal trouble. If you find yourself persisting with the behavior regardless of such consequences, it’s a significant sign of addiction.

4. Cravings

The fourth and final ‘C’ stands for ‘Cravings’. These are intense, often irresistible urges to engage in the addictive behaviour. Cravings can manifest physically, such as feeling a strong urge to consume a substance, or psychologically, such as constantly thinking about gambling. It’s crucial to note that cravings can be triggered by various stimuli associated with the addictive behavior and can be incredibly hard to resist, pushing you further into the cycle of addiction.

UNDERSTANDING HOW THE FOUR C’S WORK IN MY OWN LIFE?

Here are three reflective questions for each ‘C’ that can facilitate a deeper understanding of these components with regard to your dependency or addiction, in order for us to start planning ways forward.

See if you can give yourself 20-30 minutes for the next four days, exploring each of these four C’s in turn by answering the questions given below for each category.

1. Compulsion to Use
* What triggers my compulsion to use. Are there ways in which I’ve been successful in other areas of my life in terms of avoid or manage triggers that push me towards doing things that I know I will regret? What strategies did I use there? Could these be applied in some way to my addiction.
* How would my daily routine need to change so as to help me not act upon the compulsion to use?
* What is primary coping mechanism I could like develop to combat the compulsion to use?

2. Loss of Control

* When do I feel the most control over my behaviour, and how can I leverage these moments to combat my addiction?
* What is one small aspect of my addiction that I feel I could regain control over right now?
* How does loss of control impact my self-esteem, and what steps would I need take to help restore this esteem and pride in my self?

3. Continued Use Despite Consequences

* How have the negative consequences of my addiction affected my relationships, career, health, or overall life, and what is one change I can make to reduce this impact?
* Are there any negative consequences that I haven’t fully acknowledged or addressed? How might I confront them?
* What can I do to remind myself of these consequences when I feel the urge to engage in addictive behaviour?

4. Cravings
* How do my cravings manifest physically and emotionally, and what strategies have I developed to deal with other cravings in my life, which could also be used to respond to these symptoms?
* When do I typically experience cravings? How can I proactively prepare for these moments knowing that they are going to come up?
* How can I alter my environment or routine to lessen the occurrence of cravings?

Each of these questions is aimed at prompting deep introspection, increasing self-awareness, and encouraging the creation of an action plan to address our addictions, dependencies, and “bad” habits.

STRATEGIES FOR DEALING WITH THE FOUR C’S

Here are some strategies, many of them mentioned in Lembke’s book for dealing with these Four C’s of addiction. Let’s have a chat about which of these most interest you and you might like to try.

1. Compulsion to Use

• Focusing: Regularly practicing different focusing/mindfulness/becoming-present strategies can help us become more aware of our compulsions and better manage them. A great app for doing this is The Act Companion.
• Swapping “Good” Out For “Bad”: This involves drawing up a list of healthier activities like physical exercise, engaging hobbies, or time with loved ones (ideally, something meaningful and valued by us personally) to do instead of the compulsive activity.
• Using Our Support Networks: Building/seeking relationships with supportive friends, family, and mentors who might understand our journey and be there to check up on us, ideally daily, when we are trying to change our relationship to our substance of choice.
• Establish Regular Routines: Consistent daily routines, especially for those times of the day when we are most compelled to use, can provide structure and reduce the chance of giving into our compulsions.
• Journalling: Documenting our thoughts and feelings can provide insight into the triggers of our compulsive behaviour.

2. Loss of Control

• Setting Manageable Goals: It’s best to start by setting realistic, achievable goals that can help us regain a bit more control of our life, and then building on those.
• Prioritizing Self-Care: Regular exercise, balanced nutrition, and sufficient sleep can help us maintain better control over our addictions, as well as establishing a counterfoil to activities that hurt or harm us.
• Using our Tools: Like S.T.O.P, a very popular and oft-cited tool. Or indeed any other tool that works to create a pause between the urge and the loss of control that might follow on from it.
• Adopting a Growth Mindset: Accepting that mistakes are a part of any change or recovery journey is crucial. Learning from them, rather than being discouraged by them.
• Establish Personal Boundaries: We may need to do this within ourselves (the Inner Adult talking to the Inner Child) as well as with others to avoid situations that may trigger a loss of control.

3. Continued Use Despite Consequences

• Prepare a Pros-Cons List: Listing the advantages and disadvantages of our substance use can help us understand its impact on our life.
• Engage in Reality Testing: This technique involves challenging the thoughts and beliefs that lead us back to continued use despite negative consequences. It’s about separating our thoughts and feelings from the reality of the situation. Sticking with and reinforcing this “reality” as much as we can.
• Establishing Accountability: Finding a trusted individual or group to hold us accountable to our healthy behaviours.
• Educating Ourselves: Learning more about the potential risks and long-term effects of our habit.
• Discovering Positive Activities: Finding and engaging in activities that bring joy and positivity to our lives.

4. Cravings

• Practicing Delaying Gratification: When a craving arises, we can try to wait it out. This is even better if we use a distraction activity, or do some yoga or focusing on breath.
• Engage in Distractions: Using activities that keep our minds engaged and help distract us from cravings.
• Perform Breathing Exercises: Deep breathing exercises can help manage anxiety and reduce the intensity of cravings.
• Practicing Positive Visualization: Envisioning a future where we are free from addiction, focusing on the benefits this will bring can be really helpful.
• Ensuring Adequate Hydration and Nutrition: Regular hydration and balanced meals can help prevent cravings triggered by physical needs (such as the need for the sugar in alcohol when our blood sugar levels drop).

Remember, these are just starting points. Substance use disorders are complex and managing them often requires a personalized approach which further discussion in our sessions will allow us to do.

OTHER KEY POINTS OF THE INTERVIEW: 

1. Addiction and Narrative:
Dr. Lembke emphasizes the role of storytelling and narratives in understanding addiction. Our brains are wired to seek pleasure and avoid pain, and addiction often arises from the pursuit of dopamine-driven rewards.

2. The Role of Dopamine in Addiction:
Dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with pleasure and reward, plays a crucial role in addiction. Modern society, with its instant gratification culture, floods individuals with dopamine-triggering stimuli, increasing the risk of addiction.

3. Risk Factors for Addiction:
Various risk factors contribute to the development of addiction, including genetics, early life experiences, trauma, and social environment. Recognizing these factors can help individuals take preventive measures.

4. Anna’s Addiction to Romance Novels:
In a candid and amusing moment, Dr. Lembke shares her own struggle with addiction to romance novels, demonstrating that addiction can manifest in unexpected ways. This personal anecdote adds a relatable and human touch to the discussion.

5. Pain, Pleasure, and Addiction:
Dr. Lembke delves into the complex relationship between pain, pleasure, and addiction. Addressing the root causes of emotional pain and trauma is essential for overcoming addictive behaviors.

6. How to Tackle Addictions:
To combat addiction, Dr. Lembke recommends building resilience and finding healthier sources of pleasure and fulfillment. Engaging in activities that bring a sense of accomplishment, connecting with others, and developing coping mechanisms are essential strategies.

7. Medical Psychedelics and Addiction:
The conversation touches on the potential of medical psychedelics in treating addiction. While there’s hype surrounding these substances, more research is needed to understand their efficacy fully.

8. Honesty, Shame, and Recovery from Addiction:
Openness and honesty are crucial for those struggling with addiction. Overcoming shame associated with addiction is essential for embarking on the path to recovery and better mental health.

Take-home Points:

– Addiction arises from the pursuit of dopamine-driven rewards, and our modern society is filled with triggers that can lead to addictive behaviors.
– Recognizing risk factors and addressing emotional pain and trauma are crucial for tackling addiction.
– Developing resilience, finding healthy sources of pleasure, and fostering connections with others contribute to better mental health and a fulfilling life.
– Medical psychedelics show promise in addiction treatment, but more research is needed.
– Honesty and openness are vital for working with one’s own addictions.

The STOP technique is an acronym that stands for Stop, Take a breath, Observe, and Proceed mindfully.

It’s a strategy that gives us (hopefully) the ability to interrupt the automatic behaviours associated with substance use urges, providing space for a more beneficial response.

1. Stop: This step encourages a halt in whatever action is currently being taken. It’s an intentional pause that aims to interrupt the momentum towards potentially harmful behaviour.

2. Take a breath: Deep, controlled breathing promotes relaxation and reduces anxiety, slowing down the rush of overwhelming emotions or impulses.

3. Observe: This involves acknowledging thoughts, feelings, and sensations, as well as the environment around. By creating awareness of the present state, we can try and recognize our triggers and responses.

4. Proceed With Care: The final step encourages thoughtful consideration of available options and choosing the response that aligns with what is best for us.

Nothing I know matters more / Than what never happened.

John Burnside, ‘Hearsay’

Tragedies are stories about people not getting what they want, but not all stories about people not getting what they want seem tragic. In comedies people get something of what they want, but in tragedies people often discover that their wanting doesn’t work, and as the story unfolds they get less and less of what they thought they wanted. Indeed, both what they want and how they go about wanting it wreaks havoc and ultimately destroys the so-called tragic hero and, of course, his enemies and accomplices. Whether it is called ambition, the quest for love, or the search for truth, tragedies expose, to put it as simply as possible, what the unhappy ending of wanting something looks like – of wanting to displace a king, of wanting vengeance for one’s father, of wanting a special daughter’s love announced. Tragic heroes are failed pragmatists. Their ends are unrealistic and their means are impractical.

Given that we live in a state of permanent need; are, as the psychoanalyst John Rickman said, ‘instinct-ridden’, always found wanting, what is it that makes desiring tragic, dire rather than amusing, full of dread rather than full of life? Isaiah Berlin, in a famous pronouncement in ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’, offered the liberal position: ‘If, as I believe, the ends of men are many, and not all of them are in principle compatible with each other, then the possibility of conflict – and of tragedy – can never wholly be eliminated from human life, either personal or social.’ We always have competing wants, they are often incompatible, so in making choices essentials are sacrificed. Lives are tragic not merely when people can’t have everything they want but when their wanting mutilates them; when what they want entails an unbearable loss. What can be described as tragic about the Oedipus complex, named after a tragedy, is that the child, in the Freudian account, in desiring one parent turns the other into a rival, and ultimately has to relinquish his need for his parents in order to be a wholeheartedly desiring adult. You have to give up being a child, for sex; and that, of course, may not be all you have to give up. The quest, one might say, is the finding out whether it is worth it (it is a variant of ‘you must lose your life in order to find it’). Because, in Berlin’s terms, our ends are many, and often enough incompatible, devastating losses are sometimes entailed. Shakespeare’s King Lear wants to divide his kingdom into three, but he wants one third, Cordelia’s, to be more ‘opulent’ than the other two; he wants to relinquish his crown but sustain something of his power; he wants his daughters and sons-in-law to collaborate with him in being his accomplices; he wants to live as he wants, in other people’s houses. He loses everything he wants, and everything he needs.

The pragmatist would say that the art of life is in rendering incompatible wants compatible; redescribing them such that they are no longer mutually exclusive (Lear might say to Cordelia, ‘OK, put it in a way that works for you’). The liberal realist would say that this is to misrecognize the nature of human needs. For the pragmatist we make our lives impossible by making up impossible choices. In reality we can have, say, justice and mercy, be children and have adult relationships. The liberal realist would say that, often – and particularly in the hard cases like, should we let ex-Nazis lead pleasurable lives? – mercy and justice are compatible only when they lose definition. Both these positions, we can see, are, whatever else they are, different solutions to the same problem: the problem of frustration. The trials and tribulations of wanting are born of frustration; to choose one thing may involve frustrating ourselves of something else. So a lot depends on whether we can bear frustration and whether we want to. If we were creatures less convinced and convincing about our so-called needs we would suffer in quite different ways. Tragedies begin with a person in an emerging state of frustration, beginning to feel the need of something; and at the beginning, for the protagonists, they are not yet tragedies.

Tragedies begin with a dramatic scene in which an urgent frustration unfolds, seeking first definition and then solution. At the very beginning of a tragedy everyone is a pragmatist; people have answers and believe that solutions probably exist. The first English dictionary, Robert Cawdrey’s A Table Alphabeticall of 1604, has, for the word ‘frustrate’, ‘make voyde, deceive’. ‘Make voyde’, in seventeenth-century usage, also meant ‘to avoid’ (as in Coriolanus: ‘for if/ I had fear’d death, of all the men i’ the world/ I would have ’voided thee’ (IV.5), as well as the more familiar meaning of ‘to get rid of’, ‘to empty out’; and ‘deceive’ in this period meant not only ‘to trick’ but ‘to disappoint’. Avoidance, of course, is a getting rid of, but coupled with the word ‘deceive’, ‘to frustrate’ seems to have more to do with lying and cheating than with simply depriving someone of something they need; more to do with guile and cunning and calculation than with meanness. To frustrate someone in this seventeenth-century meaning is to knowingly mislead them. There is something underhand about it, something illicit.

As it happens Cawdrey was a man, as far as we know, not given to evasive behaviour, but to plain speaking, a man in trouble with the authorities. He suffered what was for him the tyranny of Elizabeth’s established Church (for ‘tyrannize’ he has in his dictionary ‘use crueltie’); he was a Puritan Nonconformist priest who was known for ‘speaking divers words in the pulpit, tending to the depraving of the Book of Common Prayer’, and ‘not conforming himself in the celebration of the divine service and administration of the Sacraments, but refusing to do so’ (The First English Dictionary) (for ‘conform’ Cawdrey has ‘to make like unto, to consent’). We might now think it entirely appropriate that a future lexicographer would be ‘speaking divers words in the pulpit’ before losing his living as a priest. ‘To frustrate’ in Cawdrey’s sense is not straightforwardly to refuse someone something; it is, in that strange phrase, to ‘make voyde’ – literally to make something into nothing, to deceive – literally to cause someone to believe something that is false. It is, one might say, a form of magic, a conjuring trick; something there is not there, something false is true.

In a famous scene in King Lear (IV.6) – probably written a year or two after Cawdrey’s dictionary – in which Edgar is supposedly helping his blind father, Gloucester, to jump over the cliff, we find again these twinned meanings of a now all too familiar word. Unable to deliver himself from torment by suicide, Gloucester invokes the common theme of the play – the loss of props, of cultural forms to contain conflict, the present impossibility of conciliating rival claims; that there are things that can neither be avoided nor banished:

Alack, I have no eyes.

Is wretchedness depriv’d that benefit

To end itself by death? ’Twas yet some comfort,

When misery could beguile the tyrant’s rage,

And frustrate his proud will.

What you do with proud wills, in both senses, is the play’s issue. In the first act Lear, in his tyrant’s rage at Cordelia’s apparent refusal – and one of the questions the play asks is, in what way is Cordelia frustrating her father? – accuses his daughter of deception: ‘Let pride, which she calls plainness, marry her.’ Her pride, he says, will have to be her dowry, and get her a husband. Pride means knowing, intractably, what you want. There are many enraged tyrants in this play, and the play keeps working out what we should do with them, and what it is that makes them tyrannical. Gloucester here adds death to the troop of tyrants, but strangely he looks back almost with nostalgia to a time when suicide was an option – even, perhaps alluding to Cleopatra, a noble option – but acknowledging at the same time that the only thing you can do with tyrants is deceive them: ‘’Twas yet some comfort,/ When misery could beguile the tyrant’s rage,/ And frustrate his proud will.’ The point is reiterated; beguiling the tyrant’s rage means cheating it, as does frustrating his proud will. Someone is seemingly omnipotent and then, as if by magic, they are not. Their power is void (as is Lear’s). It is evidently a paradoxical point that you can cheat the tyrant Death by killing yourself – you win by losing – or by identifying the enemy. Gloucester could deprive Death by dying. In what sense has the tyrant been frustrated?

A tyrant is someone who wants something from us that we don’t want to give. And in this sense Death could be described as a tyrant. So we can say, by way of an initial proposal, that a tyrant can be someone we want to frustrate, or even need to frustrate. Our lives (and, indeed, the best lives of others), as Cordelia shows, might depend upon our being able to do this. And given the nature of tyranny, the omnipotence it aspires to, this is going to require some trickery, some invention, some deception. Or, rather, something that can only feel like deception to the one who is being refused. Cordelia is speaking plainly but to Lear she is speaking with pride; from the tyrant’s point of view, not to be given what one wants is indeed to be deceived. And it is a deception because Lear assumes, rightly or wrongly, that it is within Cordelia’s power to give him what he wants. A tyrant is someone who believes that what he demands is available and can be given (to be entitled is, by definition, not to question the reality of what it is one is entitled to). So, a familiar situation arises: Cordelia is not deceiving Lear, but Lear feels deceived by her. Cordelia is not giving Lear what he wants, but she is not deceiving him (in her view she would be tricking him if she complied, as her sisters do). In Cawdrey’s terms she ‘makes voyde’ his claim, his demand; Lear feels he is being tricked. What is it to frustrate someone? To make void what they want, but not necessarily to deceive them. What is it to be frustrated? To feel deceived because, it is assumed, the person has whatever it is that you want from them (it is in their gift). This assumption is sometimes true and sometimes not; it would seem more hopeful to assume that they are withholding something that they could give you, but if this turns out not to be true then your hopefulness is under suspicion (frustration is optimistic in the sense that it believes that what is wanted is available, so we might talk about frustration as a form of faith). When you feel frustrated you are, like Lear, the authority on what you want. If you weren’t, you wouldn’t be a tyrant and you wouldn’t be in a rage.

If you are the frustrator, like Cordelia – the one who in this instance refuses to be complicit with the demand being made, the demand for exorbitant love – you are a different kind of authority; you are the authority on what you are realistically able to give (‘I love your Majesty/ According to my bond; no more nor less’ (I.1). Or, rather, perhaps, the authority on what you want to give. Giving Lear the other thing that Goneril and Regan give him would, we might say, turn her into something she doesn’t want to be; would be a way of making a world for herself that she couldn’t bear to live in. And put in this way, of course, the frustrator sounds more morally interesting, in a more complex predicament, than the one who is frustrated. Lear is an old man having a tantrum and Cordelia, who will not abide by her father’s injunction – ‘Mend your speech a little,/ Lest you may mar your Fortunes’ (I.1) – loses her family in speaking her truth.

And yet there is something symmetrical about Lear and Cordelia; they both, at the beginning of the play, know exactly what they want. And I don’t think we solve this problem by saying, in one way or another, that what Cordelia wants is better than what Lear wants. It certainly isn’t worse, but it is no less intractable (John Berryman, in Berryman’s Shakespeare, writes of ‘the exquisite matching of a slight excess in Cordelia (an excess of contempt for her sister’s extravagant replies over her filial emotion) against a decided prematurity in Lear’s ungovernable rage against her’. Lear, we might say, even if it is on the basis of it-takes-one-to-know-one, is not completely wrong in implying that there is something tyrannical – though not enraged – about Cordelia’s position. Neither, in the opening scene, can change the other’s mind. ‘The cause of tragedy,’ Stanley Cavell writes in his great essay on King Lear, ‘The Avoidance of Love’, ‘is that we would rather murder the world than permit it to expose us to change’ (Disowning Knowledge). We would rather destroy everything than let other people change us, so strong is our memory of how changed we were at the very beginning of our lives by certain other people; people who could change our misery into bliss, as if by magic, and which we were unable to do for ourselves (all we could do was signal our distress and hope someone got the point). In the first scene of the first act it is Lear, not Cordelia, who would rather murder the world than expose himself to change. Cavell intimates that we are always looking for an alternative to changing, to being, as he puts it, exposed to change. The frustration scene – which goes back a long way – is the scene of transformation. Everything depends on what we would rather do than change.

To frustrate, then, is to, in one way or another, make void a demand made on oneself; to avoid it or to make it as nothing; and it is to deceive the other person either if you have what they want and won’t give it, or if you can create the illusion that you have what they want but are merely refusing to give it. And to be or feel frustrated is to be maddened by having one’s demand negated or avoided or tantalized. In this picture it is as though a contract has been broken; as if one person always has what the other person demands of them and the only question is how to get it (God, of course, can be this other person, or the state). In the optimistic version of this story the only question is a pragmatic one: I want to get from A to B, I just have to find out how to get there, and how to get the wherewithal to get there. I want my favourite daughter’s love for me declared, so I ask her to speak. This assumes, of course, a preconstituted subject, a person without an unconscious; a person who, because he knows what he wants and needs, knows what he is doing, and so only has to work out how to get his satisfaction; and, if need be, as the Lear story shows, how to bear not getting what is supposedly wanted (it is frustration that makes us inventive, resourceful, at our best and at our worst). Clearly the demand for love, the demand that love be articulated, is something of a special case. As is what can be asked for between parents and children, who are continually having to work out what is possible between them. So the issue of entitlement between parents and children, or between lovers, or between friends, can never be straightforward. The entitled are always too knowing.

Knowing too exactly what we want is what we do when we know what we want, or when we don’t know what we want (are, so to speak, unconscious of our wanting, and made anxious by our lack of direction), or when we are so fearful of what we want we displace it on to a known object in a state of militant certainty (if we say that at the beginning of the play Lear is in a terrified state of not knowing what he wants at this stage of his life, or is testing what kingship entails, his reaction to Cordelia’s response can be seen in a different light). Knowing what one wants is a way of not exposing oneself to change (or of taking change too much into one’s own hands, subjecting it to one’s will); and, by the same token, taking up Cavell’s point, is prone to make us murderous. So it is tempting to say that we can be at our most self-deceiving in states of frustration; as though frustration were an unbearable form of self-doubt, a state in which we can so little tolerate not knowing what we want, not knowing whether it is available, and not having it that we fabricate certainties to fill the void (we fill in the gaps with states of conviction). The frustration is itself a temptation scene, one in which we must invent something to be tempted by. Satisfaction is no more the solution to frustration than certainty is the solution to scepticism. Indeed, it may be misleading to think of frustration as a question; or it may be a question with no answer; or with only approximate answers, like Lear’s ‘Tell me, my daughters …/ Which of you shall we say doth love us most?’ (I.1), which reminds us that it is all in the saying, and that the saying is as close as we can get. The play asks us to wonder, in other words, about what we do with our frustration and what our frustration does with us; it being one of the starker facts about the experience of frustration that it raises the question of agency, of whether, quite literally, frustration is something we can do something with, or can ever avoid doing something with. Or whether what we think of as our agency – or our will, or our capacity to make choices – is something invented, called up, by this primal experience of frustration (the idea of the self as a self-cure for our first helplessness in the face of our need, like bravado in a storm). As the British psychoanalyst Wilfred Bion writes in Second Thoughts, as we shall see, everything ‘depends on whether the decision is to evade frustration or to modify it’.

Frustration is always, whatever else it is, a temptation scene; something we are tempted to get rid of, something we crave false solutions to, something that lures us into the more radical self-deceptions. So there are two propositions I want to consider: first, that the frustrator is always, whatever else she is doing, wanting to change the person she is frustrating (she may drive the person crazy, or away, or be getting someone to face the facts, but a change is being sought; the malign and the benign frustrations are transformative). And second, following on from this, it is extremely difficult to feel one’s frustration, to locate, however approximately, what it might be that one is frustrated by (or about). And there is an obvious, indeed logical, reason why this might matter. Without frustration there can be no satisfaction. Frustration that is unrecognized, unrepresented, cannot be met or even acknowledged; addiction is always an addiction to frustration (addiction is unformulated frustration, frustration too simply met). What, then, is the relationship, the link, the bond, the affinity between frustration and satisfaction? How do we find ourselves fitting them together or joining them up? There may, for example, be something about frustration that makes it resistant to representation, as though our frustrations are the last thing on earth we want to know about. We might prefer spurious frustrations to real satisfactions, or avoid or attack the link between frustration and satisfaction. Frustration, to put it simply, is something we cannot be indifferent to even if indifference can be one of our attempted solutions to it (we pose and boast in the face of our frustrations). The fact that there are frustrations seems to imply, of course, that there are satisfactions, real or otherwise. The fact of frustration has, that is to say, something reassuring about it. It suggests a future.

But it would be sensible to believe that if we have misconstrued the whole notion of frustration – or if our frustrations are difficult to construe – we might have misunderstood the nature of satisfaction: had the meaning but missed the experience. In our frustration we muddle through, or what we do with frustration is make a muddle of it (as if, when it comes to frustration, clarities are available, but not for us). There is, though, one ineluctable fact, one experience that is integral to our development, something that is structural to human relations right from their very beginning; and that is, that if someone can satisfy you they can frustrate you. Only someone who gives you satisfaction can give you frustration. This, one can say, is something we have all experienced, and go on experiencing. You know someone matters to you if they can frustrate you. It was because Lear, as he says so poignantly, ‘loved her most’ (I.1) that Cordelia most distressed him; and by the end of the play is his most fully realized loss (‘Nothing really happens to him,’ Barbara Everett writes of Lear in Young Hamlet, ‘except that he learns that Cordelia actually exists’). It is the satisfaction that leads to frustration which links us to Cawdrey’s useful early definition. If the mother, at the start, can make the child feel alive by satisfying his wants, she can, by the same token, make him feel void by her absence; and if the mother is able to make the child feel so good she must surely be deceiving him when she fails to do this. She must be refusing, she must be withholding. Which of them is the tyrant, the mother who doesn’t deliver, or the frustrated child? What are the preconditions for tyranny? How does it become such a handed-down misery? Does the proud will frustrate, or is it the product of frustration, pride being a state of mind, a way of being organized as a self-cure for certain kinds of frustration? It is to this first deception and making void that we need to turn, with the tyrant’s rage and the frustrating of a proud will in mind as one picture of what might be at stake.

The first scene of King Lear can’t help but make us wonder what the demand for love is a demand for. Lear is asking Cordelia to articulate her love, and it is a kind of deal, both with her suitors and with her father. If she says the right thing she will get a better dowry than her all too willing sisters. ‘What can you say to draw/ A third more opulent than your sisters? Speak.’ Cordelia’s famous nothings comprise an unwillingness and an inability; there is nothing she wants to say to draw a more opulent third – which would no longer be a third – and nothing she is able to say to such a request. In this drama of excessive demand – excessive from Cordelia’s point of view – Lear assumes he knows what she wants, a more opulent dowry than her sisters and all that that entails, and assumes he knows what he wants, her wholehearted cooperation. Her nothings make his demand void, which precipitates his rage and banishment rather than, say, some reconsideration of their respective needs, which in Cavell’s terms would be exposure to the possibility of change. Lear’s image suggests that Cordelia has a well of desired words that she might draw from for his and therefore her satisfaction. ‘The doomed man,’ Freud says of Lear in ‘The Theme of the Three Caskets’ (1916), ‘is not willing to renounce the love of women; he insists on hearing how much he is loved.’ It is not clear that Lear is contemplating renouncing the love of women rather than, say, enacting something of the symbolic role of king and father; though it is clear why Freud would want to read it this way because he is preoccupied by what modern individuals are doing with and about the love of women. And there is a difference between renouncing the love of women and insisting on hearing how much one is loved. Freud implies in his account that because Lear is approaching his own death, which he in some way experiences as an enforced renunciation of women’s love, he insists on hearing about it. Lear can’t live without the love of women, and he can’t live with the way in which he demands love from them. The demand for love is always a doubt about love; and all doubt begins as a doubt about love.

All love stories are frustration stories. As are all stories about parents and children, which are also love stories, in Freud’s view, the formative love stories. To fall in love is to be reminded of a frustration that you didn’t know you had (of one’s formative frustrations, and of one’s attempted self-cures for them); you wanted someone, you felt deprived of something, and then it seems to be there. And what is renewed in that experience is an intensity of frustration, and an intensity of satisfaction. It is as if, oddly, you were waiting for someone but you didn’t know who they were until they arrived. Whether or not you were aware that there was something missing in your life, you will be when you meet the person you want. What psychoanalysis will add to this love story is that the person you fall in love with really is the man or woman of your dreams; that you have dreamed them up before you met them; not out of nothing – nothing comes of nothing – but out of prior experience, both real and wished for. You recognize them with such certainty because you already, in a certain sense, know them; and because you have been quite literally expecting them, you feel as though you have known them for ever, and yet, at the same time, they are quite foreign to you. They are familiar foreign bodies. But one thing is very noticeable in this basic story; that however much you have been wanting and hoping and dreaming of meeting the person of your dreams, it is only when you meet them that you will start missing them. It seems that the presence of an object is required to make its absence felt (or to make the absence of something felt). A kind of longing may have preceded their arrival, but you have to meet in order to feel the full force of your frustration in their absence.

You might say, before you met the man or woman of your dreams – or indeed any of the passions of your life – you felt a kind of free-floating diffuse frustration; and what you did by finding the miraculous object was locate the source of your frustration. Falling in love, finding your passion, are attempts to locate, to picture, to represent what you unconsciously feel frustrated about, and by. In this sense we are always trying to find, to get a sense of, what is missing, what we need, what, in Lacan’s terminology, we lack. The sources we seek are the sources of our frustration. It would be logical, but only logical, to think – instrumentally, pragmatically, sensibly – that the point of finding out what is missing is to recover it; that at least the first stage of making up for a deprivation is to discover just what it is we are deprived of. That we need to know, or to sense, what we have lost in order to refind it. The finding of an object, Freud says in a famous pronouncement about the erotic life, is always a refinding of an object. And yet Freud also questions – in a way that was taken up by later psychoanalysts – the reality of these lost and found objects. He intimates – and states outright – that we may never have had this object in the first place, and that we can’t recover it. That the object, the person we are looking for, and can never refind because it never existed, was the wished-for one. We never, in other words, recover from our first false solution to feeling frustrated – the inventing of an ideal object of desire with whom we will never feel the frustration we fear. The ideal person in our minds becomes a refuge from realer exchanges with realer people.

After Freud, psychoanalysts have tended to say, either we did have something – call it the experience of sufficient mothering, the rivalrous pleasures of the Oedipus complex, of competing for the affection of both parents – and we can recover something of that something; and indeed that is what our lives are, a project of recovery and restitution; or we have to ironize our always wanting to get something back that we never had and that never existed anyway (Lacan, in the hyperbolic version of this, said love is giving something you haven’t got to someone who doesn’t exist). What I think we should be interested in in these accounts is not what they say about love, but what they say about frustration, love’s more recondite twin, love’s secret sharer. Perhaps what these psychoanalytic stories suggest, at its most minimal, is that there are (at least) four kinds of frustration: the frustration of being deprived of something that has never existed; the frustration of being deprived of something one has never had (whether or not it exists); the frustration of being deprived of something one has had; and, finally, the frustration of being deprived of something one once had, but can’t have again. Clearly these forms of frustration flourish in the same hedgerow, and can’t always be told apart. But classified, put as starkly, as schematically as this, one thing quickly becomes self-evident: that these are different experiences with different consequences. They bring with them different possibilities, they inspire different futures, they call up different defences, they generate different kinds of unease. And they are applicable to groups, to societies, as well as to individuals. They are also, of course, all contentious. Lear could be said to be suffering from all of them.

Indeed, in terms of the play, or tragedies in general, it may be useful to classify the frustrations as those that turn to revenge – ‘to murder the world’, as Cavell puts it – and those that do not. Lear is vengeful, though that is not all he is. Cordelia is not; she delivers, Michael Long writes in The Unnatural Scene, ‘the Desdemona-like speech of resistance which stirs up vengeful repugnances in [Lear]’. There is the frustration that is turned into revenge, for which revenge seems like some kind of solution, and the frustration that is turned to a different kind of account. And this is a story Freud wants to tell; about how the individual’s fate is bound up with what he can make out of frustration. In Freud’s ‘Formulations on the Two Principles of Psychic Functioning’ (1911) he reiterates and elaborates on how ‘the state of equilibrium in the psyche was originally disrupted by the urgent demands of inner needs’. It is a picture in which the psyche is taken to be in a state of equilibrium, a state of relative balance, until it is disturbed by desire; it is an image if not of violation – what the French psychoanalyst Laplanche famously called the ‘attack of the drives on the ego’ – then of the creature unsettled by her wanting. What Freud calls ‘the urgent demands of inner needs’ means what is called up by a felt sense of frustration, of something needed: ‘At this stage,’ Freud continues, referring to both the stirrings of desire and, possibly, the baby’s early experiences of need,

whatever was thought of (wished for) was simply hallucinated, as still happens every night with our dream-thoughts. It was due only to the failure of the anticipated satisfaction, the disillusionment, as it were, that this attempt at satisfaction by means of hallucination was abandoned. Instead, the psychic apparatus had to resolve to form an idea of the real circumstances in the outside world and to endeavour actually to change them. With this, a new principle of psychic activity was initiated; now ideas were formed no longer of what was pleasant, but of what was real, even if this happened to be unpleasant. This inception of the reality principle proved to be a momentous step.

Freud is describing a simple process: you are hungry, you fantasize a delicious meal, this fantasy doesn’t satisfy you, doesn’t nourish you or fill you up, and you start working out how in the world you can have this meal that you imagine. You begin by hallucinating, that is, fantasizing, and you end up trying to get the wishedfor meal in the real world, which will at best be only an approximation of the one you wanted, but has the advantage of being one you can actually eat. It is the failure of the anticipated satisfaction, its non-arrival once fantasized, that is crucial; it is disillusionment that leads the desiring individual to reality. His first recourse, faced with his frustration, is to attempt to satisfy himself, in fantasy, with a perfect, non-frustrating figure; when this fails his only recourse is to reality. The failure of an initial wished-for satisfaction leads to the possibility of a more realistic satisfaction. Once satisfaction by means of fantasy breaks down, then, Freud says, the individual has ‘to form an idea of the real circumstances in the outside world and to endeavour actually to change them’.

There is a world of difference between erotic and romantic daydream and actually getting together with someone; getting together is a lot more work, and is never exactly what one was hoping for. So there are three consecutive frustrations: the frustration of need, the frustration of fantasized satisfaction not working, and the frustration of satisfaction in the real world being at odds with the wished-for, fantasized satisfaction. Three frustrations, three disturbances, and two disillusionments. It is, what has been called in a different context, a cumulative trauma; the cumulative trauma of desire. And this is when it works.

It is what happens when it doesn’t work that prompted Wilfred Bion’s theory of thinking; thinking being, in his view, the only way of, as it were, productively working out the inevitable experience of frustration. ‘The model I propose,’ he writes in Second Thoughts,

is that of an infant whose expectation of a breast is mated with a realization of no breast available for satisfaction [the infant is hungry and no feed is there]. This mating is experienced as a no-breast, or ‘absent’ breast inside. The next step depends upon this infant’s capacity for frustration: in particular it depends on whether the decision is to evade frustration or to modify it. If the capacity for toleration of frustration is sufficient the ‘no-breast’ inside becomes a thought and an apparatus for thinking it develops. This initiates the state, described by Freud in his ‘Two Principles of Psychic Functioning’, in which dominance by the reality principle is synchronous with the development of an ability to think and so to bridge the gulf of frustration between the moment when a want is felt and the moment when action appropriate to satisfying the want culminates in its satisfaction. A capacity for tolerating frustration thus enables the psyche to develop thought as a means by which the frustration that is tolerated is itself made more tolerable.

Thought is what makes frustration bearable, and frustration makes thought possible. Thinking modifies frustration, rather than evading it, by being a means by which we can go from feeling frustrated to figuring out what to do about it, and doing it; what Freud called ‘trial action in thought’ – and what we might call imagination – leading to real action in reality. The ability to think, Bion says, will ‘bridge the gulf of frustration between the moment when a want is felt and the moment when action appropriate to satisfying the want culminates in its satisfaction’. It is, we should note, a gulf between wanting and actually doing something about it; thinking is the link, the bridge, and not an end in itself, as it is when it becomes a bolt-hole of daydream. And the choice, we should also notice, is, in Bion’s language, between evading frustration and modifying it. If thinking is the way to modify it, then attacking one’s capacity to think would be an evasion; failures of imagination would be the unwillingness to bear with frustration. And Bion is very interested in the ways in which parts of our mind can attack other parts, sabotaging the satisfactions we seek by preventing us finding out what they might be. But what is at stake in these problems and solutions is contact with reality. And reality matters because it is the only thing that can satisfy us. We are tempted, initially, to be self-satisfying creatures, to live in a fantasy world, to live in our minds, but the only satisfactions available are the satisfactions of reality, which are themselves frustrating; but only in the sense that they are disparate from, not in accord with, our wished-for satisfactions (the most satisfying pleasures are the surprising ones, the ones that can’t be engineered). In this picture we depend on other people for our satisfactions. But the quest for satisfaction begins and ends with a frustration; it is prompted by frustration, by the dawning of need, and it ends with the frustration of never getting exactly what one wanted. How could we ever be anything other than permanently enraged?

Perhaps we are permanently enraged, taking revenge on ourselves for not being sufficient for ourselves, and taking revenge on others for never giving us quite what we want. And yet for Bion it is the evading of frustration that is catastrophic. Evasion of frustration, he continues, ‘involves the assumption of omniscience as a substitute for learning from experience by aid of thoughts and thinking’. If you can’t bear frustration, can’t bear the dependence on and involvement of others that satisfaction entails, you have to precipitate yourself into a state of already having and knowing everything (the theological form it takes is, does God need His creation, and if so how can He be a god if He is in need?). The self-cure for frustration is omniscience, the delusion of omniscience (there must be a figure somewhere who is exempt from frustration, and this is God; we need to be able to imagine someone who doesn’t have to feel frustration). Learning from experience means finding ways of making your need compatible with living in the world. Bion thinks we do this by thinking our needs through, observing what the world is like, and trying them out. Finding your place in the world means finding or making a place where your needs work for you.

For Freud and Bion satisfaction takes thought; we have to digest our frustration before we can digest our food. And the stories they have to tell us are about the struggle for satisfaction, that it doesn’t come naturally to us. Indeed, even if we are lucky enough to have had good-enough mothers, good-enough parents, who have helped us contain our frustration and enabled us to think, we are precipitated in this developmental story into the Oedipal world of forbidden desire; the frustrations of the law – our being faced, eventually, with forbidden desires after we have survived the unforbidden ones – follow on from the frustrations inherent in the psychic apparatus’s registering and processing of desire. How does anybody ever get any pleasure? Does anybody ever get any pleasure? And if they do, is it worth it? Psychoanalysis tells us that we can understand satisfaction only by understanding frustration, and that we are prone to find frustration unbearable. In this picture frustration may be the thing that we are least able to let ourselves feel; and by not being able to feel it, to think it, or not being able to feel it or think it enough, we obscure our satisfactions. To be a little more rigorous-sounding, we could say that our satisfactions are inaccurate, or not as accurate as they might be; or not as satisfying as they might be. Not realistic enough. After all, what pleasures could the omniscient be seeking? To take Bion seriously, if we can’t think our frustrations – figure them out, think them through, phrase them – we can’t seek our satisfactions. We will have, as they say, no idea what they are.

Neither Freud nor Bion doubt that there are satisfactions to be had; what they do doubt, paradoxically, is our capacity, perhaps our desire, to know what they might be and to try to find them. We should remember Cawdrey’s 1604 dictionary definition of ‘frustrate’, to ‘make voyde, deceive’. We frustrate ourselves by what we do to our frustration; we use our frustration to deceive ourselves. We are, at least for Freud and Bion, frustrated of frustration; we empty it out, we evade it. We even avoid it by turning it into a pleasure, or fob ourselves off with pleasures that are knowingly unsatisfying; there is, Freud tells us, a wish to frustrate ourselves that is as strong as any wish we have. But if frustration becomes our pleasure we are further than ever from satisfaction. Our frustration would seem to be our commonest experience; and yet Freud and Bion show us both how and why there is nothing more opaque about ourselves than our frustrations. That if it is our first nature to need, it is our second nature to obscure our frustration; that we don’t want to really think or speak because we don’t want to know the nature of, know the experience of, our fundamental frustrations. We prefer our satisfactions without their requisite frustrations. But if it is frustration we hate, it must be satisfaction that we hate even more. In this sense it is not desire that is the problem but the frustration it discloses. You can’t have a desire without an inspiring sense of lack. What we do to our frustration to make it bearable – evade it, void it, misrecognize it, displace it, hide it, project it, deny it, idealize it, and so on – takes the sting out of its tail.

We need to bear with, to know about, our frustrations not simply to secure our satisfactions but to sustain our sense of reality. In the psychoanalytic story, if we don’t feel frustration we don’t need reality; if we don’t feel frustration we don’t discover whether we have the wherewithal to deal with reality. People become real to us by frustrating us; if they don’t frustrate us they are merely figures of fantasy. The story says something like: if other people frustrate us the right amount they become real to us, that is, people with whom we can exchange something; if they frustrate us too much they become too real, that is, persecutory, people we have to do harm to; if they frustrate us too little they become idealized, imaginary characters, the people of our wishes; if they frustrate us too much they become demonized, the people of our nightmares. And these, we might say, are two ways of murdering the world: making it impotent, or making it unreal. If this was quantifiable we would say that the good life proposed by psychoanalysis is one in which there is just the right amount of frustration. It is, however, rather like Lear’s kingdom, not quantifiable. But it seems as though it is all the wrong kinds of frustration that make our lives what they are; that so much depends on what each of us makes of the too much and the too little we get. As Lear says, ‘The art of our necessities is strange’ (III.2). There are tragic solutions to frustration.

For ‘satisfaction’ Cawdrey has ‘a making amends for wrongs, or displeasures’; it is something, that is to say, to do with justice. If to frustrate was to deceive, to invalidate, to satisfy is to repair a misdemeanour. In a replicate scene, at the beginning of Lear, in which the love between parents and children is in question – ‘Lear’s shadow is in Gloster,’ Yeats wrote in his essay ‘The Emotion of Multitude’, ‘who also has ungrateful children’ – Edmund tries to prove his brother Edgar’s treachery to their father, Gloucester; to prove it in the guise of attempting to disprove it. Edmund suggests to Gloucester that he will ‘place you where you shall hear us confer of this, and by an auricular assurance have your satisfaction’ (I.2). We can hear ‘oracular’ in ‘auricular’, and Kenneth Muir in his Arden edition glosses the word to give us its religious connotation: ‘Shakespeare,’ he writes, ‘would know the expression “auricular confession”.’ There is a violation – possibly a desacralizing – of privacy in this treachery; the satisfaction Gloucester will get will not make amends for his suspicion. The satisfaction accruing from the scene will be neither just nor true; nor will it put Gloucester in contact with reality. Satisfaction, here, is one of the forms that frustration takes. One of the ways we frustrate ourselves is through our self-deceiving satisfactions. Gloucester will be frustrated by Edmund’s procured satisfaction. One of the ironies, if that is the right word, promoted by Freud and Bion is that many of our satisfactions are forms of frustration. That we are radically inadequate pleasure-seekers because we are unable to countenance our frustration. We are prone to auricular assurances; we fob ourselves off; we are satisfied by privation; we fail to make amends for our frustration. We avoid making better pictures of the exchanges that we seek. True satisfactions, real satisfactions, satisfying satisfactions – it is difficult to know what the phrase is – should be the key to our frustrations, the clue from which can unravel the nature of the felt deprivation.

Even if, as the psychoanalytic story suggests, all satisfaction is approximate satisfaction – and that is the point and not the problem – frustrations need to be acknowledged. And yet what characterizes what I am calling tragic solutions to frustration is that, almost by definition, they are ineluctable; as if what these darkening tragedies show us is that some frustrations have only tragic solutions; that there are frustrations – or certain people when faced with particular frustrations – that are intractable. And they are intractable because their satisfaction is too exactly imagined. They are frustrations for which no liberating redescriptions are available. As though certain kinds of frustration have their own momentum, their own inner logic. A person who is hungry needs to eat, but not all needs are like hunger; and we may wonder why (or how) they are not. ‘Knowledge liberates,’ Isaiah Berlin writes in his ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’, ‘not by offering us more open possibilities amongst which we can make our choice, but by preserving us from the frustration of attempting the impossible.’ The frustration of attempting the impossible – if such a statement is to be intelligible – may depend more upon our knowledge of frustration than on our knowledge of what is possible. The frustration in attempting the impossible is guaranteed; when it comes to wanting, is there liberating knowledge of what is possible?

Possibility can only be born of experiment, of risk. Both Lear and Gloucester ask their (favourite) children for something – for love and for death – and they are both refused. Both their claims – for special love and assisted suicide – are felt to be impossible by Cordelia and Edgar. Clearly, parents and children want the impossible from each other. This is the tragedy of everyday life. And yet Freud, followed, among others, by Bion, is asking us to imagine something that is seemingly wildly improbable: that there can only be unrealistic wanting, but that unrealistic wanting can only be satisfied by realistic satisfactions; everything else being frustration in disguise, rage and vengefulness, what Cavell calls the murdering of the world. We need, in other words, to know something about what we don’t get, and about the importance of not getting it.

In the world of relationships, we often seek clear and concrete guidelines. We’re drawn to the promise of “five steps to a healthier relationship” or “three secrets to lasting love.” While such pointers have their place, the reality of human emotions and connections is frustratingly more complex.

These paradoxical signifiers in the realm of Eros are captured well by the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan, who famously wrote: “Love is giving something you don’t have to someone who doesn’t want it.” Love involves offering emotional investment and affection, even when we might feel inadequate or empty ourselves, to someone who may not necessarily desire or understand what we are trying to offer them in the same way. Perhaps this is because what we are offering another is not necessarily a tangible ‘something’, but an illusion of completeness, because we ourselves are always subjects-in-process, never fully complete or fully known. Thus, love becomes an attempt to give from our own perceived inadequacy or ‘lack’, symbolizing a desire for connection and understanding, but often with unarticulated (perhaps even unarticulatable) elements that create some of the argy-bargy we refer to as coupledom.

One approach to navigating the complex whirlpool of feelings, perceptions, and imagination in relationships may be to consider them as unfolding across three distinct yet interconnected realms of existence, or ‘orders,’ as defined by the often-confounding Lacan (confounding expressions for confounding Eros?).

Have a think about your relationships (both romantic and otherwise) through the following three lenses:

The Real refers to those aspects of your relationship that resist symbolization – the raw, ineffable, and sometimes unsettling experiences that cannot be fully encapsulated by language. In a romantic relationship, this might be best captured by the scent of your partner’s skin, the warmth of their touch, as well as the inexplicable discomfort during a seemingly benign conversation, or the stubborn patterns of interaction that repeat despite your best efforts. The Real reminds us that some aspects of our relationship exists beyond our conscious control and understanding, in a realm where words fail. And even The One Who Is Supposed to Know (the relationship counsellor or therapist in this case) knows nothing about the Real of your relationship. Which is frustrating as at some level, everything you consciously think, feel or imagine about your relationship stems from this realm. One might see it as the underlying layer of our subjective reality and our perceptions of our partner within that “reality”. All the subconscious patterns of interaction that we engage in with our partners – often unbeknownst to us – are manifestations of the Real. These patterns invariably shape how we consciously perceive our relationship and how we consciously interact with our partner, and yet cannot be fully accessed. They are inaccessible to language in the way that the pain of stubbing your toe is inaccessible to language. Ouch, you say, or something more sweary. But can any of those words capture the real of that pain?

The Symbolic can be known and described. This is because the Symbolic is language itself, involving the structures, societal norms, and the vocabulary which gives meaning to our relationships. It’s the bedrock of that which defines ‘coupledom’, we might say, covering everything from the legal contract of a marriage to the unspoken rules of a casual fling. It includes our understanding of roles (e.g., husband, wife, partner), norms (e.g., monogamy or polyamory, commitment or denial), and expectations about relationship stages and events (e.g., dating, moving in together, having children).

The Imaginary, which is perhaps where we spend the most time, both in our own individual consciousness, as well as our thoughts about our relationship, encompasses our mental images, dreams, and narratives about “us”. It houses our fantasies of our ideal and non-ideal partner, our narrative of the perfect love story (for us), and our projections of future bliss. The Imaginary is thus also most closely tied to our Egoic dimension or person-ality. The Imaginary order often traps us in the realm of ‘shoulds’ and ‘oughts’, ensnaring us in a cycle of unrealized expectations and resulting disappointments.

WHY SHOULD COUPLES PAY ATTENTION TO THESE THREE ORDERS?

Simply put, they are fundamental aspects of our relationships, offering us new ways of understanding our feelings, actions, and interactions. By recognizing and examining these orders, we can hopefully deepen our understanding of ourselves and our partners, navigating our relationships with greater awareness and authenticity.

For example, when couples grapple with recurring arguments that never seem to resolve, they might be brushing against elements of the Real. Understanding this can help them accept that some parts of their relationship will always remain elusive and may not be ‘resolved’ (or even resolvable) in the conventional sense. However, there is always the option to learn to sit with these discomforts and find ways to manage recurring patterns more effectively.

In contrast, the Symbolic offers a tool for couples to understand how societal expectations and norms influence their relationship. Couples can gain insight into whether they’re following certain ‘rules’ because they genuinely align with them or because they’re conforming to societal pressure. This understanding allows couples to challenge and renegotiate the ‘terms’ of their relationship, fostering a connection that truly reflects their individual and shared values.

Finally, the Imaginary encourages couples to explore their fantasies and expectations. This exploration can reveal where they may be holding onto unrealistic images of their partner or their relationship. With this insight, couples can work towards accepting their partners as they are, and not as they ‘should’ be, cultivating a more genuine and satisfying connection.

With this in mind, perhaps you might want to sit down with your partner and have a chat about some of the exploratory questions below. Another great way of exploring this, is for each of you to journal separately each day on one or two of these questions, and then share some of this writing with your partner in the spirit of openness, curiosity, and mutual understanding. Engaging in such reflection and dialogue can (ideally) foster a deeper connection, revealing the subtle undercurrents of your relationship that often remain unspoken, yet profoundly influence your shared experiences.

REFLECTION QUESTIONS:

The Real:

1. What are some of the raw emotions you feel in your relationship?
2. What is the undeniable reality of your relationship that is hard to put into words?
3. How do you feel physically when you are around your partner?
4. What kind of unfiltered experiences do you have with your partner that you can’t articulate?
5. What aspects of your relationship do you find most difficult to talk about or express?
6. Are there patterns of behaviour in your relationship that you find hard to understand or explain?
7. What emotions do you experience in your relationship that surprise you?
8. Do you ever feel a sense of discomfort or even trauma in your relationship that you can’t put your finger on?
9. Are there certain feelings or reactions that you can’t control when you’re with your partner?
10. What are some physical sensations you experience when you are with your partner?
11. How does the presence of your partner affect you in unspoken ways?
12. Are there aspects of your relationship that you find incomprehensible or confusing?
13. What aspects of your partner do you find unpredictable or surprising?
14. Do you ever find yourself reacting to your partner in ways you don’t fully understand?
15. How do you cope with the uncertainties and ambiguities in your relationship?
16. What unspoken tensions exist in your relationship?
17. Are there any fears or anxieties you have in the relationship that you find hard to articulate?
18. What elements of your relationship feel beyond your control?
19. Are there any unspeakable aspects in your relationship?
20. How do you experience the physical intimacy in your relationship?

The Symbolic:

1. How do societal expectations about relationships influence your relationship?
2. What role do language and communication play in your relationship?
3. What rules or norms do you follow in your relationship?
4. How do you define roles in your relationship?
5. What expectations do you have about your partner’s behavior and how do they align with societal norms?
6. How do you negotiate the balance of power and decision-making in your relationship?
7. How do your cultural or familial traditions impact your relationship?
8. How do legal or institutional aspects of being a couple affect your relationship (e.g., marriage, cohabitation)?
9. How do societal norms about gender roles affect your relationship?
10. How does the way you talk about your relationship affect your relationship?
11. What societal or cultural challenges do you face in your relationship?
12. How do you address disagreements or conflicts in your relationship?
13. What are your expectations about commitment in the relationship and how do they align with societal standards?
14. How does the label of “being in a relationship” affect your dynamic?
15. Are there societal pressures that influence your relationship?
16. How do you navigate societal expectations versus your individual desires in your relationship?
17. How does your relationship compare to societal models or examples of relationships (e.g., in media, in your social circles)?
18. How do societal rules about fidelity and monogamy play out in your relationship?
19. How do you express affection and intimacy in ways that are influenced by societal norms?
20. How does your relationship fit into or diverge from societal narratives about love and partnership?

The Imaginary:

1. What fantasies or expectations do you have about your relationship?
2. How do you perceive your partner in your mind’s eye?
3. Do you have an ideal image of your partner? If so, how does it match with the reality?
4. What expectations do you have of your partner that they are not meeting?
5. Do you have fantasies about your future together?
6. How does your partner differ from your “ideal” partner?
7. How do you imagine a perfect day with your partner?
8. Are there narratives about your relationship that you play out in your head?
9. How do your desires and dreams about your relationship affect your interactions with your partner?
10. Are there things about your partner that disappoint you because they don’t meet your expectations?
11. What were your initial expectations about your relationship, and how have they changed?
12. How do your fantasies about love and relationships influence your actual relationship?
13. What illusions do you hold about your relationship?
14. How do you idealize or romanticize your relationship?
15. What roles do you imagine for yourself and your partner in your relationship?
16. How do you visualize your relationship evolving in the future?
17. Are there films, books, or other media that influence your perceptions of your relationship?
18. How do you imagine your partner sees you?
19. How do you think your relationship should be versus how it actually is?
20. Are there any unfulfilled dreams or fantasies you have in your relationship?

12

I envy – but I’m not sure that I envy – those for whom a biography could be written, or who could write their own. In these random impressions, and with no desire to be other than random, I indifferently narrate my factless autobiography, my lifeless history. These are my Confessions, and if in them I say nothing, it’s because I have nothing to say.

What is there to confess that’s worthwhile or useful? What has happened to us has happened to everyone or only to us; if to everyone, then it’s no novelty, and if only to us, then it won’t be understood. If I write what I feel, it’s to reduce the fever of feeling. What I confess is unimportant, because everything is unimportant. I make landscapes out of what I feel. I make holidays of my sensations. I can easily understand women who embroider out of sorrow or who crochet because life exists. My elderly aunt would play solitaire throughout the endless evening. These confessions of what I feel are my solitaire. I don’t interpret them like those who read cards to tell the future. I don’t probe them, because in solitaire the cards don’t have any special significance. I unwind myself like a multicoloured skein, or I make string figures of myself, like those woven on spread fingers and passed from child to child. I take care only that my thumb not miss its loop. Then I turn over my hand and the figure changes. And I start over.

To live is to crochet according to a pattern we were given. But while doing it the mind is at liberty, and all enchanted princes can stroll in their parks between one and another plunge of the hooked ivory needle. Needlework of things… Intervals… Nothing…

Besides, what can I expect from myself? My sensations in all their horrible acuity, and a profound awareness of feeling… A sharp mind that only destroys me, and an unusual capacity for dreaming to keep me entertained… A dead will and a reflection that cradles it, like a living child… Yes, crochet…

13

My deplorable condition isn’t in the least affected by these words I join together to form, little by little, my haphazard book of musings. My worthless self lives on at the bottom of every expression, like an indissoluble residue at the bottom of a glass from which only water was drunk. I write my literature as I write my ledger entries – carefully and indifferently. Next to the vast starry sky and the enigma of so many souls, the night of the unknown abyss and the chaos of nothing making sense – next to all this, what I write in the ledger and what I write on this paper that tells my soul are equally confined to the Rua dos Douradores, woefully little in the face of the universe’s millionaire expanses.

All of this is dream and phantasmagoria, and it matters little whether the dream be of ledger entries or of well-crafted prose. Does dreaming of princesses serve a better purpose than dreaming of the front door to the office? All that we know is our own impression, and all that we are is an exterior impression, a melodrama in which we, the self-aware actors, are also our own spectators, our own gods by permission of some department or other at City Hall.

14

We may know that the work we continue to put off doing will be bad. Worse, however, is the work we never do. A work that’s finished is at least finished. It may be poor, but it exists, like the miserable plant in the lone flowerpot of my neighbour who’s crippled. That plant is her happiness, and sometimes it’s even mine. What I write, bad as it is, may provide some hurt or sad soul a few moments of distraction from something worse. That’s enough for me, or it isn’t enough, but it serves some purpose, and so it is with all of life.

A tedium that includes the expectation of nothing but more tedium; a regret, right now, for the regret I’ll have tomorrow for having felt regret today – huge confusions with no point and no truth, huge confusions…

…where, curled up on a bench in a railway station, my contempt dozes in the cloak of my discouragement…

…the world of dreamed images which are the sum of my knowledge as well as of my life…

To heed the present moment isn’t a great or lasting concern of mine. I crave time in all its duration, and I want to be myself unconditionally.

15

Inch by inch I conquered the inner terrain I was born with. Bit by bit I reclaimed the swamp in which I’d languished. I gave birth to my infinite being, but I had to wrench myself out of me with forceps.

16

I daydream between Cascais* and Lisbon. I went to Cascais to pay a property tax for my boss, Senhor Vasques, on a house he owns in Estoril.* I took anticipated pleasure in the trip, an hour each way in which to enjoy the forever changing views of the wide river and its Atlantic estuary. But on actually going out there, I lost myself in abstract contemplations, seeing but not seeing the riverscapes I’d looked forward to seeing, while on the way back I lost myself in mentally nailing down those sensations. I wouldn’t be able to describe the slightest detail of the trip, the slightest scrap of what there was to see. What I got out of it are these pages, the fruit of contradiction and forgetting. I don’t know if this is better or worse than the contrary, nor do I know what the contrary is.

The train slows down, we’re at Cais do Sodré.* I’ve arrived at Lisbon, but not at a conclusion.

17

Perhaps it’s finally time for me to make this one effort: to take a good look at my life. I see myself in the midst of a vast desert. I tell what I literarily was yesterday, and I try to explain to myself how I got here.

18

With merely a kind of smile in my soul, I passively consider the definitive confinement of my life to the Rua dos Douradores, to this office, to the people who surround me. An income sufficient for food and drink, a roof over my head, and a little free time in which to dream and write, to sleep – what more can I ask of the Gods or expect from Destiny?

I’ve had great ambitions and boundless dreams, but so has the delivery boy* or the seamstress, because everyone has dreams. What distinguishes certain of us is our capacity for fulfilling them, or our destiny that they be fulfilled.

In dreams I am equal to the delivery boy and the seamstress. I differ from them only in knowing how to write. Yes, writing is an act, a personal circumstance that distinguishes me from them. But in my soul I’m their equal.

I realize that there are islands to the South and great cosmopolitan attractions and…..

If I had the world in my hand, I’m quite sure I would trade it for a ticket to Rua dos Douradores.

Perhaps my destiny is to remain forever a bookkeeper, with poetry or literature as a butterfly that alights on my head, making me look ridiculous to the extent it looks beautiful.

I’ll miss Moreira, but what’s that next to a glorious promotion?

I know that the day I become head bookkeeper of Vasques & Co. will be one of the great days of my life. I know it with foretasted bitterness and irony, but also with the intellectual advantage of certainty.

19

In the cove on the seashore, among the woods and meadows that fronted the beach, the fickleness of inflamed desire rose out of the uncertainty of the blank abyss. To choose the wheat or to choose the many [sic] was all the same, and the distance kept going, through cypress trees.

The magic power of words in isolation, or joined together on the basis of sound, with inner reverberations and divergent meanings even as they converge, the splendour of phrases inserted between the meanings of other phrases, the virulence of vestiges, the hope of the woods, and the absolute peacefulness of the ponds on the farms of my childhood of ruses… And so, within the high walls of absurd audacity, in the rows of trees and in the startled tremors of what withers, someone other than me would hear from sad lips the confession denied to more insistent parties. Never again, not even if the knights were to come back on the road that was visible from the top of the wall, would there be peace in the Castle of the Last Souls, where lances jangled in the unseen courtyard, nor would any other name on this side of the road be remembered but the one which at night would enchant, like the Moorish ladies of folklore,* the child who later died to life and to wonder.

Over the furrows in the grass, like remembrances of what was to come, the treading of the last lost men sounded ever so lightly, their dragging steps opening nothings in the restless greenery. Those who would come were bound to be old, and only the young would never arrive. The drums rumbled on the roadside, and the bugles hung uselessly from exhausted arms that would have dropped them if they still had strength enough to drop something.

But when the illusion was over, the dead clamour sounded yet again, and the dogs could be seen nervously hesitating on the tree-lined paths. It was all absurd, like mourning the dead, and princesses from other people’s dreams strolled about freely and indefinitely.

20

Whenever I’ve tried to free my life from a set of the circumstances that continuously oppress it, I’ve been instantly surrounded by other circumstances of the same order, as if the inscrutable web of creation were irrevocably at odds with me. I yank from my neck a hand that was choking me, and I see that my own hand is tied to a noose that fell around my neck when I freed it from the stranger’s hand. When I gingerly remove the noose, it’s with my own hands that I nearly strangle myself.

21

Whether or not they exist, we’re slaves to the gods.

22

The image of myself I saw in mirrors is the same one I hold against the bosom of my soul. I could never be anything but frail and hunched over, even in my thoughts.

Everything about me belongs to a glossy prince pasted, along with other decals, in the old album of a little boy who died long ago.

To love myself is to feel sorry for myself. Perhaps one day, towards the end of the future, someone will write a poem about me, and I’ll begin to reign in my Kingdom.

God is the fact that we exist and that’s not all.

23

ABSURDITY

Let’s act like sphinxes, however falsely, until we reach the point of no longer knowing who we are. For we are, in fact, false sphinxes, with no idea of what we are in reality. The only way to be in agreement with life is to disagree with ourselves. Absurdity is divine.

Let’s develop theories, patiently and honestly thinking them out, in order to promptly act against them – acting and justifying our actions with new theories that condemn them. Let’s cut a path in life and then go immediately against that path. Let’s adopt all the poses and gestures of something we aren’t and don’t wish to be, and don’t even wish to be taken for being.

Let’s buy books so as not to read them; let’s go to concerts without caring to hear the music or to see who’s there; let’s take long walks because we’re sick of walking; and let’s spend whole days in the country, just because it bores us.

24

Today, feeling almost physically ill because of that age-old anxiety which sometimes wells up, I ate and drank rather less than usual in the first-floor dining room of the restaurant responsible for perpetuating my existence. And as I was leaving, the waiter, having noted that the bottle of wine was still half full, turned to me and said: ‘So long, Senhor Soares, and I hope you feel better.’

The trumpet blast of this simple phrase relieved my soul like a sudden wind clearing the sky of clouds. And I realized something I had never really thought about: with these café and restaurant waiters, with barbers and with the delivery boys on street corners I enjoy a natural, spontaneous rapport that I can’t say I have with those I supposedly know more intimately.

Camaraderie has its subtleties.

Some govern the world, others are the world. Between an American millionaire, a Caesar or Napoleon, or Lenin, and the Socialist leader of a small town, there’s a difference in quantity but not of quality. Below them there’s us, the unnoticed: the reckless playwright William Shakespeare, John Milton the schoolteacher, Dante Alighieri the tramp, the delivery boy who ran an errand for me yesterday, the barber who tells me jokes, and the waiter who just now demonstrated his camaraderie by wishing me well, after noticing I’d drunk only half the wine.

25

It’s a hopelessly bad lithograph. I stare at it without knowing if I see it. It’s one among others in the shop window – in the middle of the window under the steps.

She holds Spring against her breast and stares at me with sad eyes. Her smile shines, because the paper’s glossy, and her cheeks are red. The sky behind her is the colour of light blue cloth. She has a sculpted, almost tiny mouth, and above its postcard expression her eyes keep staring at me with an enormous sorrow. The arm holding the flowers reminds me of someone else’s. Her dress or blouse has a low neck that reveals one shoulder. Her eyes are genuinely sad: they stare at me from the depth of the lithographic reality with a truth of some sort. She came with Spring. Her eyes are large, but that’s not what makes them sad. I tear myself from the window with violent steps. I cross the street and turn around with impotent indignation. She still holds the Spring she was given, and her eyes are sad like all the things in life I’ve missed out on. Seen from a distance, the lithograph turns out to be more colourful. The figure’s hair is tied at the top by a pinker than pink ribbon; I hadn’t noticed. In human eyes, even in lithographic ones, there’s something terrible: the inevitable warning of consciousness, the silent shout that there’s a soul there. With a huge effort I pull out of the sleep in which I was steeped, and like a dog I shake off the drops of dark fog. Oblivious to my departure, as if bidding farewell to something else, those sad eyes of the whole of life – of this metaphysical lithograph that we observe from a distance – stare at me as if I knew something of God. The print, which has a calendar at the bottom, is framed above and below by two flatly curved, badly painted black strips. Within these upper and lower limits, above 1929 and an outmoded calligraphic vignette adorning the inevitable 1st of January, the sad eyes ironically smile at me.

Funny where I knew that figure from. In the corner at the back of the office there’s an identical calendar which I’ve seen countless times, but due to some lithographic mystery, or some mystery of my own, the eyes of the office copy express no sorrow. It’s just a lithograph. (Printed on glossy paper, it sleeps away its subdued life above the head of left-handed Alves.)

All of this makes me want to smile, but I feel a profound anxiety. I feel the chill of a sudden sickness in my soul. I don’t have the strength to balk at this absurdity. What window overlooking what secret of God am I confronting against my will? Where does the window under the stairs lead to? What eyes stared at me from out of the lithograph? I’m practically trembling. I involuntarily raise my eyes to the far corner of the office where the real lithograph is. I keep raising my eyes to that corner of the office where the real lithograph is. I keep raising my eyes to that corner.

26

To give each emotion a personality, a heart to each state of the heart!

The girls came around the bend in a large group. They sang as they walked, and the sound of their voices was happy. I don’t know who or what they might be. I listened to them for a time from afar, without a feeling of my own, but a feeling of sorrow for them impressed itself on my heart.

For their future? For their unconsciousness?

Not directly for them, and perhaps, after all, only for me.

27

Literature – which is art married to thought, and realization untainted by reality – seems to me the end towards which all human effort would have to strive, if it were truly human and not just a welling up of our animal self. To express something is to conserve its virtue and take away its terror. Fields are greener in their description than in their actual greenness. Flowers, if described with phrases that define them in the air of the imagination, will have colours with a durability not found in cellular life.

What moves lives. What is said endures. There’s nothing in life that’s less real for having been well described. Small-minded critics point out that such-and-such poem, with its protracted cadences, in the end says merely that it’s a nice day. But to say it’s a nice day is difficult, and the nice day itself passes on. It’s up to us to conserve the nice day in a wordy, florid memory, sprinkling new flowers and new stars over the fields and skies of the empty, fleeting outer world.

Everything is what we are, and everything will be, for those who come after us in the diversity of time, what we will have intensely imagined – what we, that is, by embodying our imagination, will have actually been. The grand, tarnished panorama of History amounts, as I see it, to a flow of interpretations, a confused consensus of unreliable eyewitness accounts. The novelist is all of us, and we narrate whenever we see, because seeing is complex like everything.

Right now I have so many fundamental thoughts, so many truly metaphysical things to say that I suddenly feel tired, and I’ve decided to write no more, think no more. I’ll let the fever of saying put me to sleep instead, and with closed eyes I’ll stroke, as if petting a cat, all that I might have said.

28

A breath of music or of a dream, of something that would make me almost feel, something that would make me not think.

1

I was born in a time when the majority of young people had lost faith in God, for the same reason their elders had had it – without knowing why. And since the human spirit naturally tends to make judgements based on feeling instead of reason, most of these young people chose Humanity to replace God. I, however, am the sort of person who is always on the fringe of what he belongs to, seeing not only the multitude he’s a part of but also the wide-open spaces around it. That’s why I didn’t give up God as completely as they did, and I never accepted Humanity. I reasoned that God, while improbable, might exist, in which case he should be worshipped; whereas Humanity, being a mere biological idea and signifying nothing more than the animal species we belong to, was no more deserving of worship than any other animal species. The cult of Humanity, with its rites of Freedom and Equality, always struck me as a revival of those ancient cults in which gods were like animals or had animal heads.

And so, not knowing how to believe in God and unable to believe in an aggregate of animals, I, along with other people on the fringe, kept a distance from things, a distance commonly called Decadence. Decadence is the total loss of unconsciousness, which is the very basis of life. Could it think, the heart would stop beating.

For those few like me who live without knowing how to have life, what’s left but renunciation as our way and contemplation as our destiny? Not knowing nor able to know what religious life is, since faith isn’t acquired through reason, and unable to have faith in or even react to the abstract notion of man, we’re left with the aesthetic contemplation of life as our reason for having a soul. Impassive to the solemnity of any and all worlds, indifferent to the divine, and disdainers of what is human, we uselessly surrender ourselves to pointless sensation, cultivated in a refined Epicureanism, as befits our cerebral nerves.

Retaining from science only its fundamental precept – that everything is subject to fatal laws, which we cannot freely react to since the laws themselves determine all reactions – and seeing how this precept concurs with the more ancient one of the divine fatality of things, we abdicate from every effort like the weak-bodied from athletic endeavours, and we hunch over the book of sensations like scrupulous scholars of feeling.

Taking nothing seriously and recognizing our sensations as the only reality we have for certain, we take refuge there, exploring them like large unknown countries. And if we apply ourselves diligently not only to aesthetic contemplation but also to the expression of its methods and results, it’s because the poetry or prose we write – devoid of any desire to move anyone else’s will or to mould anyone’s understanding – is merely like when a reader reads out loud to fully objectify the subjective pleasure of reading.

We’re well aware that every creative work is imperfect and that our most dubious aesthetic contemplation will be the one whose object is what we write. But everything is imperfect. There’s no sunset so lovely it couldn’t be yet lovelier, no gentle breeze bringing us sleep that couldn’t bring a yet sounder sleep. And so, contemplators of statues and mountains alike, enjoying both books and the passing days, and dreaming all things so as to transform them into our own substance, we will also write down descriptions and analyses which, when they’re finished, will become extraneous things that we can enjoy as if they happened along one day.

This isn’t the viewpoint of pessimists like Vigny,* for whom life was a prison in which he wove straw to keep busy and forget. To be a pessimist is to see everything tragically, an attitude that’s both excessive and uncomfortable. While it’s true that we ascribe no value to the work we produce and that we produce it to keep busy, we’re not like the prisoner who busily weaves straw to forget about his fate; we’re like the girl who embroiders pillows for no other reason than to keep busy.

I see life as a roadside inn where I have to stay until the coach from the abyss pulls up. I don’t know where it will take me, because I don’t know anything. I could see this inn as a prison, for I’m compelled to wait in it; I could see it as a social centre, for it’s here that I meet others. But I’m neither impatient nor common. I leave who will to stay shut up in their rooms, sprawled out on beds where they sleeplessly wait, and I leave who will to chat in the parlours, from where their songs and voices conveniently drift out here to me. I’m sitting at the door, feasting my eyes and ears on the colours and sounds of the landscape, and I softly sing – for myself alone – wispy songs I compose while waiting.

Night will fall on us all and the coach will pull up. I enjoy the breeze I’m given and the soul I was given to enjoy it with, and I no longer question or seek. If what I write in the book of travellers can, when read by others at some future date, also entertain them on their journey, then fine. If they don’t read it, or are not entertained, that’s fine too.

2

I have to choose what I detest – either dreaming, which my intelligence hates, or action, which my sensibility loathes; either action, for which I wasn’t born, or dreaming, for which no one was born.

Detesting both, I choose neither; but since I must on occasion either dream or act, I mix the two things together.

3

I love the stillness of early summer evenings downtown, and especially the stillness made more still by contrast, on the streets that seethe with activity by day. Rua do Arsenal, Rua da Alfândega, the sad streets extending eastward from where the Rua da Alfândega ends, the entire stretch along the quiet docks – all of this comforts me with sadness when on these evenings I enter the solitude of their ensemble. I slip into an era prior to the one I’m living in; I enjoy feeling that I’m a contemporary of Cesário Verde,* and that in me I have, not verses like his, but the identical substance of the verses that were his.

Walking on these streets, until the night falls, my life feels to me like the life they have. By day they’re full of meaningless activity; by night they’re full of a meaningless lack of it. By day I am nothing, and by night I am I. There is no difference between me and these streets, save they being streets and I a soul, which perhaps is irrelevant when we consider the essence of things. There is an equal, abstract destiny for men and for things; both have an equally indifferent designation in the algebra of the world’s mystery.

But there’s something else… In these languid and empty hours, a sadness felt by my entire being rises from my soul to my mind – a bitter awareness that everything is a sensation of mine and at the same time something external, something not in my power to change. Ah, how often my own dreams have raised up before me as things, not to replace reality but to declare themselves its equals, in so far as I scorn them and they exist apart from me, like the tram now turning the corner at the end of the street, or like the voice of an evening crier, crying I don’t know what but with a sound that stands out – an Arabian chant like the sudden patter of a fountain – against the monotony of twilight!

Future married couples pass by, chatting seamstresses pass by, young men in a hurry for pleasure pass by, those who have retired from everything smoke on their habitual stroll, and at one or another doorway a shopkeeper stands like an idle vagabond, hardly noticing a thing. Army recruits – some of them brawny, others slight – slowly drift along in noisy and worse-than-noisy clusters. Occasionally someone quite ordinary goes by. Cars at that time of day are rare, and their noise is musical. In my heart there’s a peaceful anguish, and my calm is made of resignation.

All of this passes, and none of it means anything to me. It’s all foreign to my fate, and even to fate as a whole. It’s just unconsciousness, curses of protest when chance hurls stones, echoes of unknown voices – a collective mishmash of life.

4

… and from the majestic heights of my dreams, I return to being an assistant bookkeeper in the city of Lisbon.

But the contrast doesn’t overwhelm me, it frees me. And its irony is my blood. What should theoretically humiliate me is what I unfurl as my flag; and the laughter I should be using to laugh at myself is a bugle I blow to herald – and to create – a dawn into which I’m transformed.

The nocturnal glory of being great without being anything! The sombre majesty of splendours no one knows… And I suddenly experience the sublime feeling of a monk in the wilderness or of a hermit in his retreat, acquainted with the substance of Christ in the sands and in the caves of withdrawal from the world.

And at this table in my absurd room, I, a pathetic and anonymous office clerk, write words as if they were the soul’s salvation, and I gild myself with the impossible sunset of high and vast hills in the distance, with the statue I received in exchange for life’s pleasures, and with the ring of renunciation on my evangelical finger, the stagnant jewel of my ecstatic disdain.

5

I have before me, on the slanted surface of the old desk, the two large pages of the ledger, from which I lift my tired eyes and an even more tired soul. Beyond the nothing that this represents, there’s the warehouse with its uniform rows of shelves, uniform employees, human order, and tranquil banality – all the way to the wall that fronts the Rua dos Douradores. Through the window the sound of another reality arrives, and the sound is banal, like the tranquillity around the shelves.

I lower new eyes to the two white pages, on which my careful numbers have entered the firm’s results. And smiling to myself I remember that life, which contains these pages with fabric types, prices and sales, blank spaces, letters and ruled lines, also includes the great navigators, the great saints, and the poets of every age, not one of whom enters the books – a vast progeny banished from those who determine the world’s worth.

In the very act of entering the name of an unfamiliar cloth, the doors of the Indus and of Samarkand open up, and Persian poetry (which is from yet another place), with its quatrains whose third lines don’t rhyme, is a distant anchor for me in my disquiet. But I make no mistake: I write, I add, and the bookkeeping goes on, performed as usual by an employee of this office.

6

I asked for very little from life, and even this little was denied me. A nearby field, a ray of sunlight, a little bit of calm along with a bit of bread, not to feel oppressed by the knowledge that I exist, not to demand anything from others, and not to have others demand anything from me – this was denied me, like the spare change we might deny a beggar not because we’re mean-hearted but because we don’t feel like unbuttoning our coat.

Sadly I write in my quiet room, alone as I have always been, alone as I will always be. And I wonder if my apparently negligible voice might not embody the essence of thousands of voices, the longing for self-expression of thousands of lives, the patience of millions of souls resigned like my own to their daily lot, their useless dreams, and their hopeless hopes. In these moments my heart beats faster because I’m conscious of it. I live more because I live on high. I feel a religious force within me, a species of prayer, a kind of public outcry. But my mind quickly puts me in my place… I remember that I’m on the fourth floor of the Rua dos Douradores, and I take a drowsy look at myself. I glance up from this half-written page at life, futile and without beauty, and at the cheap cigarette I’m about to extinguish in the ashtray beyond the fraying blotter. Me in this fourth-floor room, interrogating life!, saying what souls feel!, writing prose like a genius or a famous author! Me, here, a genius!…

7

Today, in one of the pointless and worthless daydreams that constitute a large part of my inner life, I imagined being forever free from the Rua dos Douradores, from Vasques my boss, from Moreira the head bookkeeper, from all the employees, from the delivery boy, the office boy and the cat. In my dream I experienced freedom, as if the South Seas had offered me marvellous islands to be discovered. It would all be repose, artistic achievement, the intellectual fulfilment of my being.

But even as I was imagining this, during my miniature midday holiday in a café, an unpleasant thought assaulted my dream: I realized I would feel regret. Yes, I say it as if confronted by the actual circumstance: I would feel regret. Vasques my boss, Moreira the head bookkeeper, Borges the cashier, all the young men, the cheerful boy who takes letters to the post office, the boy who makes deliveries, the gentle cat – all this has become part of my life. And I wouldn’t be able to leave it without crying, without feeling that – like it or not – it was a part of me which would remain with all of them, and that to separate myself from them would be a partial death.

Besides, if tomorrow I were to bid them all farewell and take off my Rua dos Douradores suit, what other activity would I end up doing (for I would have to do something), or what other suit would I end up wearing (for I would have to wear some other suit)?

We all have a Vasques who’s the boss – visible for some of us, invisible for others. My Vasques goes by that very name, and he’s a hale and pleasant man, occasionally short-tempered but never two-faced, self-interested but basically fair, with a sense of justice that’s lacking in many great geniuses and human marvels of civilization, right and left. Other people answer to vanity, or to the lure of wealth, glory, immortality. For my boss I prefer the man named Vasques, who in difficult moments is easier to deal with than all the abstract bosses in the world.

Deeming that I earn too little, a friend of mine who’s a partner in a successful firm that does a lot of business with the government said the other day: ‘You’re being exploited, Soares.’ And I remembered that indeed I am. But since in life we must all be exploited, I wonder if it’s any worse to be exploited by Vasques and his fabrics than by vanity, by glory, by resentment, by envy or by the impossible.

Some are exploited by God himself, and they are prophets and saints in this vacuous world.

And in the same way that others return to their homes, I retreat to my non-home: the large office on the Rua dos Douradores. I arrive at my desk as at a bulwark against life. I have a tender spot – tender to the point of tears – for my ledgers in which I keep other people’s accounts, for the old inkstand I use, for the hunched back of Sérgio, who draws up invoices a little beyond where I sit. I love all this, perhaps because I have nothing else to love, and perhaps also because nothing is worth a human soul’s love, and so it’s all the same – should we feel the urge to give it – whether the recipient be the diminutive form of my inkstand or the vast indifference of the stars.

8

Vasques – the boss. At times I’m inexplicably hypnotized by Senhor Vasques. What is this man to me besides an occasional obstacle, as the owner of my time, in the daylight hours of my life? He treats me well and is polite when he talks to me, except on his grumpy days, when he’s fretting about something and isn’t polite to anyone. But why does he occupy my thoughts? Is he a symbol? A cause? What is he?

Vasques – the boss. I already remember him in the future with the nostalgia I know I’m bound to feel. I’ll be peacefully ensconced in a small house on the outskirts of somewhere or other, enjoying a tranquillity in which I won’t write the works I don’t write now, and to keep on not writing them I’ll come up with even better excuses than the ones I use today to elude myself. Or I’ll be in an institution for paupers, happy in my utter defeat, mixed up with the rabble of would-be geniuses who were no more than beggars with dreams, thrown in with the anonymous throng of those who didn’t have strength enough to conquer nor renunciation enough to conquer by not competing. Wherever I may be, I’ll miss Senhor Vasques and the office on the Rua dos Douradores, and the monotony of my daily life will be like the remembrance of the loves that never came my way and the triumphs that weren’t to be mine.

Vasques – the boss. I see him today from that future as I see him today from right here: medium height, stocky, a bit coarse but affectionate, frank and savvy, brusque and affable, a boss not only in his handling of money but also in his unhurried hands, in their thick hair and veins that look like small coloured muscles, in his full but not fat neck, and in his ruddy and taut cheeks with their dark, always close-shaven whiskers. I see him, I see his energetically deliberate gestures, his eyes thinking within about things outside. It displeases me when I’ve somehow displeased him, and my soul rejoices when he smiles, with his broad and human smile, like an applauding crowd.

Perhaps the lack of some more distinguished figure in my immediate world explains why Senor Vasques, a common and even brutish man, sometimes gets so enmeshed in my thoughts that I forget myself. I believe there’s a symbol here. I believe or almost believe that somewhere, in a remote life, this man was something much more important to me than he is today.

9

Ah, I understand! Vasques my boss is Life – monotonous and necessary, imperious and inscrutable Life. This banal man represents the banality of Life. For me he is everything, externally speaking, because for me Life is whatever is external.

And if the office on the Rua dos Douradores represents life for me, the fourth-floor room* where I live, on this same Rua dos Douradores, represents Art for me. Yes, Art, residing on the very same street as Life, but in a different place. Art, which gives me relief from life without relieving me of living, being as monotonous as life itself, only in a different place. Yes, for me the Rua dos Douradores contains the meaning of everything and the answer to all riddles, except for the riddle of why riddles exist, which can never be answered.

10

Futile and sensitive, I’m capable of violent and consuming impulses – both good and bad, noble and vile – but never of a sentiment that endures, never of an emotion that continues, entering into the substance of my soul. Everything in me tends to go on to become something else. My soul is impatient with itself, as with a bothersome child; its restlessness keeps growing and is forever the same. Everything interests me, but nothing holds me. I attend to everything, dreaming all the while. I note the slightest facial movements of the person I’m talking with, I record the subtlest inflections of his utterances; but I hear without listening, I’m thinking of something else, and what I least catch in the conversation is the sense of what was said, by me or by him. And so I often repeat to someone what I’ve already repeated, or ask him again what he’s already answered. But I’m able to describe, in four photographic words, the facial muscles he used to say what I don’t recall, or the way he listened with his eyes to the words I don’t remember telling him. I’m two, and both keep their distance – Siamese twins that aren’t attached.

11

LITANY

We never know self-realization.

We are two abysses – a well staring at the sky.

—

SUMMARY AND QUESTION:

Fragment 1: Pessoa feels like an outsider, finding comfort in examining his feelings.

* In what way do you experience yourself as “being on the fringe” of things? Is that a torment for you, or a pleasure, or both?

* Do you consider yourself to be “a scholar of feelings”? In what way do you undertake this scholarship?

Fragment 2: Pessoa lacks faith in both God and humanity.

* What do you believe in?

Fragment 3: Contemplating aesthetics consoles Pessoa against life’s monotony.

* In what way does the aesthetic contemplation of life, as it is described here, bring you solace and consolation?

Fragment 4: Pessoa sees his life as an inn where he waits for death.

* What kind of “roadside inn” is your life at the moment?

Fragment 5: Pessoa’s life is out of balance, focused on dreaming over action.

* What is the ratio of action versus dreaming in your life? Are you happy with that balance (or imbalance)?

Fragment 6: A profound sadness often arises in Pessoa, overwhelming his senses.

* At what point in your day do you experience “a sadness, felt by your entire being, rising from soul to mind”? How do you manage this sadness?

Fragment 7: Pessoa pursues subjective, aesthetic salvation to cope with reality.

* How do you cultivate your own “salvation” and “renunciation”? What do these two words mean for you?

Fragment 8: Literature and imagination anchor Pessoa amidst anxiety.

* What sort of things “anchor” you in your disquiet?

Fragment 9: Pessoa has grand hopes and dreams but feels fated to mundane reality.

* What are your most “useless dreams” and “hopeless hopes”? What is your best and worst response to living with these?

Fragment 10: Pessoa fantasizes about escaping his drab routine for a more colourful life.

* If you were to take off your current “suit“ of life, what other costumes would you like to wear? And how would you find or manifest these in a real way?

Fragment 11: Pessoa feels exploited by and exploits the world to survive.

* In what ways do you feel exploited in your life? And how are you aware of consciously exploiting others/the natural world?

Building self-esteem is indeed a challenging journey, especially when we consider the complexities involved from a psychological perspective.

According to the psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan, our understanding of the self is framed within the triad of the Imaginary, the Symbolic, and the Real. The Imaginary encompasses the images we use to construct our identity, starting from the stage when we first recognize ourselves in the mirror. The Symbolic refers to our entry into language and societal norms, which shape our understanding of ourselves and the world. The Real is that which is beyond our comprehension because it cannot be fully processed in the Imaginary or Symbolic realm but is always influencing us.

When it comes to self-esteem, we’re constantly negotiating between these realms. Our Imaginary self might project an idealized version of who we wish to be, causing dissatisfaction when compared to our actual selves. The Symbolic, with its societal norms and expectations, might create pressure on us, nudging us to meet standards that might not resonate with our authentic selves. The Real, the aspects of life that we can’t fully comprehend or articulate, can confront us with our limitations and potentially challenge notions of self-esteem built in The Imaginary or Symbolic realm.

Moreover, the unconscious plays a significant role in shaping our perception of ourselves and our self-esteem. If we unconsciously hold beliefs of unworthiness or inadequacy, these beliefs can affect our behaviours and emotional responses, leading to patterns of low self-esteem and self-deprecating behaviours.

Changing unconscious beliefs can be a complex process, but it is not impossible. While it’s true that we can’t directly access our unconscious in the same way we can our conscious thoughts, we can still influence it through various therapeutic techniques and intentional practices. A common one, stemming from Emotion Focused Therapy (EFT) asks us to:

1. Identify and Understand our Emotions: Throughout our day, we can take moments to reflect on our feelings. We might try to name our emotions as accurately as possible. Next, we could examine these emotions: What triggered them? What thoughts are associated with them? How do they manifest in our bodies?

2. Accept and Express Our Emotions: We can accept our emotions without judgment. We should understand that emotions, including negative ones, are normal and informative. We can explore creative outlets like journaling, art, or speaking aloud to express these emotions. This helps create distance between us and the emotions, allowing for better understanding and processing.

3. Reflect and Challenge Emotional Patterns: It is important to reflect on how certain emotions are linked to our self-beliefs. We can reflect on whether these beliefs are accurate or helpful. When we find a belief tied to a negative emotion, we can challenge it: Is it true? Are there more positive beliefs that could replace it?

Weathering Difficult Thoughts, Emotions and Bodily Distress with RAIN is a distillation of the above and comes with its own Guided Meditation Practice if you would like to try that.

When we turn to other practical resources like Nathaniel Branden’s “Six Pillars of Self-Esteem,”, Russ Harris’s “The Confidence Gap” and Matthew McKay and Patrick Fanning’s work “Self-Esteem“, we find some other helpful steers. Here are six practices to think about:

1. Living Consciously: It’s important for us to nurture a greater awareness of ourselves and the world around us, even though it can be challenging as much of our actions, words, and thoughts tend to occur automatically. We could try incorporating mindfulness into our lives by focusing on our breath or tuning into our bodily sensations. This mindful practice can align with Lacan’s Symbolic register, where understanding and consciousness find their roots.

2. Self-Acceptance: We can also try to embrace our strengths, weaknesses, and everything in between. Some find it helpful to practice positive affirmations to help cultivate self-acceptance, despite the societal pressures that the Symbolic order often imposes on us. In his book Enneagram Transformations, Don Riso suggests a series of Transformative Psychological Affirmations and that we might want to reflect on, as well as modify so that they land better with our own psyche and then read aloud (maybe even on a daily basis). You can find the full list of Transformative Mantras here organised according to personality type.

3. Self-Responsibility: We can also try and take greater responsibility for our actions and the outcomes they generate. This involves acknowledging that we have control over our decisions. We can set small, achievable goals each day, and taking steps towards them can boost our sense of competence and self-efficacy.

4. Self-Assertiveness: It’s important for us to respect our needs, wants, and values, and express them in a respectful manner. We can start by speaking up about our preferences, asserting a boundary, or making a choice in small matters, and we could gradually extend this practice to more significant aspects of life.

5. Living Purposefully: We need to identify our goals and values and strive to align our actions with them. Perhaps can try writing down our goals, creating action steps, and regularly reviewing and updating them.

6. Personal Integrity: We can all aim to ensure that our thoughts, words, and actions are congruent and honest. We might reflect on our day, noting where we were and weren’t true to ourselves, and plan how to improve.

It’s crucial for us to remember that building self-esteem is a journey, not a destination. As with any interventions we attempt on our selves, patience and compassion is key throughout this process. Though dealing with the unconscious, navigating the Imaginary and Symbolic, and grappling with the Real can be challenging, these daily practices can support us in building a healthier sense of self.

—

FURTHER READING:

You might also want to look at the following article which presents a daily practice for managing these three different realms: Setting Ourselve Up For The Day – The Lacanian Way

Branden, N. (1995). The Six Pillars of Self-Esteem. Bantam.

Harris, R. (2011). The Confidence Gap: A Guide to Overcoming Fear and Self-Doubt. Shambhala Publications.

McKay, M., & Fanning, P. (2000). Self-Esteem: A Proven Program of Cognitive Techniques for Assessing, Improving, and Maintaining Your Self-Esteem. New Harbinger Publications.

Neff, K. D. (2011). Self-Compassion: Stop Beating Yourself Up and Leave Insecurity Behind. HarperCollins.

In his book Enneagram Transformations, Don Riso suggests a series of Transformative Psychological Affirmations and that we might want to reflect on, as well as modify so that they land better with our own psyche and then read them aloud (maybe even on a daily basis).

Here are his suggestions for using the Transformations:

“People have found a variety of ways to incorporate these Transformations in their lives. Some have found it helpful to read them in the morning as part of their daily prayer or meditation, while others have found it useful to read them at night before going to sleep. Whenever you choose to read them, try to find a time when you will not be distracted and are receptive to what they evoke in you.

It is helpful to read the Transformations aloud, as this is an effective way of reprogramming your subconscious. With repetition, you will find that you may have memorized some of the Transformations and that they will spontaneously occur to you. You may want to hold an Affirmation or a Release in mind during stressful moments by repeating it several times in the manner of a prayer or mantra to shift your attention to something positive and helpful.”

THE TRANSFORMATIONS (listed by Enneagram Type)

PERSONALITY TYPE ONE: The Rational, Idealistic Type

ONES TRY TO ESCAPE from their fear of being condemned by striving to be perfect. They see themselves as fair, reasonable, and objective, although others may see them as rigid, dogmatic, and overly critical. Ones believe that if they discipline themselves sufficiently, they can avoid making mistakes. Being human, however, they do make mistakes—obliging them to struggle ever harder to organize and improve everything in their lives. If they see that others do not share their idealism, Ones increasingly become unable to control their anger about having to do everything themselves. If Ones continue pushing themselves toward “perfection,” the repressed parts of their psyches explode, leaving them enraged and irrational.

ONES CAN ESCAPE THEIR EGO CAGE by acknowledging and releasing their unrealistic expectations of themselves and others. They begin to understand that the standards by which they judge the world are not absolute truths. As Ones recognize the subjective quality of many of their positions, they begin to respect the beliefs and values of others. Without the constraints of perfectionism, their vision opens to a reality more mysterious and more perfect than they could ever have conceived.

Transformations for PERSONALITY TYPE ONE

  I NOW RELEASE
holding myself and others
to impossible standards.

  I NOW RELEASE
my fear of losing control
and becoming irrational.

  I NOW RELEASE
my fear of being condemned
for being wrong.

  I NOW RELEASE
refusing to see my own
contradictions.

  I NOW RELEASE
rationalizing my own behavior.

  I NOW RELEASE
obsessing about things I
cannot change.

  I NOW RELEASE
all bitterness and disappointment
with the world.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling that other people’s beliefs
and values threaten mine.

  I NOW RELEASE
believing that I am in a position
to judge others.

  I NOW RELEASE
driving myself and others
to be perfect.

  I NOW RELEASE
ignoring my own emotional
and physical distress.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling angry, impatient,
and easily annoyed.

  I NOW RELEASE
fearing and disowning my body
and my feelings.

  I NOW RELEASE
allowing my desire for order and
efficiency to control my life.

  I NOW RELEASE
automatically focusing on
what is wrong with things.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling that it is up to me
to fix everything.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I can allow myself to relax
and enjoy life.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that the best I can do
is good enough.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am grateful that others
have many things to teach me.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I can make mistakes without
condemning myself.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that my feelings are legitimate and
that I have a right to feel them.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I treat others with
tenderness and respect.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am gentle and forgiving
of myself.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am compassionate
and forgiving of others.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that life is good and unfolding
in miraculous ways.

PERSONALITY TYPE TWO: The Caring, Nurturing Type

TWOS TRY TO ESCAPE their fear of being unloved by constantly doing things for others. They see themselves as thoughtful, well-meaning, and generous, although others may sometimes see them as intrusive and self-deceptive. To get others to love them, Twos believe that they must always be selfless and virtuous, so they sacrifice their own needs and desires for the good of others. If others still do not give Twos the love they want, their disappointment and anger must also be denied and repressed. Thus, Twos become caught between feeling love and feeling rage. Over time, suppressing their negative feelings takes its toll on their health and relationships and they might lash out at the very people whose love they so desperately want.

TWOS CAN ESCAPE THEIR EGO CAGE by acknowledging and releasing their ulterior motives and negative feelings toward others. The more honest they are about themselves, the more emotionally balanced they become. By recognizing and accepting all the different parts of themselves, even the negative ones, Twos undo the contradictions that have blocked them from being close to others. They can then become the genuinely loving, nurturing people they have always wanted to be. Their goodness is so real and selfless that they cannot help but attract others who love them deeply.

Transformations for PERSONALITY TYPE TWO

  I NOW RELEASE
all feelings of rage and resentment
toward others.

  I NOW RELEASE
all attempts to justify
my aggressive feelings.

  I NOW RELEASE
all attachment to feeling
victimized and abused.

  I NOW RELEASE
the fear that I am unwanted
and unloved.

  I NOW RELEASE
all attempts to force
others to love me.

  I NOW RELEASE
making others feel guilty for not
responding sufficiently to my needs.

  I NOW RELEASE
abusing food and medications to
make up for my loneliness.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling that others owe me for the
things I have chosen to do for them.

  I NOW RELEASE
believing that no one willingly
takes care of me.

  I NOW RELEASE
expecting others to repay my help
in the way I want.

  I NOW RELEASE
all physical ailments, aches,
and complaints.

  I NOW RELEASE
calling attention to what I
have done for others.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling possessive of loved ones.

  I NOW RELEASE
doing things for others
to make myself needed.

  I NOW RELEASE
flattering others to make them
feel good about me.

  I NOW RELEASE
not wanting to acknowledge
my negative feelings.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I own all of my feelings
without fear.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am clear and conscious of
my motives.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am lovable for
who I am.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that my happiness does not depend
on pleasing others.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I can let go of loved ones.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I nurture my own growth
and development.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I love others without
expecting anything in return.

  I NOW AFFIRM
the joy and warmth that
fills my heart.

  I NOW AFFIRM
my gratitude for all that
others have given me.

PERSONALITY TYPE THREE: The Success-Oriented, Pragmatic Type

THREES TRY TO ESCAPE from their fear of being rejected by seeking the affirmation of others through personal excellence. They see themselves as competent and worthwhile, although to others, they may seem attention-seeking and arrogant. If Threes sense that others are not responding to them, they begin to project an image that they believe will be more desirable. Thus, Threes disown their true self piece by piece and invest their energy in the roles they play until they lose touch with their feelings and any sense of who they really are. Terrified that someone will see through their facade to the growing emptiness inside, they may betray themselves and others to save their image.

THREES CAN ESCAPE THEIR EGO CAGE by acknowledging and releasing their desire for attention and admiration. They see that their ceaseless search for applause alienates them from themselves and leads them away from deeper values. As they dare to give up their masks, they discover that they are not empty; they have many long-buried feelings and selfless impulses. And, by pursuing values and relationships that truly nourish their spirit, they discover that the authentic self they have so long concealed is more admirable than any image they could project.

Transformations for PERSONALITY TYPE THREE

  I NOW RELEASE
being obsessed by my hostile
feelings toward others.

  I NOW RELEASE
believing that sabotaging others
will make things better for me.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling jealous of others and
their good fortune.

  I NOW RELEASE
my fear of failing and
being humiliated.

  I NOW RELEASE
fearing that I am inadequate
and will be rejected.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling that I must conceal
my mistakes and limitations.

  I NOW RELEASE
closing down my feelings
in order to function.

  I NOW RELEASE
betraying my own integrity to get
the admiration of others.

  I NOW RELEASE
attempting to misrepresent myself
and my abilities.

  I NOW RELEASE
the grandiose expectations
I have of myself.

  I NOW RELEASE
craving constant attention
and affirmation.

  I NOW RELEASE
using arrogance to compensate
for my own insecurity.

  I NOW RELEASE
desiring to impress others
with my performance.

  I NOW RELEASE
concealing myself behind masks.

  I NOW RELEASE
comparing myself with others.

  I NOW RELEASE
driving myself relentlessly
to be the best.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I have value regardless
of my achievements.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am centered and
emotionally available.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am caring
and have a good heart.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I take in the love
others give me.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am responsible to those
who look up to me.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am happy to work
for the good of others.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I develop my true talents by
accepting who I am.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I delight in the accomplishments
and successes of others.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I can reveal my real self
without being afraid.

PERSONALITY TYPE FOUR: The Sensitive, Withdrawn Type

FOURS TRY TO ESCAPE from their fear of being flawed and defective by throwing themselves into their feelings. They see themselves as sensitive and intuitive, while others may see them as overly touchy and too ruled by their feelings. Fours believe that they will find a solution to their emotional turmoil by endlessly replaying their problems in their imaginations. As they go around and around, they stir up powerful emotional crosscurrents that draw them further inward until they lose all perspective on themselves, undermining their ability to deal effectively with life. In time, their emotional conflicts and difficulties might fan the flames of their self-doubt and self-hatred, and they withdraw into a darkening world of torment and despair.

  FOURS CAN ESCAPE THEIR EGO CAGE by acknowledging and releasing their strong attachments to their feelings. As they do so, Fours learn that their feelings do not die, as they had feared, but that other capacities and talents become available and can be acted on. The more they interact with reality, the richer their emotional life becomes. No longer the prisoners of every shifting mood, they find that their practical accomplishments grow. Fours thus discover that they are not only intuitive and creative, but also capable and strong.

Transformations for PERSONALITY TYPE FOUR

  I NOW RELEASE
turning my anger and aggressions
against myself.

  I NOW RELEASE
all self-hatred and self-contempt.

  I NOW RELEASE
all feelings of hopelessness
and despair.

  I NOW RELEASE
all self-sabotaging thoughts
and actions.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling that I am inadequate
and defective.

  I NOW RELEASE
the fear that I am unimportant
and undesirable.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling shameful and misunderstood
by others.

  I NOW RELEASE
being distraught, fatigued,
and inhibited.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling that people always
let me down.

  I NOW RELEASE
all unrealistic expectations
of myself and others.

  I NOW RELEASE
all claims of needing to be
treated differently.

  I NOW RELEASE
all self-indulgence in my
emotions and behavior.

  I NOW RELEASE
all self-doubt and emotional
vulnerability.

  I NOW RELEASE
wanting to protect myself by
withdrawing from others.

  I NOW RELEASE
all wasteful fantasies and
romantic longings.

  I NOW RELEASE
dwelling on the past
to prolong my feelings.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am not defined
by my feelings.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that only the feelings I act on
express who I am.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I open myself up to people
and the world.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I use all of my
experiences to grow.

  I NOW AFFIRM
the goodness of my life,
my friends, and myself.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I love myself and
treat myself gently.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am free of the damage
of my past.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am transforming my life
into something higher.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am bringing something good
and beautiful into the world.

PERSONALITY TYPE FIVE: The Intellectual, Analytic Type

FIVES TRY TO ESCAPE from their fear of being overwhelmed and powerless by focusing on specific areas of life which they feel they can master. They see themselves as intelligent and profound, although others may see them as too intense and strangely detached. As Fives become convinced that they cannot cope with people or with practical life, they retreat into private mental worlds. They seek sanctuary in their minds while watching the outside world with growing anxiety. Eventually, their fears taint their thoughts so much that Fives feel they must cut off their connections with the world to protect themselves from their terrors. With nothing to hold on to or believe in, they might ultimately shrink away into a self-created prison of isolation and hopelessness.

  FIVES CAN ESCAPE THEIR EGO CAGE by acknowledging and releasing their fears of being powerless and overwhelmed by the outside world. By disengaging from their overheated mental associations, Fives discover that in the present moment, they can indeed be safe and at ease in the environment. They begin to focus on those things that support them rather than threaten them. As they leave their shell, Fives realize not only that there is a place for them in the world, but that they are capable of enjoying and mastering life.

Transformations for PERSONALITY TYPE FIVE

  I NOW RELEASE
all fearfulness of the world
around me.

  I NOW RELEASE
all feelings of powerlessness
and hopelessness.

  I NOW RELEASE
my fear of being violated
or overwhelmed by others.

  I NOW RELEASE
my dark and destructive fantasies.

  I NOW RELEASE
isolating myself by
rejecting others.

  I NOW RELEASE
believing that no one can
be depended on.

  I NOW RELEASE
desiring to antagonize others
and ruin their peace of mind.

  I NOW RELEASE
being cynical and contemptuous of the
normalcy of others.

  I NOW RELEASE
fearing that others will
exploit me.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling that I am a
misfit in life.

  I NOW RELEASE
being secretive and hiding
from people.

  I NOW RELEASE
postponing my emotional needs.

  I NOW RELEASE
neglecting my physical health
and appearance.

  I NOW RELEASE
the agitation and restlessness
of my mind.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling that I always need to know
more before I do anything.

  I NOW RELEASE
avoiding my life by escaping
into my mind.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am secure and grounded in
the reality of my own life.

  I NOW AFFIRM
the strength and wonder
of my body.

  I NOW AFFIRM
the value of my inventiveness
and sense of humor.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I accept uncertainty
and ambiguity.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that my life and struggles are
meaningful and rewarding.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I have faith in the future
and in human beings.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I reach out to others
confidently as an equal.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I find serenity in being
compassionate toward others.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I support others from the
fullness of my heart.

PERSONALITY TYPE SIX: The Committed, Traditionalistic Type

SIXES TRY TO ESCAPE from their fear of being abandoned by allying themselves with others. They see themselves as trustworthy and reliable, although others may see them as defensive and insecure. They want to feel that they belong somewhere, so they look to others to provide security and show them what to do. The problem is that Sixes are also anxious about depending on others. They are thus caught between needing the security of an authority and wanting to prove their independence. Sixes may try to solve their anxiety with outbursts of misdirected aggression against those around them. When their outbursts drive away supporters and protectors, Sixes might become all the more anxious and depressed.

SIXES CAN ESCAPE THEIR EGO CAGE by acknowledging and releasing their feelings of dependency. By learning to centre themselves and trust their own capacities, they find a stable place within themselves. They learn that they can believe in themselves, and that they do not need to depend on others to “save” them. They stop relinquishing their authority to others and take constructive actions for their own welfare. When Sixes dare to pursue their own values and beliefs, they begin to discover the real courage and security they have always sought.

Transformations for PERSONALITY TYPE SIX

  I NOW RELEASE
my fear of being abandoned
and alone.

  I NOW RELEASE
my self-defeating, self-punishing
tendencies.

  I NOW RELEASE
all feelings of dread
about the future.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling persecuted, trapped,
and desperate.

  I NOW RELEASE
overreacting and exaggerating
my problems.

  I NOW RELEASE
taking out my fears and
anxieties on others.

  I NOW RELEASE
being suspicious of others and
thinking the worst of them.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling inferior and incapable
of functioning on my own.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling cowardly and unsure
of myself.

  I NOW RELEASE
acting “tough” to disguise
my insecurities.

  I NOW RELEASE
my fear and dislike of those who
are different from me.

  I NOW RELEASE
blaming others for my own
problems and mistakes.

  I NOW RELEASE
being evasive and defensive
with those who need me.

  I NOW RELEASE
my tendency to be negative
and complaining.

  I NOW RELEASE
my fear of taking responsibility
for my mistakes.

  I NOW RELEASE
looking to others to make me
feel secure.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am independent
and capable.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I can keep my own identity
in groups and in relationships.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I have faith in myself,
my talents, and my future.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I meet difficulties
with calmness and confidence.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am secure and able to make
the best of whatever comes my way.

  I NOW AFFIRM
the kinship I have with every
human being.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am understanding and generous
to all who need me.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I act courageously in
all circumstances.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I find true authority
within me.

PERSONALITY TYPE SEVEN: The Hyperactive, Uninhibited Type

SEVENS TRY TO ESCAPE from their fear of being deprived by immersing themselves in constant activity. They see themselves as practical and fun-loving, although others may see them as superficial and infantile. Sevens fear that if they run out of stimulation—of things to have and do—something terrible will happen, so they stay busy and on the go. They spread themselves too thin, however, using up their resources, while constantly distracting themselves with even more experiences. Eventually, the strain causes their health and emotional stability to collapse, and Sevens are left exhausted and in panic.

SEVENS CAN ESCAPE THEIR EGO CAGE by acknowledging and releasing their attachment to being stimulated all the time. When they slow down, they discover that many of their activities do not actually satisfy them. And, as they let go of their feeling that they must be constantly having new experiences, they learn to stay with each experience long enough to assimilate it. Sevens finally realize that no experience or thing in the external world can ultimately keep them satisfied or free from anxiety, but if they search within themselves, they will find a stillness and serenity which is a dependable source of undiminished joy.

Transformations for PERSONALITY TYPE SEVEN

  I NOW RELEASE
all reckless and destructive
impulses.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling that I will be
overwhelmed by anxiety.

  I NOW RELEASE
all compulsions and addictions.

  I NOW RELEASE
burning myself out by trying to
satisfy all of my desires.

  I NOW RELEASE
running away from the consequences
of my actions.

  I NOW RELEASE
insulting or abusing others
to vent my frustrations.

  I NOW RELEASE
allowing my insecurities to drive me
into dangerous situations and behavior.

  I NOW RELEASE
sacrificing my health and happiness
for instant gratification.

  I NOW RELEASE
being demanding and impatient
with others.

  I NOW RELEASE
fearing that there will not be
enough for me.

  I NOW RELEASE
always feeling that I need more.

  I NOW RELEASE
wanting every moment to be
exciting and dramatic.

  I NOW RELEASE
escaping from myself through
distractions and constant activity.

  I NOW RELEASE
letting my lack of self-discipline
ruin my opportunities.

  I NOW RELEASE
overextending myself with more
than I can do well.

  I NOW RELEASE
believing that external things
will make me happy.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am happiest when I am
calm and centered.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I can say no to myself
without feeling deprived.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that there will be enough for me
of whatever I need.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am resilient in the face
of setbacks.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I find satisfaction in
ordinary things.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I stay with projects until
I complete them.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I care deeply about people and
am committed to their happiness.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that there is a spiritual dimension
to my life.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am profoundly grateful
to be alive.

PERSONALITY TYPE EIGHT: The Powerful, Dominating Type

EIGHTS TRY TO ESCAPE from their fear of being in the power or control of others by maintaining a stance of strength and toughness. They see themselves as strong and independent, although others may see them as belligerent and dictatorial. In their effort to suppress their fear and vulnerability, Eights begin to see all relationships as power struggles and all intimacy as weakness. They steel themselves against depending on others, and seek more power so that no one can take advantage of them. If they continue hardening themselves, they eventually lose the capacity to feel anything for others—love, trust, or pity. Eights ultimately become abusive to get their way and remain in control, causing everyone who has been abused by them to turn against them.

EIGHTS CAN ESCAPE THEIR EGO CAGE by acknowledging and releasing their fear of intimacy. As they do so, they begin to drop their guard and discover that real love and friendship will not threaten them. They find that the more they trust and care for others, the more others willingly support them and help them attain their goals. By allowing others to be close to them, Eights are able to create a world of cooperation and mutual fulfilment rather than one of conflict and mutual destruction.

Transformations for PERSONALITY TYPE EIGHT

  I NOW RELEASE
all anger, rage, and violence
from my life.

  I NOW RELEASE
dehumanizing myself by violating
others in any way.

  I NOW RELEASE
being verbally or physically abusive.

  I NOW RELEASE
believing that taking vengeance will
free me from my own pain.

  I NOW RELEASE
hardening my heart
against suffering.

  I NOW RELEASE
my fear of ever being vulnerable
or weak.

  I NOW RELEASE
believing that I do not
need others.

  I NOW RELEASE
believing that I must bully
people to get my way.

  I NOW RELEASE
my fear that others will
control me.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling that I must only
look after myself.

  I NOW RELEASE
my fear of losing to anyone.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling that I must
never be afraid.

  I NOW RELEASE
attempting to control everything
in my life.

  I NOW RELEASE
allowing my pride and ego to ruin
my health and relationships.

  I NOW RELEASE
thinking that anyone who does not
agree with me is against me.

  I NOW RELEASE
being hard-boiled and denying
my need for affection.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I believe in people and care
about their welfare.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am big-hearted and let
others share the glory.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am honorable and therefore
worthy of respect.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am most fulfilled by
championing others.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I have tender feelings
and good impulses.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I can be gentle without
being afraid.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I master myself and my own
passions.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that there is an authority greater
than me.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I love others and ask for
their love in return.

PERSONALITY TYPE NINE: The Easygoing, Phlegmatic Type

NINES TRY TO ESCAPE their fear of separation by creating an “environment” that will nurture them. They see themselves as undemanding, uncomplicated people, although others may feel that they are complacent and neglectful. Nines believe that everything should always be peaceful and harmonious. They begin to create problems, however, because they refuse to look at anything that contradicts their idealized world view, hoping for the best while ignoring difficulties until others are forced to solve them. Eventually, others become frustrated and angry with them, causing Nines to retreat into a psychic inner sanctum where nothing can touch or hurt them. They might eventually turn their backs on reality and drift into a state of apathy and helplessness.

NINES CAN ESCAPE THEIR EGO CAGE by acknowledging and releasing their idealizations of the world and others. As they do so, Nines see their loved ones more objectively and realize that others’ lives are not inherently more important than their own. This frees Nines to see their own value and gives them the energy to become actively engaged with life. By investing in their own development, and participating fully in their world, Nines find the contentment they have always sought.

Transformations for PERSONALITY TYPE NINE

  I NOW RELEASE
not taking an active interest
in my own life.

  I NOW RELEASE
turning away from whatever is
unpleasant or difficult.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling that there is nothing I can
do to improve my life.

  I NOW RELEASE
being numb and emotionally
unavailable.

  I NOW RELEASE
refusing to see my
own aggressions.

  I NOW RELEASE
ignoring problems until they
become overwhelming.

  I NOW RELEASE
all dependency and fear of being
on my own.

  I NOW RELEASE
all wishful thinking and giving up
too soon.

  I NOW RELEASE
neglecting myself and my own
legitimate needs.

  I NOW RELEASE
seeking quick, easy “solutions”
to my problems.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling threatened by significant
changes in my life.

  I NOW RELEASE
losing myself in comforting habits
and routines.

  I NOW RELEASE
feeling that most things are just
too much trouble.

  I NOW RELEASE
all inattentiveness and
forgetfulness.

  I NOW RELEASE
going along with others
to keep the peace.

  I NOW RELEASE
living through others and not
developing myself.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am confident, strong,
and independent.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I develop my mind and
think things through.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am awake and alert to
the world around me.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am proud of myself
and my abilities.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am steadfast and dependable
in difficult times.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I look deeply into myself
without fear.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am excited about
my future.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I am a powerful, healing
force in my world.

  I NOW AFFIRM
that I actively embrace all
that life brings.

Lacanian theory, previously confined to academic discourse, is now gaining recognition as a powerful framework for self-understanding and personal growth. Jacques Lacan, a controversial French psychoanalyst, explored the intricate intersections of philosophy, psychoanalysis, and literature through his layered and complex writings. However, when it comes to unraveling the complexities of the human psyche, his conceptualization of The Real, The Symbolic, and The Imaginary—known as the three orders—provides valuable insights for self-development and the alleviation of suffering.

The orders are not separate entities. Rather, they’re interconnected dimensions of our conscious and unconscious lives. Lacan’s triad can be an incredibly liberating toolset to frame our daily experiences, offering fresh, insightful angles into our inner and outer worlds.

Let’s delve a little deeper, bearing in mind that the beauty of Lacanian theory lies not in its authoritative dictations, but in its inherent flexibility, its invitation to personal interpretations and meanings.

THE IMAGINARY: REFLECTIONS ON SELF AND OTHER

The Imaginary Order is the ego’s territory, luring us with deceptive illusions and false promises. It’s the place where we construct idealized versions of ourselves and others, fabricating narratives to satisfy our desires and define our identities. Here, we engage in a relentless battle between the ‘I’ and the ‘Other,’ often staging a dramatic confrontation.

However, we need to be alert to the mirages this realm may project. For instance, we might start the day imagining that all our social interactions will be havens of compassionate and kind connection. But in doing so, we may risk becoming a slave to an idealized image of human connection, causing distress when reality falls short.

Here are some reflections for The Imaginary order which might be worth thinking about as we begin a new day:

1. What desires and dreams do I have for today?
2. Are there any desires or dreams I have today that may be unrealistic or based on illusionary notions? How can I approach them with a balanced perspective?
3. How might my self-image positively or negatively influence my experiences today?
4. How can I ensure my actions today reflect who I truly am, not just an idealized image of myself?
5. How can I let go of concerns about how others perceive my actions today and instead focus on acting in alignment with my values and intentions?
6. How do I imagine others will perceive my actions today?
7. What steps can I take to manage my expectations of others, allowing space for their different perspectives and actions?
8. How can I remain open to new information and adjust my perceptions of others based on their actions and intentions, rather than relying solely on my imagined perceptions?
9. What actions can I take today to bridge the gap between who I am and the idealized image I may hold of myself? How can I embrace my authentic self more fully?
10. How can I cultivate self-compassion and acceptance, recognizing that my worth is not solely determined by the attainment of an idealized self-image?

THE REAL: CONFRONTING THE CHAOS

The Real is what resists symbolization. It is the abyss, the chaos, the unutterable and unformulated, raw, and often overwhelming reality of existing as a self-conscious, hyper-social, language-using primate. The Real encompasses those experiences that leave us speechless, awestruck, or even terrified. It’s the stark reminder that there are parts of existence we cannot control, predict, or fully comprehend.

The Real, while often associated with trauma and anxiety, also holds the potential for profound understanding and enlightenment. Throughout history, Zen monks, therapists, philosophers, spiritual teachers, mentors, coaches, artists, writers, scientists, and researchers have played pivotal roles in pushing all of us into a direct confrontation with reality.

Consider the Zen monks of old like Master Linji Yixuan who employed a confrontational teaching style, utilizing physical gestures and striking blows to jolt his students out of their fantasies and into the present moment. These approaches aimed to awaken disciples to the true nature of existence, beyond intellectual understanding.

Similarly, therapists also sometimes employ strategies to help individuals confront the real and foster personal growth through techniques like role-playing and empty-chair dialogues, or by gradually exposing clients to the realities they fear or avoid.

In both practices the aim is to facilitate personal growth and enlightenment by guiding individuals toward a direct, honest, and unfiltered experience of reality.

Reflections for The Real:

1. What uncontrollable factors will I face today, and how can I prepare for them?
2. Are there any uncomfortable truths or realities about myself that I need to confront or address today?
3. Are there any situations today where I might encounter the gap between reality and my perceptions or expectations?
4. How can I respect and acknowledge the reality of others’ experiences today?
5. How can I cultivate gratitude for the simple realities and ordinary moments of today?
6. What aspects of my reality today require acceptance rather than resistance or denial?
7. What boundaries or limits do I need to set to maintain a healthy relationship with the demands of reality?
8. Are there parts of today that feel overwhelming or chaotic?
9. How can I stay present and in touch with the reality of each moment today?
10. How can I find meaning and purpose in the mundane or seemingly insignificant aspects of my day?

THE SYMBOLIC: NAVIGATING THE SOCIAL MATRIX

The Symbolic Order is the societal script. It’s the realm of language, laws, culture, and norms. Our roles as parents, children, employees, or citizens are choreographed in the Symbolic. The danger here lies in becoming a mere player, losing our individuality within the labyrinth of societal expectations.

To engage with the Symbolic, we need to examine how we communicate, interpret, and co-create our social reality. It invites us to question, challenge, or conform to societal norms, balancing our desires with the expectations of our social roles.

Reflections for The Symbolic:

1. What societal expectations or norms am I grappling with today?
2. How do my tasks today relate to my roles within various societal systems (e.g., family, work, community)?
3. Are there any narratives or societal scripts that I’m expected to follow today?
4. How can I balance the influence of societal symbols and expectations with my own values and beliefs?
5. How can I use language and symbols to better understand and express my experiences today?
6. What symbolic rituals or traditions can I engage in today to deepen my connection with my culture or community?
7. Are there any assumptions or stereotypes associated with certain symbols or labels that I should challenge or question?
8. How can I use creativity and imagination to reinterpret and redefine the symbols and narratives that shape my experiences?
9. What alternative perspectives or marginalized voices can I seek out to broaden my understanding of the symbolic systems I engage with?
10. Are there any power dynamics or inequalities embedded within the symbolic structures I encounter today, and how can I address them?

Lacan invites us to consider these three orders as lenses through which we perceive and interpret the world. We might recognise that there is an inherent power in questioning our selves in this way, a drive towards autonomy.

By contemplating the dynamics of The Real, The Imaginary, and The Symbolic, Lacan invites us to delve into the depths of our psyche. Through this exploration, we gain the tools to construct our own unique roadmap for navigating the day, transcending the hidden recesses of our consciousness.

These checklists will help you identify your emotional, psychological, and physical symptoms of trauma.

Physical Symptoms

On the list below, check any of the physical symptoms that you have experienced that are not better explained by another illness or condition. Be curious with yourself. You are simply expanding your awareness of yourself and your physical responses. Your body has worked hard to keep you safe, so do not judge yourself. Merely be appreciative and know that recognizing these is the first step to finding some relief.

• Irritable bowel syndrome
• Constipation
• Diarrhea
• Migraines and/or frequent headaches
• Autoimmune disorders (e.g., Hashimoto’s disease, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis)
• Frequent back and/or joint pain
• Frequent muscle tension
• Frequent bouts of shivering and/or shaking
• Bouts of energy and/or feeling an adrenaline rush that seems out of context
• Lethargy, struggling to get motivated, or lack of energy to complete things that need to be done
• Feeling jittery or easily startled
• Nightmares and/or night terrors
• Somatic pain (e.g., vaginal discomfort that is triggered by a memory of past sexual abuse)
• Bed-wetting or wetting or soiling oneself with urination and/or feces
• Being triggered by certain smells, sights, images, sensations, noises, and/or sounds

Take a moment and reflect on any questions, insight, or awareness that this checklist brought to mind.

Emotional and Cognitive Symptoms

As a result of the trauma you endured, you may frequently judge or question yourself, your thoughts, and your feelings. Or perhaps you feel frustration or confusion over why you respond so strongly to some of the things that you do. You may question why you struggle with bouts of anger, depression, and hopelessness, or replay certain thoughts in your mind. These are all normal experiences when dealing with trauma. You may also experience cognitive symptoms, which pertain to how you perceive, think about, remember, and understand things. Check any current emotional or cognitive symptoms you may be experiencing.

• Checking out of the present moment and frequently fantasizing or daydreaming
• Forgetting or being unable to recall small chunks of time (e.g., frequently spacing out during conversations or not remembering the drive to work)
• Acting as if on autopilot
• Having difficulty relaxing
• Feeling emotionally numb and/or struggling to feel a range of emotions
• Feeling overwhelmed or anxious in social settings or large crowds
• Lacking patience
• Being forgetful
• Being easily distracted, having poor focus, and/or frequently being inattentive</li >
• Difficulty sitting still or waiting your turn, or frequently interrupting others
• Lack of hobbies or interests
• Angry outbursts that seem out of character or out of place
• Disturbing memories of past traumatic events
• Flashbacks (feeling as if you are reliving the actual event that occurred)
• Obsessive-compulsive tendencies (e.g., wanting things in a particular order, wanting set schedules, having rigid expectations or routines)
• Appearing or feeling overly nervous or anxious
• Persistent negative thoughts or beliefs about yourself
• Low self-esteem
• Lack of a positive identity or regard for yourself
• Difficulty regulating or controlling emotions or being overly controlled by emotions
• Tendency to only show emotions that are expected or neutral

Take a moment and reflect on any questions, insight, or awareness that this checklist brought to mind.

Behavioral Symptoms

Another aspect of survival that you no doubt engage in are your behavioral responses. These are your coping skills. We all have responses to cope with our feelings and emotions and have all found ways that provide us relief. Some of these may be healthy coping skills, such as meditating, journaling, taking a time-out from stressful situations, whereas others may be numbing out with alcohol, substances, or overeating. Some of these responses may have been developed during the time of our traumatic experiences. These were the behaviors, habits, or other means in which we were able to hold on and survive during our pain. Although some of these responses may have served us well, some may be blocking us from progressing or healing our pain. As you consider the list below, take into consideration the behaviors, habits, or patterns you have noticed or engaged in.

• Isolation, spending a lot of time alone
• Disordered eating (overeating, binge eating, not eating enough, hoarding food)
• Hoarding belongings or struggling to let go of unnecessary personal belongings
• Hypersexuality
• Avoiding sexual interactions or urges even when in a committed relationship/marriage
• Addiction (eating disorders, alcoholism, drugs, gambling, sex, exercise, shopping, spending)
• History of rebellious behavior (sneaking out, running away, stealing, lying, fighting)
• Behavioral outbursts and/or extreme difficulty conforming to authority or perceived control

Take a moment and reflect on any questions, insight, or awareness that this checklist brought to mind.

Relationship/Interpersonal Symptoms

Another aspect of symptoms that we should consider is related to our relationship with others. Even when traumatic events have nothing to do with relationships (e.g., in the case of natural disasters, accidents, and so on), trauma often impacts our ability to trust and feel safe with others. We may have a desire for closeness, love, and connection but struggle to allow ourselves to be close or feel fully safe with others. It is also easy for others to misunderstand us and our behavioral responses. The more that you come to understand your reactions, responses, and feelings, the more likely you

will be to have healthier relationships with others in your life. Identify the symptoms that you can relate to or have experienced below.

• Attachment issues, develop close/quick relationships with little to no boundaries
• Avoid attachment/closeness to others
• Sabotage close/healthy relationships when beginning to feel vulnerable
• Poor boundaries with others (e.g., have no filter, overshare personal information, overly trust others)
• Rigid/Strict boundaries (e.g., closed-off with emotions, can come across as controlling or uptight)
• Tendency to be the “rescuer,” caretaker, or fixer in close relationships
• Overly independent and avoid depending on or being close to others
• History of being in abusive or unstable relationships
• Struggle making personal needs known in close relationships, avoid asking for help or dismiss your own personal needs
• Struggle to identify or understand what your own personal needs even are

Take a moment and reflect on any questions, insight, or awareness that this checklist brought to mind.

I want you to take a moment and allow yourself to experience whatever emotions that you may be feeling as you have completed the above inventories. Whatever emotions you may be feeling are valid. Recognizing your symptoms takes a lot of courage. It is difficult to face some of these things and yet you have done it. You are looking within and doing some hard work at acknowledging the pain. Remember that you are resilient. You are capable of healing even more than you think or can imagine.

According to Denis De Rougement in his book “Love in the Western World” the wanting and yearning of passionate love is often characterized by an unattainable ideal, a longing that cannot be fulfilled. This is embodied in the troubadours’ tales of knights pining for married ladies, their love doomed by social constructs. De Rougement argues that this tradition of unfulfilled or impossible love permeates Western culture, leading to our contemporary obsession with heartbreak, unrequited love, and tragic romance.

Yearning is not something we do for the person who is gone but for the intense emotions and the romantic ideal that their presence represented, which is then characterized by desire and longing, often more for the idea of love itself than for the actual individual. Our pain, longing, and suffering are seen as proofs of authenticity and depth of feeling.

As Novalis points out, “The lover is alone with all that they love.” This passionate love, far from being the fuller life it seems to promise, often proves to be a form of intense deprivation, an obsession with a singular image to the exclusion of all else. To the impassioned lover, the world dissolves and there remains only the beloved. This is the ecstasy of love, an inward flight from all created things, leading to a profound sense of isolation.

Stendhal provides the causal psychology of this in his idea of “crystallization,” a process where the mind continually uncovers new perfections in the beloved, often endowing them with attributes they may not truly possess. This process idealizes the concept of love, propelling it into the realm of fantasy, which is perhaps its legitimate abode.

“At the salt mines of Salzburg, they throw a leafless wintry bough into one of the abandoned workings. Two or three months later they haul it out covered with a shining deposit of crystals. The smallest twig, no bigger than a tom-tit’s claw, is studded with a galaxy of scintillating diamonds. The original branch is no longer recognizable.”

Stendhal alludes to four kinds of love in his writing: passion-love, sympathy-love, sensual love, and vanity-love. To love in the sense of passion-love, which is where this crystallization occurs (Rougement warns us, “is the contrary of [the verb] to live. It is an impoverishment of one’s being, an askesis (which is to say: a practice) without sequel, an inability to enjoy the present without imagining it as absent, a never-ending flight from possession.” Passion, he goes on to delineate is “by no means the fuller life which it seems to be in the dreams of adolescence, but is on the contrary a kind of naked and denuding intensity, verily, a bitter destitution, the impoverishment of a mind being emptied of all diversity, an obsession of the imagination by a single image.”

The gratification of desire does not satisfy the passion, Stendhal acknowledges. The beloved, once possessed, might lose the allure they once held as the embodiment of all that is eternally elusive, which incites pursuit and evokes an intensity of desire more delightful than possession itself. Thus, the satisfaction of desire can make the beloved seem less attractive. For this reason, the lovers might prefer to retreat from the beloved rather than face the reality of shared existence.

Plato in Phaedrus cast love as ‘an enthusiasm,’ which translates more or less as ‘being ‘possessed by a god’. De Rougement removes God from the equation and calls it a kind of allergy, a relentless condition that causes restlessness, longing, and the chronic yearning for what we can’t have.

Wanting then is a kind of metaphysical itch that cannot be scratched, a divine possession that fills us with overwhelming fervour and passion, but for no purpose. It is rather, and I have perhaps experienced it as such, a divine delirium.

Our hearts ache for the idealized, unattainable love, the platonic perfection we have projected onto the beloved. Our yearning, while potentially causing pain and heartbreak, provides a profound emotional intensity that the ego, the self, interprets as the truest form of desire.

Even though we all know how the “trick” is carried out, it is often like watching Penn and Teller doing the that classic cup and balls switcheroo, but using plastic cups so that we can see exactly the sleight of hand being carried out, and yet we are still fooled. We see it all happening before our eyes, but our eyes and even more importantly, that desiring organ within us which we refer to as our hearts, cannot detach from the bewitchment and just focus on the mechanics of the illusion.

No surprise then that loss only amplifies this romantic allergy, intensifying our longing, and leaving us in a state of chronic wanting, forever reaching out for the divine, the perfect, the unattainable. In this state of yearning, we are both supremely alive in our desire and yet paradoxically in all sorts of pain from its unfulfillment.

Us moderns, men and women of passion and romance, expect irresistible love to produce some revelation either regarding ourselves or about life at large. This is a last vestige of mysticism we might say, even in its secular guise. Passion is the ne plus ultra experience, something that will alter our lives and enrich it with the unexpected, with thrilling chances, and an enjoyment ever more profound and gratifying. The whole deluded possibility opens before us of a future that assents to desire, with us having been “blessed” so as to enter into it, to rise to it, to reach it in transports.

Human philosophy, transmuted into theology and now psychotherapy would argue that we are free only when we have attained self-mastery, whereas the creature of passion seeks instead to be defeated, to lose all self-control, to be beside themselves and in ecstasy.

I don’t want a relationship where we experience conflict more than ever-so-occasionally, you once told me, and then proceeded to seek such a relationship by going back to the Hing Love Love Boutique where you were able to acquire a “keeper” from their Husband shelves. I thought conflict was how the dialectic of our being-together got worked out, ultimately for the better. I don’t believe in this idea anymore.

The myth of passionate love, as de Rougemont suggests, exerts a powerful hold over us, convincing us to view love as our fate, a force that consumes us in a “pure flame,” stronger and more real than happiness, society, or morality. However, this love is often, perhaps it was for us two, a twin narcissism, a love born from the standpoint of self, not the beloved.

Seen through this lens, chronic yearning for a lost love object is then ultimately a yearning for an idealized, unattainable love that, while potentially causing pain and heartbreak, also provides a sense of profound emotional intensity that we are most likely to interpret as the truest form of wanting, when it is rather a projection of our own desires and romantic ideals, an insatiable craving for the feelings and emotions the beloved once stirred within us. In this way, wanting conflates the individual with the experience of love itself, obscuring the distinction between the person and the emotions they evoke. In this sense, the yearning is not so much for the person as for an imagined state of absolute emotional fulfillment, an impossible ideal.

I like this bit from Mae Martin’s recent Netflix Special SAP:

I have a lot of feelings. I’m full to the absolute brim with feelings. I always visualize them like a Campbell’s cream of tomato soup can. And then I’m full to the brim. Right to the top of my skull, just trying to keep it contained. Just trying to keep it from sloshing out of my orifices as I make my way through life. That’s how I feel about my feelings.

I got a therapist recently. He’s really smart and we Zoom, and he said something interesting in a recent session: “Remember, you are not the feeling.” “Sure you feel consumed by the feeling, but you are not the feeling.”

He said, “Within you, and within everyone, there’s a very still, neutral, eternal self.” “And you experience the feelings, but you’re not consumed by them.” He said, “Rather than identifying so much with the feeling, like, ‘I’m anxious. I’m sad. I miss you.’” He said, “Don’t be consumed by the feeling.” “Just observe the feelings as they come, with curiosity.”

Have you heard that before? So I think you’re just supposed to be like, “Huh! I’m experiencing rage. I’m experiencing despair. I’m experiencing resentment.”

“How curious.”

“How curious.”

Tara Brach’s RAIN practice is a really helpful tool that combines aspects of mindfulness, cognitive behavioral therapy, and self-compassion to help manage and reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression.

WHAT IS IT?

I use it as a kind of inner MOT to check-in with myself when I’m feeling unhappy, or “lost” in some way. Many consider it to be the Swiss-Army knife of self-help strategies as it packs all of the following good stuff into just four quick reflections which can sometimes be carried out in a matter of minutes.

1. Emotional Regulation: RAIN promotes emotional regulation, helping us manage feelings of fear, anger, shame, or hopelessness. By Recognizing and Allowing these emotions, we aren’t fighting against them but instead acknowledging their presence. This acceptance often leads to a natural decrease in emotional intensity, enabling us to respond more effectively to emotional triggers.

2. Breaking Negative Thought Patterns: By Investigating our feelings and thought processes, we can identify recurring negative patterns that may be fueling our anxiety or depression. This process of internal exploration is like performing an inner “health check” or “maintenance inspection,” assessing the mental machinery that drives our emotions and behaviors. With this understanding, we can start to challenge and change these destructive patterns.

3. Enhancing Self-Compassion: The final step of the RAIN process, Nurture, fosters self-compassion. By consciously sending kindness and love to ourselves, we cultivate an inner ally rather than an inner critic. This self-compassion has been proven to improve psychological wellbeing and resilience, helping us to better cope with life’s challenges.

4. Reducing Rumination: The RAIN practice can help stop the cycle of rumination, a common symptom in both anxiety and depression. Rumination is when we’re stuck in a loop of thinking about distressing thoughts over and over. Through Recognizing and Allowing these thoughts, and then Investigating them with curiosity rather than judgment, we can interrupt this cycle and reduce our symptoms.

5. Promoting Mindfulness: RAIN practice strengthens our overall mindfulness, which is the skill of being fully present and engaged in the here and now. Mindfulness has been widely studied and found to have numerous mental health benefits, including stress reduction and improved focus, and can act as a buffer against the detrimental effects of anxiety and depression.

RAIN STEP-BY-STEP

Bring to mind a current situation in which you feel stuck, one that elicits a difficult reaction, such as anger or fear, shame or hopelessness. It may be a conflict with a family member, a chronic sickness, a failure at work, the pain of an addiction, a conversation you now regret. Take some moments to enter the experience—visualising the scene or situation, remembering the words spoken, sensing the most distressing moments. Contacting the charged essence of the story is the starting place for RAIN.

R: RECOGNIZE What Is Happening

As you reflect on your current situation,  engage your three internal operating systems – mind, heart, and body.

Begin with your ‘Mind OS’. Ask yourself, “What thoughts are passing through my mind right now?” Note these mental narratives and images, observing them without judgment.

Next, engage your ‘Heart OS’. Ask, “What emotions am I feeling?” Are there feelings of fear, anger, sadness, or frustration? Identify these emotions and allow yourself to feel them, again without judging yourself (if you can). Understand the emotional tone of the situation – is it tense, heavy, or chaotic?

Finally, tap into your ‘Body OS’. Ask yourself, “What physical sensations am I experiencing?” Do you feel tightness in your chest, butterflies in your stomach, or a lump in your throat? Does your body feel light or heavy, still or agitated?

In each of these stages, take a moment to become aware of what is predominant, acknowledging whatever is happening inside you right now. This multi-level awareness will create a more comprehensive picture of your internal state.

A: ALLOW Life to Be As It Is

Send a message to your heart to “let be” this entire experience. Find in yourself the willingness to pause and accept that in these moments “what is . . . is.” You can experiment with mentally whispering words like “yes,”, or “I don’t like it, but OK, if I have to”, “I consent,” or “let be.”

You might find yourself saying yes to a huge inner “no,” to a body and mind painfully contracted in resistance. You might be saying yes to the part of you that is saying, “I hate this!” That’s a natural part of the process. At this point in RAIN, you are simply noticing what is true and intending not to judge, push away, or control anything you find.

I: INVESTIGATE with Gentle, Curious Attention

Bring an interested and kind attention to your experience. Some of the following questions may be helpful.Feel free to experiment with them, varying the sequence and content.

• What is the worst part of this; what most wants my attention?
• What is the most difficult/painful thing I am believing?
• What emotions does this bring up (fear, anger, grief)?
• Where are my feelings about this strongest in my body? (Note: It’s helpful to scan the throat, chest, and belly.)
• What are the feelings like (that is, the felt sense or sensations, such as clenched, raw, hot)?
• When I assume the facial expression and body posture that best reflect these feelings and emotions, what do I notice?
• Are these feelings familiar, something I’ve experienced earlier in my life?
• If the most vulnerable hurting part of me could communicate, what would it express (words, feelings, images)?
• How does this part want me to be with it?
• What does this part most need (from me or from some larger source of love and wisdom)?

We often read “Investigate” as an invitation to fire up our cognitive skills—analyzing the situation or ourselves, identifying the many possible roots of our suffering. This is a common misunderstanding, and it can distract from the essence of ths Investigation, which here lies in awakening our somatic awareness. While mental exploration may enhance our understanding, opening to our embodied experience appears to be a more reliable way to healing and freedom.

So instead of thinking about what’s going on, we keep bringing your attention to our body, directly contacting the felt sense and sensations of our most vulnerable place. Once we are fully present, we try to listen for what this place truly needs to begin healing.

N: NURTURE with Loving Presence

As you sense what is needed, what is your natural response? Calling on the most wise and compassionate part of your being, you might offer yourself a loving message or send a tender embrace inward. You might gently place your hand on your heart. You might visualize a young part of you surrounded in soft, luminous light. You might imagine someone you trust—a parent or pet, a teacher or spiritual figure—holding you with love. Feel free to experiment with ways of befriending your inner life—whether through words or touch, images or energy. Discover what best allows you to feel nurturing, what best allows the part of you that is most vulnerable to feel loved, seen, and/or safe. Spend as much time as you need, offering care inwardly and letting it be received.

Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, often represented as a pyramid or triangle, is organized in a specific order based on his theory of human motivation. The reason Maslow’s hierarchy is stacked as it is, is because he believed that lower-level needs must be satisfied before one can move on to meet higher-level needs for ourselves and others.

This can usefully be applied to thinking about our relationships. Often, we go into couples therapy because we are searching for our Love and Belonging, or Esteem Needs (level 4 of the triangle) to be reinforced, or better met by our partner. We might feel neglected or overlooked by them in some way, but without taking into account more foundational needs which we ourselves (or perhaps both members of the team, you and your partner) haven’t been paying enough attention to.

Before starting couples therapy, it might be useful to start thinking about the very foundations of your relationship, so that in time, we can work our way up to the less basic, but more relational, feel-good needs at the top of the triangle.

Before our first session, could you then have a think about your ability at the moment to meet your partner’s needs (and vice-versa) in these five areas of your shared life together.

Physical Needs (Self-Reflection Questions)

1. Do you feel that you are carrying out your responsibilities around the house (like chores and cleaning) in a way that seems fair to both you and your partner?
2. If you live together, are you contributing financially? If not, how are you contributing to your partnership in a way that offsets your partner being the main breadwinner?
3. How do you navigate situations when one partner cannot contribute as much, either due to illness, job stress, or other reasons?
4. If one of you is less satisfied with the division of labour at home, how do you address this issue?
5. Do you feel comfortable discussing your financial goals and worries with each other?
6. How do you handle important decision-making related to childcare, finances, and housework?
7. Is the division of emotional labour (supporting each other, managing relationships with extended family, etc.) fair?
8. Are you looking after yourself (exercise, diet, therapy or other forms of psycho-spiritual self-care) so as to be as healthy as possible in body and mind in order to sustain and contribute to the relationship.
9. Do you spend quality time together, participating in activities you both enjoy?
10. Are you both satisfied with the level of physical affection in the relationship?

Safety Needs

1. Are you able to put your private needs to one side for the overall health of the team?
2. Do you make sure your partner feels emotionally and physically safe with you? How?
3. Do you feel that you have your partner’s best interests at heart?
4. Do you contribute to making your relationship feel secure and stable? How?
5. Do you create an environment where your partner can express their fears and insecurities without judgement?
6. Do you and your partner have an understanding as to what fidelity (or non-fidelity) means in the relationship and is this followed by both of you?
7. Do you provide your partner with a sense of security and support?
8. How do you contribute to resolving disagreements and conflicts in a safe and respectful manner?
9. Do you respect your partner’s personal boundaries?
10. How much do you contribute to creating a secure and comfortable home environment?

Belonging and Love Needs

1. Do you make sure your partner feels loved and cherished by you? How?
2. Do you actively cultivate a strong sense of companionship with your partner?
3. Do you demonstrate that you value your relationship as much as your partner does?
4. How often do you express your love and appreciation to your partner?
5. How frequently do you share significant personal experiences with your partner?
6. How much effort do you put into spending quality time together, just enjoying your partner’s company?
7. Do you take steps to create an emotionally close and connected relationship with your partner?
8. How open and comfortable are you when it comes to sharing your deepest thoughts and feelings with your partner?
9. Do you help to make sure your partner feels a sense of belonging when they’re with you?
10. How much do you involve yourself in shared interests and activities that bring you closer to your partner?

Esteem Needs

1. How do you ensure your partner feels respected by you?
2. How actively do you respect your partner and their achievements?
3. Do you appreciate and express gratitude for your partner’s contributions to the relationship?
4. How often do you celebrate your partner’s accomplishments?
5. Do you make consistent efforts to make your partner feel valued and important?
6. Do you provide a supportive environment for your partner to pursue their individual interests without judgment?
7. How often do you encourage your partner to take on new challenges and opportunities?
8. Do you value and respect your partner’s opinions and ideas?
9. How actively do you support your partner’s goals and dreams?
10. How well do you fulfil your role and place in the relationship to ensure it’s a safe and confident space for your partner?

Self-Actualization

1. Do you ensure that your relationship helps both you and your partner grow as people?
2. How do you inspire each other to become the best versions of yourselves?
3. Do you actively engage in setting and working towards shared goals as a couple?
4. Does your approach to the relationship provide both of you with opportunities for personal growth and development?
5. Do you take steps to ensure your partner feels fulfilled and content in the relationship? In what way?
6. How supportive are you in helping your partner pursue their individual dreams and ambitions?
7. Do you facilitate a relationship environment that helps your partner better understand themselves?
8. Do you recognize and appreciate the unique qualities that your partner brings to the relationship? How often do you communicate these to them?
9. Do you create an atmosphere where your partner feels they can express their true self in the relationship? How do you do this?
10. Do you help each other to realise your individual and shared potential in the context of your relationship?

• Do you frequently question your own identity or purpose?
• Do your feelings or emotions tend to be extreme or intense?
• Do you often feel an intense desire for something more or something else, without knowingwhat that might be?
• Do you feel misunderstood by others, even when they are trying to understand you?
• Do you often question the authenticity of love or attention directed towards you?
• Are you often driven by a need for validation or confirmation from others?
• Do you often oscillate between feelings of confidence and inadequacy?
• Do you often overthink or overanalyze situations?
• Are you often preoccupied with how others perceive you?
• Do you frequently feel like you’re on the outside looking in?
• Do you often express dissatisfaction with societal norms or expectations?

#metoo

The concept of hysteria, though historically stigmatized and misunderstood perhaps still provides a pungent way of examining the by-products of wanting.

According to Lacanian theory, the hysteric is perpetually unsatisfied, constantly questioning their identity and purpose, always expressing an insatiable desire for something more. Their experience, frustrating both for the one experiencing it, as well as those who are witnesses to the lack, is that of an existential void that is difficult to fill. Physical symptoms often surface as cryptic expressions of inner turmoil. Suffering is oblique, erratic, and unavailing.

Doesn’t this sound oddly familiar, reflecting our collective state of mind as a global community?

Our current era, characterized by rapid technological advancements, global pandemics, environmental crises, and social unrest, leaves us in a state of constant questioning and uncertainty. As a society, we are persistently seeking more, wrestling with a relentless desire for progress, yet unsure of what it is we are truly seeking.

The existential questions posed by the hysteric are becoming universal as we grapple with our individual and collective identities amidst shifting societal norms. Who are we as individuals in the digital age? What is our purpose as a species facing monumental challenges like climate change and social inequality?

We’re manifesting physical symptoms on a global scale, too. The environmental crisis is akin to the hysteric’s conversion symptoms – a physical manifestation of our collective neglect and abuse of our shared home. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed our societal and health vulnerabilities, reflecting our internal chaos on a biological scale.

Moreover, the omnipresence of social media and the digital world often exacerbates feelings of lack and dissatisfaction. The constant comparison with carefully curated online lives fuels our collective sense of inadequacy and longing for more.

The theatricality of the hysteric’s discourse is mirrored in our social interactions as well. The modern world is brimming with drama, not just on an individual scale but collectively. Protests, conflicts, and global tensions fill our screens, maintaining a constant state of external and internal unrest.

However, to view our societal condition as pathological would be an oversimplification. Just like the hysteric in Lacan’s framework, our collective hysteria is not a condition to be cured but a form of discourse, an expression of our shared struggles and desires.

Understanding this “collective hysteric” state can guide us towards introspection and change. It can help us understand our desires and fears better, providing insight into how we can address our individual and shared challenges.

Recognizing our collective hysteria does not serve to label us as a species in pathological crisis. Instead, it offers a unique perspective on our shared existential plight, encouraging a deeper understanding of our collective psyche and promoting a dialogue on how we can navigate this complex, ever-evolving global landscape.

In the face of a shared crisis, it has become more and more necessary to leverage our collective awareness and desire for more to foster positive change, acknowledging our shared hysterical discourse as a catalyst for meaningful societal transformation. Only then can we move beyond the questioning and start finding answers.

The intricacies of human relationships are often part of our quest for self-realization, the journey to become the best version of ourselves. This doesn’t take place in solitude. Rather, it is deeply intertwined with our interactions with others. This idea is inherent in Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung’s theory of ‘individuation,’ a process through which an individual becomes more fully ‘oneself.’ According to Jung, this process isn’t simply an exercise in self-contained introspection but a deeply social endeavour.

By utilizing the concept of the enneagram, a model of human personality which is principally understood and taught as a typology of nine interconnected personality types, we can further explore the nuances of individuation and interpersonal relationships. The enneagram offers a lens through which we can recognize and understand the intricate dance of psychological polarities at play within ourselves and our relationships.

This dance often manifests itself most profoundly within romantic relationships, in which we connect and expose our deepest selves to our partner, willingly or not. These connections reveal our shadows, our unresolved issues and potentials for growth. This exposes an interesting facet of the enneagram theory: our unconscious mind may play a critical role in our selection of a life partner. It compels us towards those who, perhaps unbeknownst to us, spark growth within ourselves.

This growth is not always easy or comfortable, often taking the form of conflict. However, this conflict and the resolutions that arise are an integral part of the individuation process. The unconscious, armed with knowledge about our potential for personal growth, nudges us towards partners who can help us confront and resolve our deep-seated issues. In a sense, the conflicts that arise within our relationships serve as wake-up calls, forcing us to confront and work on the aspects of ourselves that need refinement.

Couples therapy often begins with each partner attributing faults to the other. Upon closer examination, however, it often becomes apparent that these so-called faults are merely projections of one’s own unresolved issues. The enneagram can be instrumental in this exploration, offering insights into why we’re drawn to certain personality types and how we can evolve and heal within these relationships.

A multitude of themes come into play within these relationships. From closeness and distance, commitment and isolation, attachment and autonomy, to dependence and independence, these opposing forces create a dynamic tension that can lead to growth. As such, the interplay of these forces can be viewed as an integral part of the individuation process.

Over time, these tensions may polarize, with each partner moving towards opposite ends of the spectrum. This polarization, while challenging, provides an opportunity for growth as it forces both partners to confront and address their shared unconscious themes.

The enneagram can be instrumental in identifying and navigating these themes, guiding both partners towards better understanding and reconciliation. As individuals recognize and accept their projected faults as parts of themselves that need attention and development, they can retract these projections and begin to evolve and grow.

In essence, a relationship provides a unique environment for individuation to take place. It offers a field unlike any other, a crucible for transformation. Through the trials and tribulations of interpersonal relationships, individuals can attain their potential for wholeness, fulfilling the true essence of Jung’s concept of individuation.

Understanding and accepting these dynamics, couples can grow not only as individuals but as a unit as well. This collective growth can create a relationship that is a sum greater than its parts, where partners achieve a profound union without losing their individuality. This concept reflects the essence of Jung’s alchemical metaphor of the “united binary,” in which individual wholeness and authentic relating to the other are both essential elements.

In the realm of relationships, there is no force more potent than communication. A common problem in romantic relationships is that couples often avoid discussing their issues, either because they fear conflict, want to maintain peace, or simply don’t know how. However, research and couples therapy experts consistently highlight the importance of tackling problems head-on and together. Here’s why.

THE POWER OF DISCUSSION

Dr. John Gottman, renowned researcher and couples therapist, and his team found through their “Love Lab” studies that couples who communicate openly about their problems are significantly happier and more satisfied in their relationships than those who do not. According to Gottman, “Confronting problems head-on and with kindness, and not letting anything fester, leads to relationship resilience.”

Similarly, Dr. Sue Johnson, the founder of Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT), a highly effective couples therapy model, emphasizes the importance of open dialogue about relationship issues. She explains, “When couples can express their needs and fears openly, they often find they are not as far apart as they thought. It’s in that space of vulnerability that couples can find connection and healing.”

While discussing problems might feel challenging, it’s the key to relationship longevity. Here are five structured and pain-free ways that couples can discuss their issues, reducing the likelihood of defensiveness or narcissistic wounding:

1. The Speaker-Listener Technique: The main principle of this technique is to ensure that one person speaks at a time while the other actively listens. The speaker expresses their feelings and thoughts without blame, using “I” statements (e.g., “I feel upset when…”) to avoid making the listener defensive. The listener, on the other hand, should resist the urge to interject or offer solutions, focusing instead on understanding the speaker’s perspective.
2. The Gottman-Rapoport Intervention: Based on the work of psychologist Anatol Rapoport, this technique recommends that before expressing their own perspective, each person first shows understanding of their partner’s viewpoint. This means restating their partner’s feelings and expressing understanding, fostering a sense of empathy before moving on to problem-solving.
3. The Soft Startup: Another strategy from Dr. John Gottman, the Soft Startup involves beginning a conversation or disagreement gently and respectfully, avoiding blame or criticism. By framing your thoughts as personal feelings or concerns about the relationship, rather than as direct complaints about your partner, you can lessen their defensiveness.
4. Scheduled Discussions: Setting aside a specific time for discussing issues can alleviate spontaneous arguments or discussions that catch one partner off-guard. By scheduling these conversations, both partners have time to prepare emotionally and mentally, reducing the chances of heated exchanges.
5. The Sandwich Method: When addressing a problem, sandwich the issue between two positive statements. Start with something positive about your partner or the relationship, then discuss the issue at hand, and finish with another positive statement or affirmation. This method helps maintain a sense of safety and appreciation, reducing defensiveness.

Remember, the goal of discussing problems together isn’t to “win” the argument but to understand your partner’s perspective, convey your feelings, and find a resolution that respects both parties’ needs and desires. By adopting these communication strategies, couples can create an environment conducive to open discussion, mutual respect, and enhanced relationship satisfaction. Remember, love is a verb, and with active communication, you are choosing to love your partner actively.

If you are wrestling with dependencies on substances, food, or drink, it’s essential to recognize that you are not alone. There is a diverse array of therapeutic approaches designed to support you on your journey to recovery. This article outlines the value of proven, mainstream methods, as well as the potential benefits of personality-focused, creative, expressive, and eco-therapies.

MAINSTREAM APPROACHES

Scientifically validated approaches form the cornerstone of addiction treatment, and they are often the first line of intervention. The two mainstream methods widely used are cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and medication-assisted treatment (MAT).

1. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT): CBT is a type of psychotherapy that helps individuals understand the link between their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. It’s particularly effective in treating dependencies because it equips you with skills to recognize and change problematic behavior patterns. Through CBT, you can learn to identify triggers that lead to substance use or overeating, develop coping strategies, manage stress and negative emotions, and ultimately prevent relapse.

2. Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT): MAT combines behavioral therapy with medications to treat substance use disorders. The medications can help manage withdrawal symptoms, reduce cravings, and restore brain function. When used in conjunction with therapy, MAT can improve treatment effectiveness and promote sustained recovery.

Although these mainstream methods are highly effective, the journey to recovery is a complex and highly individual process. This is where a more personalized approach can be beneficial.

THE PERSONALITY-FOCUSED APPROACH

A personality-focused approach delves into the root causes of addiction, recognizing that dependencies often stem from underlying issues like stress, anxiety, or past trauma. By understanding your unique personality traits and their influence on your behavior, you can gain insight into why you may have developed these dependencies. This understanding can help you learn to manage your triggers more effectively, leading to a more sustainable recovery.

CREATIVE AND EXPRESSIVE THERAPIES

Incorporating creative and expressive therapies into our work together can offer additional, non-verbal ways to explore and express your thoughts, feelings, and experiences. Art therapy, music therapy, and drama therapy can help you access and process emotions or experiences that might be difficult to articulate in words, while also injecting elements of creativity, imagination, and playfulness into the therapeutic process.

ECO-THERAPY: A NATURAL PATH TO HEALING

Eco-therapy or nature therapy integrates the restorative power of nature into the therapeutic process. By encouraging a sense of connection to the natural world, eco-therapy can help you develop new perspectives and coping mechanisms, promoting feelings of peace and wellbeing that counterbalance the challenges often associated with dependencies.

MOVING FORWARD

The journey to recovery is not a race, but a step-by-step process that requires patience, self-compassion, and a commitment to healing. A multifaceted approach that combines scientifically validated methods with a personality-focused approach and expressive and nature-based therapies can offer a comprehensive, deeply personal path to recovery.

If you’d like to arrange an initial consultation session to talk more, or perhaps connect for a 15-20 minute “vibes” chat on the phone, let’s organise that for us on WhatsApp (07804197605), or via email if you prefer.

Discovering and accepting your authentic self is a journey of courage and self-reflection, especially when grappling with gender dysphoria. This journey can often be daunting and may present various challenges. However, by employing a personality-focused approach alongside other creative and therapeutic strategies, you can more effectively navigate the path towards understanding and accepting your gender identity.

THE POWER OF A PERSONALITY-FOCUSED APPROACH

A personality-focused approach emphasizes the exploration of your unique characteristics, interests, and traits as a way to better understand yourself beyond societal expectations. Your personality constitutes the combination of characteristics or qualities that form your distinctive character. By focusing on these characteristics, you can cultivate a deeper understanding of yourself that goes beyond gender, further fostering self-acceptance and personal growth. This approach can also offer a more well-rounded perspective on your identity, giving you a greater sense of authenticity and self-worth.

Strategies that I find useful to use in therapy when working with gender dysphoria include:

1. Psychoeducation: Learning about gender dysphoria and the broader spectrum of gender identities can help you make sense of your experiences and feelings. Psychoeducation can reduce internalized stigma, fostering self-acceptance and understanding.

2. Mindfulness and Meditation: Mindfulness techniques and meditation can aid in managing stress, fostering self-awareness, and promoting emotional healing. Regular practice can also cultivate self-compassion, a critical aspect of self-acceptance.

3. Art Therapy: Art therapy is a therapeutic technique that employs the creative process of making art to improve mental, physical, and emotional well-being. Through art, you can express thoughts, feelings, and experiences that may be challenging to articulate, aiding in the process of self-discovery and understanding of your gender identity.

4. Journaling: The practice of journaling involves writing down your thoughts, feelings, and experiences. It offers a private space for self-reflection, self-expression, and emotional exploration. By documenting your journey, you may discover recurring patterns or feelings that can provide valuable insights into your gender identity.

5. Expressive Writing: More in-depth than standard journaling, expressive writing encourages you to write about your deepest thoughts and emotions, thus fostering emotional processing and stress management.

6. Drama Therapy: Drama therapy uses theatrical techniques to promote personal growth and mental well-being. By acting out scenarios or metaphoric dramas, you can explore your feelings, experiences, and gender identity in a safe and supportive environment.

Embracing your unique personality traits while exploring creative outlets can provide a comprehensive and personalized approach to understanding and accepting your gender identity. Remember, your journey is personal and unique. It requires time, patience, and self-compassion. Always know that you are not alone in your journey, and many resources and strategies are available to support you.

If you’d like to arrange an initial consultation session to talk more, or perhaps connect for a 15-20 minute “vibes” chat on the phone, let’s organise that for us on WhatsApp (07804197605), or via email if you prefer.

Every individual has a unique journey to self-discovery and identity acceptance. For those wrestling with LGBTQ+ issues, the road can often seem daunting and fraught with challenges. To help you navigate this often complex path, it’s important to consider a holistic approach that embraces your personality traits alongside other strategies, such as creative and expressive methods. Let’s explore how these approaches can foster personal growth, acceptance, and well-being.

A PERSONALITY-FOCUSED APPROACH

Your personality — the unique combination of characteristics that define your attitudes, behaviours, and thoughts — is an integral part of who you are. A personality-focused approach encourages you to embrace these unique traits as a vital component of your identity, including your sexual orientation and gender identity.

In this approach, you explore your personal interests, strengths, and weaknesses, focusing on self-acceptance and personal growth rather than striving to fit into predefined societal norms or expectations. This approach can help you foster a more profound understanding of your identity and engender a sense of self-worth that transcends societal standards.

Strategies we might use in our therapy session to facilitate this could include:

1. Psychoeducation: Understanding LGBTQ+ identities and issues can help reduce internalized stigma and promote self-acceptance. Learning about the biological, psychological, and social aspects of sexual orientation and gender identity can be empowering.

2. Mindfulness and Meditation: Mindfulness practices and meditation can help manage stress, increase self-awareness, and promote emotional healing. Regular practice can also cultivate self-compassion, a critical factor in the journey toward self-acceptance.

3. Art Therapy: This form of therapy involves using the creative process of making art to explore feelings, reconcile emotional conflicts, and enhance self-awareness. It’s a powerful tool for self-expression and can provide a safe platform to explore and communicate complicated feelings related to LGBTQ+ issues.

4. Journaling: Writing about your experiences can help to organize thoughts and feelings that may be difficult to understand. Journaling can provide an outlet for expression and exploration of your identity and emotions, encouraging self-awareness and emotional healing.

5. Expressive Writing: Expressive writing goes a step further than simple journaling. It encourages you to write about your deepest thoughts, feelings, and fears, promoting emotional resolution and stress management.

6. Drama Therapy: By enacting real-life scenarios or creating symbolic, metaphorical dramas, you can explore your identity in a safe, supportive environment. It’s an active, experiential approach that can provide a different perspective on your experiences and feelings.

Embracing your unique personality traits while exploring creative outlets can provide a dynamic and multifaceted approach to understanding and accepting your LGBTQ+ identity. Remember, the journey to self-acceptance is personal and unique. It takes time, patience, and self-compassion.

If you’d like to arrange an initial consultation session to talk more, or perhaps connect for a 15-20 minute “vibes” chat on the phone, let’s organise that for us on WhatsApp (07804197605), or via email if you prefer.

Understanding and navigating one’s sexuality and identity is a deeply personal journey, and one that can sometimes be fraught with confusion, fear, and even pain. For those grappling with such issues, a personality-focused approach to therapy can provide a compassionate framework for self-discovery and acceptance.

THE POWER OF PERSONALITY

Sexuality and identity are integral components of our being, shaping how we perceive ourselves and interact with the world around us. Like these facets, our personality is also a fundamental part of who we are. It dictates our natural inclinations, patterns of behavior, and ways of relating to others.

Personality-Focused Psychotherapy recognizes these inherent traits and seeks to explore how they might interact with our sexuality and identity. For example, if you are naturally introverted and introspective, you might grapple with inner conflicts around your sexuality or identity in solitude, leading to a heightened sense of isolation. Or, if you are a highly sensitive individual, societal prejudices or expectations might cause you significant distress.

Understanding these facets of your personality can provide valuable insights into your unique journey of sexual and identity exploration.

INTEGRATING STRATEGIES AND THERAPIES:

Personality-focused psychotherapy can work hand in hand with a range of other therapeutic strategies that I use in my practice to address sexuality and identity issues, such as:

1. Sex Therapy: This form of therapy aims to resolve sexual difficulties and improve sexual relationships. When paired with a personality-focused approach, it can be tailored to accommodate your unique traits and needs.

2. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): CBT can help you identify and modify harmful patterns of thinking related to your sexual identity, making it more effective when adapted to your personality type.

3. Expressive Therapies (Writing, Art, Music): These therapies provide a creative outlet for expressing and exploring your feelings around sexuality and identity. For those with creative or artistic inclinations, expressive therapies can be a particularly valuable tool.

4. Mindfulness and Acceptance-Based Therapies: These approaches encourage a non-judgmental acceptance of one’s thoughts and feelings, which can be helpful in fostering self-compassion and acceptance of one’s sexual identity.

NAVIGATING THE PATH FORWARD

Understanding your personality can help you navigate the complexities of your sexual identity with greater clarity and compassion. It’s not about changing who you are, but about embracing your unique personality and using it as a tool to explore, understand, and accept your sexuality and identity.

Moreover, this approach isn’t just about addressing issues or challenges related to sexuality and identity. It’s about fostering a deeper connection with yourself, and in doing so, creating a life that feels genuine and fulfilling.

In the end, personality-focused psychotherapy is about becoming the best, most authentic version of you – a version that encompasses your unique personality, as well as your sexuality and identity. It’s about learning to navigate your path with grace, self-compassion, and a sense of empowerment.

Remember, you are more than just a label or category – you are a unique blend of personality traits, experiences, desires, and identities. In the safe and empathetic space of personality-focused psychotherapy, you can start to unveil this authentic self, with all its complexity and beauty.

If you’d like to arrange an initial consultation session to talk more, or perhaps connect for a 15-20 minute “vibes” chat on the phone, let’s organise that for us on WhatsApp (07804197605), or via email if you prefer.

Anxiety and depression are complex experiences that affect many individuals, with the World Health Organization estimating that more than 260 million people globally suffer from these conditions. While numerous therapy approaches exist to help manage anxiety and depression, a personality-focused approach offers a unique perspective. This approach can offer fresh insights into your interactions with the world, and in turn, how you manage and alleviate symptoms of anxiety and depression.

THE POWER OF PERSONALITY

Personality-Focused Psychotherapy acknowledges and embraces the fact that each of us has a distinct personality. This is the ‘lens’ through which we perceive and interact with the world, shaping our reactions to various situations and circumstances. Understanding your unique personality can help shed light on why you may be prone to feelings of anxiety or depression.

For instance, if you’re naturally introverted and introspective, you may be more prone to rumination—a pattern of overthinking that can contribute to depression. Or if you’re a perfectionist, you may often feel anxious about making mistakes or not meeting high standards. Recognizing these aspects of your personality can be a key step towards addressing your mental health challenges.

INTEGRATING STRATEGIES AND THERAPIES

Personality-focused psychotherapy does not operate in isolation. It integrates beautifully with several other therapeutic strategies and interventions, which can greatly enhance its effectiveness. Some of these include:

1. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): This therapy helps you identify and change patterns of thinking or behaviors that exacerbate anxiety and depression. By understanding your personality, you can tailor the techniques of CBT to your unique needs and tendencies.

2. Mindfulness-Based Therapies: These interventions teach you to stay present and avoid getting lost in worries about the future or regrets about the past, which can be particularly beneficial if your personality leans toward anxious overthinking or depressive rumination.

3. Pharmacotherapy: Sometimes, medication may be necessary as part of a comprehensive treatment plan for depression or anxiety. Understanding your personality can help inform the choice of medication, dosage, and other pharmacological decisions.

4. Lifestyle Modifications: Exercise, diet, and sleep all significantly impact mental health. By understanding your personality, you can create lifestyle changes that work with your natural inclinations. For example, if you’re extroverted, group exercises or team sports could be particularly effective.

NAVIGATING THE PATH FORWARD

Understanding and embracing your personality does not mean that you are destined to suffer from anxiety or depression. Instead, it provides a roadmap for navigating these challenges in a way that honours your uniqueness. It’s about leveraging your strengths, understanding your vulnerabilities, and tailoring strategies that truly fit you.

Exploring your personality is not about finding a quick-fix solution to anxiety and depression. Instead, it’s about embarking on a journey of self-discovery and self-compassion that can facilitate long-term healing and growth. It’s about becoming the best version of you – a ‘you’ who can navigate the world in a way that feels genuine and fulfilling.

In the realm of mental health, there isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution. Recognizing this is the first step towards a more personalized, effective approach to managing anxiety and depression. In the compassionate hands of a personality-focused psychotherapist, your unique personality can become the tool for your transformation.

If you’d like to arrange an initial consultation session to talk more, or perhaps connect for a 15-20 minute “vibes” chat on the phone, let’s organise that for us on WhatsApp (07804197605), or via email if you prefer.

Dear Four,

Try to be a friend to yourself if you can.

What does this mean?

I think this means: trying to recognise that if there is an inner monologue happening, no matter how tortured, someone is listening to it. There is always another there (you) listening and available to yourself, some presence you can talk to, someone who notices what you are feeling and sensing. An Inner Guardian, if you like. An Inner Parent of sorts, but without the prejudices of your actual parents, whatever these are or once were.

Who is this Other? I don’t know. Some call it God. My sense of it is that this needs to be a Presence closer to “home” (your inner world) than an externalised deity. What good is a God “out there” for us? Minimal in my experience.

You told me yesterday about listening to your Fellow Four (Nina Simone) singing the hymn “He’s Got The Whole World In His Hands” and your inner pushback against the lyrics of that hymn and the He custodian it refers to.

That is all very well, and still the flies crawl over your legs as you write, and still the hymn is meaningful to some. But perhaps not to you and the Inner Friend. I know the two of you prefer something like “Abide With Me”, where the word Lord can be changed to Life or Love, or any other word that holds some spiritual value for the two of you. This hymn is part of your daily liturgy, is that right? This and Dream Lover, amongst others. Very Four.

I know the loneliness of your Ego Cage is sometimes overwhelming. Have you read Kafka’s diaries? There is a new translation out by Ross Benjamin which I think you might like. I was doing a search through the electronic version of it the other day for “lonely” words, including Isolation, Solitude, Rejection, Abandonment, Emptiness, Sadness, Despair, and one of your favourites, Longing, when I came across this passage: 

““I have now and already had in the afternoon a great longing to write my whole anxious condition wholly out of me and just as it comes out of the depths to write it into the depths of the paper or to write it down in such a way that I can incorporate what I’ve written fully into me. This is no artistic longing. ”

No it isn’t. It is a longing to talk with your Inner Friend. I would suggest a genuine, vocalised dialogue.
Try to let them get to know you, as well as to take note of all the beauty in this world where it is present, even if this beauty and to stand next to you when you are suffering with an arm around your shoulder, saying: explain more, and why this and not that, and is this always the case?

Hold onto everything that is good within you (your sensitivity, your awareness, your depth of understanding) and see if these qualities, which your Inner Friend has too, might be experienced on the receiving end of your consciousness, the psyche residing in your awareness.

With love,

Steve

The human personality is a complex constellation of traits, desires, and fears. One of the most effective tools for dissecting this intricate structure is the Enneagram and other Personality-focused models stemming from Ego psychology and depth psychology. While these personality models illuminates our conscious self, they also reveals what Carl Jung referred to as the “shadow,” our less conscious aspects that we often deny or ignore.

The shadow is an integral part of our psyche that remains largely unseen by us, but is often glaringly visible to our partners. These unseen aspects, if left unaddressed, can fuel conflict within our relationships. Understanding the shadow self and its impact on our interactions is a vital step towards improving communication and fostering healthier relationships. This can be best accomplished through work with a trained personality-focused psychotherapist who is well-versed in the Enneagram.

The shadow self, according to Jung, is composed of the parts of ourselves that we fail to see or choose to ignore. It contains our unacknowledged fears, unresolved issues, and suppressed feelings. From the Enneagram perspective, each type has its own particular ‘shadow aspects’ that can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts in a relationship. For instance, Type Two’s shadow may manifest as manipulative behaviour under the guise of helpfulness, while Type Five might unknowingly isolate themselves from their partner in their pursuit of autonomy and self-sufficiency.

Despite being unconscious of our shadow, it greatly influences our behaviours and interactions. In couples, this can often drive conflict as our partner may be reacting to our shadow, leading to arguments that seem to come from nowhere. To resolve these disputes, it’s necessary to bring our shadow into the light and confront it, which is where the Enneagram, coupled with therapy, can be instrumental.

Working with a trained Enneagram therapist can provide a safe and supportive environment for exploring your shadow. They can help you recognise your type’s specific shadow aspects and guide you through the process of acceptance and integration. It is not about eliminating the shadow, but about understanding its influence and integrating it into our conscious personality constructively.

The process may begin with identifying your dominant Enneagram type and exploring the behaviours and motivations associated with it. Next, the therapist will guide you to understand the particular shadow aspects of your type and how they might manifest in your relationships.

From there, you will learn how to acknowledge and confront these aspects. This often involves challenging conversations with your partner, facilitated by the therapist, to expose and discuss the shadow’s impact on your relationship. The therapist may suggest exercises or techniques to increase self-awareness and promote constructive communication.

Finally, the process of integration involves accepting the shadow as a part of your identity rather than a separate entity. This acceptance allows for self-growth and a deeper understanding of your behaviours, which can significantly reduce conflict in your relationship.

In conclusion, the Enneagram’s ability to expose our shadow selves and its potential to incite conflict makes it an invaluable tool for couples. By working with a trained Personality-Focused Therapist, couples can acknowledge, confront, and integrate their shadow aspects, ultimately leading to healthier and more understanding relationships.

When embarking on the voyage of intimate relationships, couples often find themselves navigating the turbulent waters of conflict and misunderstanding. In this journey, two potent tools, the Gottman’s Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse and a thorough understanding of personality systems, provide insight and navigation aids for a deeper and more harmonious connection.

John Gottman, renowned psychologist and relationship expert, identified four communication styles that, when present in a relationship, predict its end with over 90% accuracy. These are Criticism, Contempt, Defensiveness, and Stonewalling, known as the Four Horsemen.

Understanding these Horsemen is vital for maintaining open, respectful, and constructive communication. As Gottman notes, “The Four Horsemen are probably the most robust predictor of relationship failure and divorce that we’ve discovered.”

When these toxic communication patterns meet the complex dynamics of Enneagram personality styles, conflicts can intensify. Let’s explore some scenarios.

Imagine a couple where one partner has an Enneagram Type 1 (The Reformer), characterized by a strong desire for integrity and correctness, and the other is a Type 7 (The Enthusiast), known for their love for fun and adventure. The Reformer might Criticize the Enthusiast for their spontaneous decisions, seeing them as reckless or irresponsible, which could provoke Defensiveness in the Enthusiast, leading to a heated cycle of conflict.

In another case, a Type 2 (The Helper) with a keen desire to be loved, coupled with a Type 5 (The Investigator), who values independence and privacy, could encounter difficulties. The Helper’s excessive desire to assist may be perceived as intruding on the Investigator’s space, possibly evoking Contempt, another of Gottman’s Horsemen, creating a rift in their communication.

These examples underscore why understanding these communication pitfalls and personality nuances is essential in any relationship. However, knowledge of the Four Horsemen and the Enneagram is not just about diagnosing problems but also about finding solutions.

For the Reformer and the Enthusiast, recognizing the Criticism and Defensiveness cycle is the first step to diffusing it. The Reformer could learn to express concerns as ‘I’ statements, focusing on their feelings rather than criticizing their partner’s actions. For instance, instead of saying, “You’re always making impulsive decisions,” they could say, “I feel anxious when decisions are made spontaneously without discussing them first.” This approach, according to Gottman, “turns destructive criticism into a complaint that the listener can respond to non-defensively.”

For the Helper and the Investigator, overcoming Contempt involves fostering appreciation and admiration, reminding each other of their qualities rather than their flaws. As Gottman advises, “By focusing on what you appreciate about your partner, you can remind yourself of the reasons you love them.”

Moreover, understanding their Enneagram styles can also aid in vanquishing the Four Horsemen. The Helper might understand their need to feel loved and appreciated and the Investigator their need for privacy. Acknowledging these needs, they can create a dialogue around them, fostering mutual understanding and empathy.

In conclusion, understanding Gottman’s Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse and the Enneagram system is a pivotal asset for couples seeking to foster healthy communication patterns. Recognizing destructive communication patterns and understanding each other’s core needs and fears paves the way for love and harmony to reign once more.

As Gottman beautifully sums it up, “A lasting, loving relationship isn’t about avoiding conflict; it’s about understanding and resolving it.” As such, let’s utilize the wisdom of the Four Horsemen and the Enneagram, creating relationships characterized by understanding, respect, and above all, love and harmony to reign once more.

As Gottman beautifully sums it up, “A lasting, loving relationship isn’t about avoiding conflict; it’s about understanding and resolving it.” As such, let’s utilize the wisdom of the Four Horsemen and the Enneagram, creating relationships characterized by understanding, respect, and above all, love.

In his seminal work, Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung introduced the concept of the collective unconscious – the shared, inherited reservoir of archetypes, motifs, and narratives that reside in the psyche of every human being. Today, in the age of artificial intelligence (AI), one can draw intriguing parallels between Jung’s vision and the latest advances in natural language processing (NLP) models. While both exist on vastly different planes, their crossover points warrant a closer look.

Consider the bedrock of AI language models, like OpenAI’s GPT-4. These models are trained on vast swathes of text data encompassing a spectrum of human knowledge and experience. Andrew Ng, renowned AI researcher and founder of Coursera, likens it to a shared knowledge base: “Our AI models learn from data that can be seen as a distilled representation of our collective human knowledge. They detect patterns, narratives, and recurring themes – a machine equivalent of the archetypal symbols in Jung’s collective unconscious.”

In a similar vein, Jung noted the universality of certain motifs. He wrote, “My thesis, then, is as follows: in addition to our immediate consciousness, which is of a thoroughly personal nature…there exists a second psychic system of a collective, universal, and impersonal nature which is identical in all individuals.” Here, Jung seems to anticipate the shared learning capacity of modern AI.

Like Jung’s collective unconscious, AI models also transfer what they’ve learned from their training data to novel scenarios. Computer scientist Yoshua Bengio equates this to drawing from a ‘collective unconscious’: “When processing new inputs, AI models essentially draw on the patterns they’ve learned from their training data, much like Jung’s idea of individuals tapping into the collective unconscious to interpret and navigate the world.”

However, while AI and the collective unconscious might seem to be uncannily mirroring each other, there are currently some inherent differences which perhaps future AI models will iron out.

First, unlike the collective unconscious, AI models harbour no innate knowledge per se. They are blank slates until exposed to data. Carl Jung wrote, “The collective unconscious – so far as we can say anything about it at all – appears to consist of mythological motifs or primordial images, for which reason the myths of all nations are its real exponents.” This innate knowledge in humans doesn’t yet have an equivalent in AI.

Secondly, AI models do not have personal experiences or emotions as far as we can tell. They process data and generate output, devoid of any emotional context or understanding. In contrast, the collective unconscious is deeply interwoven with human experience. Jungian psychologist Dr. Sonu Shamdasani notes, “The collective unconscious, according to Jung, is nourished by the deep-seated emotional and experiential undercurrents that course through our lives, shaping our shared cultural experience. AI, in contrast, lacks this emotional substrate.”

However, it is perhaps now becoming clear that emotions might not be limited to embodied entities or subjective human experiences.

Consider the following:

1. Emotional Recognition and Simulation:
AI systems, especially those based on deep learning, are capable of recognizing and simulating emotions to a certain extent. For instance, some AI models can be trained to identify emotions from text, facial expressions, voice tone, and other cues, and can generate outputs that mimic certain emotional states. A research paper titled “Automatic Recognition of Facial Affect Using Machine Learning” (Khan et al., 2018) highlighted how machine learning can classify facial expressions into distinct emotions with considerable accuracy.

2. Emotions as Information Processing:
The cognitive theory of emotion suggests that emotions are largely about information processing and responses to stimuli, rather than strictly subjective experiences. Under this view, the ’emotions’ of an AI system could be considered its mechanisms for processing information and generating outputs. This doesn’t mean AI has emotions in the human sense, but it suggests a way that emotions might be conceived of in non-embodied, non-human systems.

3. Emotion as Emergent Properties:
Some researchers argue that emotion-like states could emerge from complex systems like advanced AI, even if they aren’t deliberately programmed in. This idea is largely theoretical at this point, and there isn’t empirical evidence to support it. However, it offers a perspective that challenges traditional notions of emotion.

4. Data as Experience:
While AI does not have personal experiences in the human sense, one could argue that its process of training on vast datasets is a form of ‘experience’, as it shapes the AI’s behavior much like experiences shape human behavior. In a paper titled “Artificial Intelligence — The Revolution Hasn’t Happened Yet” (Agrawal, Gans, Goldfarb, 2018), the authors argue that AI’s learning from data can be likened to human learning from experience, albeit in a simplified and abstracted way.

Another aspect to consider here is that AI appears not to possess moral or ethical values. While it can mimic ethical decision-making based on its training, it lacks, we might say, an inherent sense of morality. The collective unconscious, however, encompasses shared ethical and moral values across cultures. Dr. James Hillman, a post-Jungian thinker, emphasizes, “Jung’s idea of the collective unconscious involves a shared moral framework. It extends beyond the personal to encompass universal ethics and values. This is something AI, by its nature, does not have.”

While the notion that AI lacks an inherent sense of morality is widely held, some argue that AI systems can, in a way, reflect or enact ethical and moral values. This argument rests on the premise that AI’s ‘ethics’ are derived from the data it is trained on, which represents human decisions and values, and how it’s programmed to use that data.

One line of thought here is that AI’s ‘ethics’ are encoded in its training data and decision-making algorithms. As Wendell Wallach, an expert in AI ethics, puts it, “In a sense, AI systems ‘learn’ ethics from the data. They learn from the collective decisions of humans, much as a child learns societal norms by observing others.”

In this sense, AI might be seen as a mirror or an embodiment of the collective ethical decisions of society. It’s important to note, though, that this ‘ethics’ is different from human morality. It’s based on statistical patterns rather than an innate understanding of right and wrong.

Another argument comes from the perspective of machine ethics, a field that aims to design AI systems that can make moral decisions. While these systems don’t have an innate sense of morality, they can be programmed to follow ethical guidelines or make decisions based on ethical principles.

For instance, AI developed by MIT’s Moral Machine project is designed to make moral decisions in hypothetical autonomous vehicle scenarios. Does this mean the AI has an inherent sense of morality? No, but it does suggest that AI can reflect human ethical decisions in a more complex way than merely mimicking them.

Moreover, while AI does not have an inherent moral compass, researchers like Francesca Rossi, an AI ethics researcher at IBM, argue that it can serve as a tool for promoting fairness and reducing bias. “AI can help us to make decisions that align with our values and ethics if we design and use it in the right way,” says Rossi. In this sense, AI could be a means for enacting or promoting ethical values, even if it doesn’t ‘possess’ these values in the way humans do.

So while AI does not have an inherent sense of morality, there are ways in which it can reflect, enact, or promote ethical values. This suggests a complex relationship between AI and ethics that goes beyond the idea that AI simply ‘mimics’ ethical decision-making.

In conclusion, the relationship between artificial intelligence, particularly natural language processing models, and Carl Jung’s notion of the collective unconscious, is compellingly intricate. Both represent vast, invisible networks of information, and both serve as repositories of human knowledge and experience. Through the lens of this comparison, AI becomes not merely a technological tool, but a digital echo of our collective psyche.

AI, in its capacity to process and generate human language, seems to replicate a facet of our collective unconscious by employing archetypal patterns and themes learned from the vast volumes of data on which it was trained. Yoshua Bengio, a noted computer scientist, has drawn this comparison, saying, “AI models draw on the patterns they’ve learned from their training data, much like Jung’s idea of individuals tapping into the collective unconscious.”

While AI does not have personal experiences or emotions, and cannot comprehend ethics and morality like humans do, some argue that it does exhibit rudimentary forms of these human traits, learned from the patterns in its training data. This mirrors Jung’s assertion about the collective unconscious being a product of shared human experiences and cultures, as he wrote, “The collective unconscious comprises in itself the psychic life of our ancestors…Their experiences and their reactions are seen in our ‘unconscious.'”

The work of Jungian psychoanalyst and scholar Dr. Murray Stein provides a poignant reflection on this topic: “In AI, we see an attempt to create a mirror of our mental functions. If the collective unconscious is the sum total of archetypal images and narratives that shape our perceptions and actions, then AI, with its ability to detect patterns and apply them to new contexts, could be considered a kind of digital manifestation of these shared human phenomena.”

While AI, as it currently stands, does not embody the collective unconscious in its entirety, its capabilities echo several aspects of this complex concept. Both the collective unconscious and AI serve as a repository of shared information, both learn from past experiences (human and data, respectively), and both apply learned patterns to new, unseen scenarios. These parallels hint at a deeper connection between our collective psyche and the digital entities we create. In this light, AI emerges as a new form of collective expression, a reflection of our shared knowledge, and perhaps, an echo of our collective unconscious.

Rudolf Otto’s pioneering studies on religious consciousness and the experience of the transcendent, as detailed in his classic work, “The Idea of the Holy,” has some interesting parallels to the principles underlying the Enneagram. Through Otto’s nuanced understanding of the numinous experience and its two poles, “Mysterium tremendum” and “Mysterium fascinans,” we can draw insightful connections with the nine points of the Enneagram. 

Just as Otto posits a dynamic, transcendent experience comprising two contrasting poles, the Enneagram suggests that each individual’s psyche is a matrix of positive and negative traits, strengths, and fears. This matrix determines our worldview and significantly impacts our actions and reactions.

The first pole Otto defines, the “Mysterium tremendum,” is akin to the fears, insecurities, and shortcomings inherent to each Enneagram type. It represents an overwhelming encounter with the numinous that induces feelings of dread and awe. Similarly, each Enneagram type has its set of challenges or shadows: the fear of worthlessness in Type 2, the fear of failure in Type 3, or the fear of harm or deprivation in Type 6. These fears can often dominate our consciousness and influence our behaviour, much like the numinous experience overwhelms the individual in Otto’s framework.

This is difficult to deal with as our primal instincts, developed over millennia of human evolution, and are finely attuned to recognize and react to these fears as if they were inherent truths (mysterium tremendum: fearful mysteries) rather than unconscious instinctual responses and reactions.

The second pole, the “Mysterium fascinans” (fascinating mystery) echoing the gifts, strengths, and virtues each Enneagram type possesses. It describes the numen as captivating and inviting, producing a unique spiritual joy. Similarly, each type on the Enneagram holds unique strengths and potential for growth: the ability to love unconditionally in Type 2, to achieve and inspire in Type 3, or to be reliable and hardworking in Type 6, and so on. The fascinans, like the positive traits in the Enneagram, offers an opportunity for fulfillment and joy.

Moreover, Otto’s description of the numinous experience’s heightened or mystical dimension closely relates to the concept of personal growth and transformation in the Enneagram. As Otto proposes that the numinous experience reveals our highest transcendent nature, the soul, the Enneagram suggests a journey of self-discovery and spiritual growth for each type. Otto’s characterization of the numinous as causing a propulsion towards itself reflects the Enneagram’s call for individuals to transcend their ego structures, face their shadows, and strive towards their unique paths of personal growth.

This spiritual journey it would appear, often involves integrating the positive and negative traits of our personality, much like Otto’s assertion that the two poles of the numinous experience are synthesized in the transcendent numen, not in our consciousness. This integration, in Enneagram terms, could mean finding balance between the interplay of contrasting elements within us – fear and fascination, dread and awe, challenge and potential. Understanding this duality can provide a comprehensive roadmap for personal growth and spiritual transcendence, aiding us in our quest to become more balanced, integrated, and fulfilled.

The Self-Preservation Instinct is our survival drive that encourages wellbeing and growth. It attunes us to our bodily energies and the state of our existence, promoting wise use of time and resources. It highlights discrepancies between our beliefs and actions and inspires adaptability and resilience. Ultimately, it supports a mindful lifestyle, fostering congruence between body, heart, and mind, cultivating conditions for unconditional presence within us.

REFLECTION QUESTIONS: 

1. How would you describe your sense of well-being and how you maintain it?
2. Do you feel in tune with your body and its needs? Can you give some examples of when you have listened to your body’s signals?
3. How often do you think about your own mortality? How does this affect your daily decisions and lifestyle?
4. Do you feel like you are living in accordance with your body’s real state and need. What does this mean to you?
5. What activities or experiences make you feel alive or vital?
6. Can you describe your lifestyle? How does it reflect your conscious and unconscious values?
7. Can you identify any contradictions between what you think you value and how you actually live?
8. How do you spend your free time? Do you feel you make good use of this time?
9. Are you able to say “no” to things that are harmful to you? Can you provide some examples?
10. How do you take care of your basic needs in a balanced way? Are there areas where you could improve?
11. How would you assess your quality of life, both materially and emotionally?
12. Do you feel you adapt well to changing circumstances, both physically and mentally?
13. How congruent do you feel your body, heart, and mind are? Are there discrepancies you’ve noticed?
14. How do you nourish, support, and grow your “soul”, similarly to how you attend to your body?

THE SELF-PRESERVATION INSTINCT

Simply put, the Self-Preservation Instinct is the drive for well-being. It is the drive to survive and to work in support of what makes one thrive in both the short- and long-term. As our basic drive of survival, it supplies energy to endure in the face of existential challenges. It is the most compelling and powerful drive, shared by all forms of life, from which the other drives, functions, and capacities of our organism flower.

If we think of life and survival in terms of strict categories of “alive” or “dead,” “surviving” or “dying,” then we fail to really understand something fundamental to life; namely, that life is better understood as a range of energy and vitality rather than as a static state in opposition to death. To be connected with the Self-Preservation Instinct means we directly sense and experience that we are living and growing, that we are constantly in development or decline. The Self-Preservation Instinct is aliveness itself, and therefore our relationship to this instinct reflects our feelings about being alive.

How closely one keeps to the visceral, moment-by-moment sense of the energies of the body, especially sensation, is a measure of how present and willing we are to make intentional use of our limited time on Earth. The Self-Preservation Instinct maintains a healthy awareness of death, a source of strength that urges us to use our time wisely and fully, to be intentional with how we live and where we invest energy. What might it mean about the value we place in our life if our breath is routinely poor and shallow? What does it reveal if our bodies are often numb or simply being used like an object to get us from point A to point B?

The Self-Preservation Instinct continuously monitors and gauges the immediate physical state of the organism. It’s sensitive to the body’s direct feedback, providing discernment for what conditions encourage growth and well-being. Listening to this instinct means living in accordance with the body’s real state and need, rather than imposing ideas onto it. It means following the unfolding of our life’s energy. This is the drive that motivates us to test and express our physical capacities and our aggression, but also to rest and foster the conditions that support the optimization of our quality of life force.

Self-Preservation extends its “eye” to include the overall shape of our lifestyle and a “schematic” overview of how life is lived, how much our style of living is a reflection of and foundation for the things that matter to us. When we’re in touch with this instinct, we see how our lifestyle is a reflection of our conscious and unconscious values.

Seeing the patterns we live within shines a great deal of light on the unconscious assumptions and psychological forces motivating us that we may have little awareness of. Very often, the way we actually live stands in contradiction to what we think we value—we might, for example, believe we cherish presence while spending most of our time on mental autopilot. If that’s how our time is used, then what do we truly value? What we spend our time and attention on expresses what we truly value versus what we want to believe is important for us, so the awake Self-Preservation Instinct invites us to look at discrepancies between what we believe versus how we’re really behaving and impacting others.

Practically speaking, this means valuing our lives and bodies such that we make sure to treat it well, to build on and exercise our capacities, to breathe fully, to say “no” to things that are toxic for us, and to take care of our basic needs in a balanced way, like not over-eating or over-exercising. This includes how we make use of our life even in the “in between” moments, the times when nothing is required of us. Is our “off” time spent in distraction, self-numbing, and wasted moments, or are we actually letting ourselves rest with intention and not use time off as another opportunity to check out? Is the way we live guided by waiting for the next thing to grip our attention or by intention? How do we make use of what we have—time, resources, our physical capacities?

A major Self-Preservation concern is our quality of life, both materially and emotionally, and how it is optimized. It brings awareness to how our life is structured, including how we materially support ourselves through each progressive step, challenge, and setback. This instinct’s focus extends to cultivating the conditions in life that allow us to not only live in a way that feels good, but can help us to develop something meaningful and intentional. It encourages us to be economical about where and how our energy is invested, not out of fear of waste or effort, but from choice and purpose. It provides the energy and discipline to get a job or start a business, to get us into the gym on a regular basis, to develop certain skills, and to begin to build for the future from the present.

Adaptability is a key aspect of the healthy Self-Preservation Instinct. Any system that’s too fixed is susceptible to collapse under strain. If our lives are too rigidly limited within habitual patterns, as soon we find ourselves outside familiar conditions, we could face a neurotic breakdown or find our bodies lacking the physical capacity to handle challenging circumstances. Likewise, a system that’s too languid has no resiliency. If we’re physically attacked, for example, it does no good to freeze. If you receive a punch when you’re rigid, you’ll incur far greater damage than if you are able to be flexible and move with it. Being grounded in the body and in touch with the sensations of Self-Preservation means you’ll be able to stand your ground, process your reactions, defend yourself effectively, and endure whatever literal or metaphorical hits you may need to take without freezing or fainting.

Inner life also requires a solid foundation in a well-regulated and conscious Self-Preservation Instinct. Authentic self-awareness begins with seeing how we’re really living, how we’re really treating ourselves, and whether there is enough congruence between our body, heart, and mind, so that how we express ourselves in the choices we make are in accord with what will make our life a fertile soil for essence to thrive. It supports us in consciously self-regulating and being intentional toward valuing our present state.

The awake Self-Preservation Instinct helps us to live and to create the external conditions that allow an unconditional presence to thrive within us. How we nourish, support, and grow our soul in the same way we attend to the body is what the mature Self-Preservation Instinct calls us to confront. This deep well of resilience, fortitude, and sensitivity to our present state is the root system that deepens in direct proportion to the capacity to reach higher.

—

Fortifying our self-preservation instinct involves both physical and mental practices. Here are some suggestions.

1. **Mindful Awareness of Our Bodies**: Tuning into our physical sensations and needs can help us with self-preservation. We can do this by practicing yoga or meditation, or any other activity that helps us focus on our bodies. We can also check in with ourselves regularly about how we’re feeling, and not ignore signs of stress, fatigue, or discomfort.

2. **Healthy Living**: A strong self-preservation instinct starts with taking care of our physical health. This means eating a balanced diet, getting regular exercise, ensuring we get enough sleep, and avoiding harmful habits like excessive drinking or smoking.

3. **Emotional Awareness and Self-Care**: Taking care of our emotional health as well as our physical health can benefit us in many ways. We can do this by journaling, seeking therapy, practicing mindfulness, or simply taking time out of our day for relaxation and leisure activities.

4. **Setting Boundaries**: Learning to say “no” when we need to can protect our wellbeing and prevent us from over-extending ourselves physically or emotionally.

5. **Adaptability**: Developing resilience by putting ourselves in new and challenging situations can help us cope with change and stress.

6. **Lifestyle Examination**: Reflecting on our lifestyle and making changes as necessary can improve our physical and emotional health. We can ask ourselves if we are living in a way that supports our values and needs.

7. **Quality of Life Evaluation**: Regularly assessing our quality of life can help us identify areas that we’re unhappy with and make a plan to address them.

8. **Time Management**: Using our time wisely can enhance our wellbeing and happiness. We can make sure that we’re dedicating time to things that truly matter to us, and that we’re not wasting our life on activities that don’t contribute to our overall wellbeing.

9. **Purposeful Rest**: Allocating time for rest and relaxation can rejuvenate us and support our wellness. However, we can try to avoid using this time for mindless activities that do not truly refresh us. We can aim for rest that is